By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - General Discussion - LA Times Hiding Incriminating Video of Obama with Radical Palestinian?

Sorry for the triple post, but this is EPIC!!!!!! Dirt backfires again. 

McCain throwing the election and/or hoping to win by inciting hate in a black man with a muslim name = confirmed

 

http://big.assets.huffingtonpost.com/IRIForm9901998.pdf

 

Tax return for the International Republican Institute.  Page 17 lists John McCain as its chairman.

http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalpunch/2008/10/the-khalidi-g-1.html

Khalidi was a founder of the IRI...

Hilarity ensues...



I would cite regulation, but I know you will simply ignore it.

Around the Network

By the way, if anyone wants to read what is on the tape it's here: http://www.latimes.com/news/politics/la-na-obamamideast10apr10,0,5826085.story



I would cite regulation, but I know you will simply ignore it.

Palin and her husband are involved with the Alaska Independence Party, they actually want to leave the United States and start their own country. How patriotic is that?

What many of you dont understand is that Bill Ayers, this Palestinian guy, and many other such figures are professors and community leaders. They serve on numerous educational boards, they attend university and city functions. Barrack Obama and many other people (even conservative Republicans) know these people because its their job. If you are Chicago's education board and Bill Ayers is the head of the education department at a university, you are required to meet him and talk about education.



steven787 said:
By the way, if anyone wants to read what is on the tape it's here: http://www.latimes.com/news/politics/la-na-obamamideast10apr10,0,5826085.story

 

If that is all that is on the tape, why won't they release it or let a variety of people view the tape? There is a reason why someone doesn't want that tape viewed, it could be as simple as someone is picking their nose or it could be as damaging as Barack Obama saying things that would cost him his election ...

Personally, I suspect that Barack Obama made comments that are (in many ways) like his "Religion and Guns" comment in that he made a comment specifically designed to please the crowd; these could be fairly benign comments that just demonstrate (like most politicians) he is willing to say just about anything to get elected.



Another invented faux story. Pretty sad the desperation levels that McCain's campaign is reaching this week :/

Other people have already pointed out that McCain was directly involved in funding the guy he's accusing Obama of "associating" with, so I guess he must not have been that bad eh?!. And of course have pointed out he's not some crazy radical either... he's a freaking respected professor who happens to have a different worldview than the average American.

This is really just another war on intellectualism and non-anglo Americans. I can't believe the restraint Obama has shown in not blasting Palin and McCain with all their questionable associations (and not even nailing Palin for abusing her power and betraying the public trust).... but that's why he's a better man than I, and that's why he's making swift strides in taking this election.



Around the Network

The story is more about L.A. Times than Obama.
that is way I said that I feel bad for em.

People are demanding them to release the tape but they can't.



steven787 said:
By the way, if anyone wants to read what is on the tape it's here: http://www.latimes.com/news/politics/la-na-obamamideast10apr10,0,5826085.story

Then, release the tape.

If this story is going to bit Mccain in the butt, then release the tape.

Who is the source? 

Now some are saying that the source might be Ali Abunimah. 

Who is that?



check this out!
someone from DUNE? is offering $200,000 for the tape.
This is nuts!
http://dirtyharrysplace.com/?p=5296



HappySqurriel said:
steven787 said:
By the way, if anyone wants to read what is on the tape it's here: http://www.latimes.com/news/politics/la-na-obamamideast10apr10,0,5826085.story

 

If that is all that is on the tape, why won't they release it or let a variety of people view the tape? There is a reason why someone doesn't want that tape viewed, it could be as simple as someone is picking their nose or it could be as damaging as Barack Obama saying things that would cost him his election ...

Personally, I suspect that Barack Obama made comments that are (in many ways) like his "Religion and Guns" comment in that he made a comment specifically designed to please the crowd; these could be fairly benign comments that just demonstrate (like most politicians) he is willing to say just about anything to get elected.

 

Or it could be that it's not a conspiracy at all, and the LA Times is telling the truth... that they, the ones who broke this story in the first place, can't release the tape because in order for them to see it they had to sign a non-disclosure agreement.  Maybe that NDA is because of what somebody else says or who was present, who didn't want to make the news.

