| obieslut said: ^^^^you must be really upset that your dream machine is lagging behind a 400 machine no. |
Hey looking for a ban again ?
Man you ARE a ban-addicted lifeless-fanboy.... I'm not even reading you anymore...
Evan Wells (Uncharted 2): I think the differences that you see between any two games has much more to do with the developer than whether it’s on the Xbox or PS3.
PS3's fail to incase you haven't read.
Man, I can't wait to buy a $200 PS3 anyways. I'm sure It's gonna hit $300 next early spring after MS's price drop.
It's just that simple.
I'm waiting for the PS3 Slim...It's bound to happen....... :)
Leatherhat on July 6th, 2012 3pm. Vita sales:"3 mil for COD 2 mil for AC. Maybe more. " thehusbo on July 6th, 2012 5pm. Vita sales:"5 mil for COD 2.2 mil for AC."
Attention SONY Trollers: You may now look at the numbers for the 2nd week of August on VGChartz. Thanks you and have a nice day.
"Let justice be done though the heavens fall." - Jim Garrison
"Ask not your horse, if ye should ride into battle" - myself
Given the thread creator's history, and the wording of the post and title, I'm giving this a lock.
| Ronster316 said: "Because of disagreements between the two companies over who would have the right to license the technology to other parties, Sony was dropped from the project. Instead, Nintendo turned to Philips" The above statement sums it up really........ Nintendo and sony fell out due to naming rights........... Now hang on a minute, Nintendo hired sony.... Nintendo were already pioneers in gaming hardware and software, surely nintendo should have been given naming rights, but TYPICAL sony..... stubborn as ever and always desperate to jump on ANY electronics device out there to make maximum profit with MINIMUM effort....... laptops/mobile/cell phones anyone?........ as i said before
sony are followers........ bottom line________________
|
.... wow.... Nintendo dropped SONY because the didn't want SONY to have rights over licensing the tech.... yet Nintendo were the ones that asked SONY to develop the tech... THEY ASKED SONY TO MAKE IT....... why isn't SONY automatically the ones that get rights to something that's majorly dependant on them????
And did you read the part about Nint kicking SONY to the curb and going to someone else???? What's wrong about SONY going into the industry with tech that they were creating??? Not to mention that during the following gen Nintendo didn't even release a console with this tech that they asked both SONY and Pioneer to help with....
4 ≈ One
About Us |
Terms of Use |
Privacy Policy |
Advertise |
Staff |
Contact
Display As Desktop
Display As Mobile
© 2006-2024 VGChartz Ltd. All rights reserved.
