So basically your answer is based around the "3rd party games don't sell well on Nintendo systems" myth (and apparently 3rd parties in general believed in this myth as well). If a system doesn't sell well and is carried by 1st party games and the majority of 3rd party games are clearly lacking quality why should 3rd party games sell well?
The reason 3rd parties believe this so called "myth" is because the the numbers show it's some what true. You can not deny that fact that in the last few years 3rd parties have not seen the success on Nintendo consoles that they see in others. 3rd parties are going to look at the facts and numbers; they're not going to go support a system when facts are telling you not to. The Gamecube, in my opinion, had solid 3rd party games on it. but I guess I was different from most other Nintendo fans considering I don't consider Zelda to be god of games. (Thats Mario's job)
You know how Nintendo fans react to 3rd party games?
Yes, actually I do.
I can play Nintendo games on my system, I expect 3rd parties to make games on the same level of quality. I am not wasting my money on ports or games that fail to make good use of the hardware (controller, graphics).
Exactly, and this shows up in software sales. Trying to compete with Nintendo on their console is instant failure. Lets say a developer wants to make a action adventure game. With the type of mentality Nintedo fans have, they will simply decide to wait on Zelda. They will get to thinking, "Zelda's going to be alot better than this. Why not save my money for Zelda?". Considering that almost every highest rated game for eatch generation is made by Nintendo, I think that hold 3rd parties to those standards is a bit stupid. If your expecting 3rd parties to make a platformer thats equal to Mario in quality, you will always be upset. With those type of expectation 3rd parties will never have a chance. You can't expect every good 3rd party game to be one of the highest reveiwed games of it's gen and go on to be a classic. You're missing out on so many good games with those type of high expectations.
Furthermore, the weakness of 3rd party sales on the GC compared to the Xbox just shows the strength of Nintendo's own games once more. 3rd party games can sell well on any successful system, even if it is a Nintendo system, most recent example: the DS (in the past the NES, SNES, GB, GBA).
Could you give some numbers on these systems and compare them to other consoles?
And usually 3rd party games don't sell well on a failing system (including the PS3), except on Microsoft consoles it seems. However, this can be explained by the weakness of Microsoft's 1st party, they lack quality and quantity.
We clearly have different views on what a failing system is...
But anyway, in the end it would have been much easier for you to just admit that you missed a few words in your original statement:
Nintendo managed to pull in so much hype with their talk about changing gaming and a secret controller they had everyone, except 3rd parties, exicited.
I wan't even talking about 3rs parties, to be honest. I was talking more about gamers. The people that buy the consols...