Oh, that "Religion and guns" comment is right.  It was worded poorly but right.  Like I said in that other thread, I'm glad we, as Americans, are airing this all out.  We get to see the elitists and the condescending, the inspiring and the fear mongering.  I would rather vote for the elitists.  I'd LOVE to go hunting with Bush, have a beer, and talk about his policy. (Cheney, not so much the hunting.  But I think Cheney is a genius, evil, but a genius and I'd want to talk to him too.)

The "Spreading the wealth" comment was not to a crowd, that was to somebody who was openly challenging his position.  That's not saying what he needs to say to get elected, that's standing your ground when someone is challenging you on tax policy and you say to his face, "You're gonna be paying more taxes because you can (paraphrased)".

And if you want to pick on a candidate for saying anything to get elected, I think you are talking about the wrong candidate.  McCain has abandoned the principles that made him so popular in the first place.

 

BTW, I am jewish, I hate how DC politicians pander to Israel.  Israel can take care of itself.  We'd be better off not being such a close ally and having many more people less eager to kill Americans (and Israelis, because of the biggest fear in ME countries is that we are working together to control and influence the middle east).  You know a big segment in Jews in Israel are against the occupations.  The Israeli government and Israeli NGO's (like Gush Emunim Underground, Kahane Chai) have commited horrific acts on the Palestinian people - like expelling them from their homes and forcing them to live in poverty gor two generations now.

Why don't you look at some videos on you tube about Palestinian daily life, and then respond with the normal "Patriotic American" response that they choose to live that way, and ignore the fact that the Israelis steal land and the army kills children. A Palestinian terrorist straps a bomb to themself, the Israeli Army kills 20 times more random civilians, mostly kids.

We do it to Iraqi, Syrian, Pakistani and Afghani kids when our smart bombs miss... oops.

 

It's okay to not love your country when it commits evil abroad and at home.  It's okay to want to vote for a new direction.  It's okay to decide to volunteer to feed the hungry instead of bombing villages.  It's okay to want to spend money on education, infrastructure, and healthcare instead of war.

No.  It's not just okay.  It's better.

A Scholar said: "Killing civilians is a war crime. It’s a violation of international law. They are not soldiers. They’re civilians, they’re unarmed. The ones who are armed, the ones who are soldiers, the ones who are in occupation, that's different. That's resistance." -- Rashid Khalidi... who never was a member or spokesperson for the PLO.

A republican once said: (to the tune of the Beach Boys' Barbara Ann) "Bomb, bomb, bomb. Bomb, bomb, Iran." John McCain -- who supposedly hates war and knows so much about international relations.

Witchhunts, McCarthyism, and now McCainism.  Will this shit ever stop?



I would cite regulation, but I know you will simply ignore it.

ManusJustus said:
Palin and her husband are involved with the Alaska Independence Party, they actually want to leave the United States and start their own country. How patriotic is that?

What many of you dont understand is that Bill Ayers, this Palestinian guy, and many other such figures are professors and community leaders. They serve on numerous educational boards, they attend university and city functions. Barrack Obama and many other people (even conservative Republicans) know these people because its their job. If you are Chicago's education board and Bill Ayers is the head of the education department at a university, you are required to meet him and talk about education.

If you are white and insane no one cares.  It just matters if you are a minority and you are a radical.

 



We had two bags of grass, seventy-five pellets of mescaline, five sheets of high-powered blotter acid, a salt shaker half full of cocaine, a whole galaxy of multi-colored uppers, downers, screamers, laughers…Also a quart of tequila, a quart of rum, a case of beer, a pint of raw ether and two dozen amyls.  The only thing that really worried me was the ether.  There is nothing in the world more helpless and irresponsible and depraved than a man in the depths of an ether binge. –Raoul Duke

It is hard to shed anything but crocodile tears over White House speechwriter Patrick Buchanan's tragic analysis of the Nixon debacle. "It's like Sisyphus," he said. "We rolled the rock all the way up the mountain...and it rolled right back down on us...."  Neither Sisyphus nor the commander of the Light Brigade nor Pat Buchanan had the time or any real inclination to question what they were doing...a martyr, to the bitter end, to a "flawed" cause and a narrow, atavistic concept of conservative politics that has done more damage to itself and the country in less than six years than its liberal enemies could have done in two or three decades. -Hunter S. Thompson