By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Nintendo Discussion - E3 Rumor- Hard Drive for Wii

robjoh said:
This is a hard question, they might release a extra hard drive. Personally I would more like to see a dedicated VC channel and the possibility to play games from the SD card. Those cards is dropping in price quit fast and should possible be more cheap than a hard drive.

Of course I personally feels that it is not too unlikly with a HD, I mean are they using the USB ports for anything yet?

yep thats what i been rooting for. A VC Channel. Or if they want to make it simpler for noobs. Have a Channel for each VC ie NES SNES N64 etc.... and under each one have that systems games. Also i been wanitng VC game play back of SD cards. Hard Drive playback be nice. but i'd settle for VC game play back of SD cards directly too.



Around the Network

I like having all vc channels on my machine for three reasons. 1. Eventually (probably not for 6 years) Nintendo will pull the plug on VC games. As such, whatever you have downloaded will be what you have. No more downloads for new games or already bought games. 2. The VC is slow. It takes me something like two minutes to download something as trivial as Super Mario Bros. The big thing for the VC is it's fast, boot up my wii and click on the channel. No hooking up the NES, changing the cart etc. 3. I love the saved game states. I use one on pretty much evey game that I have. I would have to somehow back up these save states if I deleted the game to redownload later. Those in addition to the fact that new downloads are coming which will be allowed to be at least N64 size are coming. So you'll have enough space on your wii for up to 10 N64/original wiiware games. That's why more space is needed. Now why Nintendo is going to screw us and force us to buy a hard drive. 1. I think they are some how bitter that they released the wii at $250 since it is still sold out most places. They realize that they probably could have released it at $300 without materially affecting sales. Then they'd have $50 x 8.9 M = $ 445 M more dollars. 2. I think we see their bitterness in the releases of their recent games. No Nintendo Wii game has looked better than Gamecube quality. It's one thing to say that graphics don't matter, and then get the best out the hardware (which they did with the gamecube). It's another thing to say graphics don't matter and not try to have good graphics. Which is what they are doing. 3. I think you'd be hard pressed to say that most of Nintendo's releases should be $50, despite the fact that they are selling all of their games at $50. Excite Truck, a good game, but pitiful multiplayer. Should be less than $50 or have better multiplayer. Wario Ware, same game that they've released on the GBA and DS at a significantly lower price. Should be less than $50. Pokeman Revolution, never played it, but most say it's an extension of the DS game which is $15 cheaper. Big Brain Academy, another DS port with extended multiplayer. The DS game was $20. Mario Party 8, we'll skip past this bore fest which is the same game as the past iterations. But my point is that they haven't pushed the system or given it any real system sellers so far. Instead they are pushing crap on us, knowing we'll buy it because we are game starved and because they have a good track record. That is why they won't let us use our SD cards. I have two SD cards, a 1 gig and a 2 gig for my digital camera. Even the one gig (at twice the internal memory) would probably give me enough space to be happy for the rest of the Wii's life span. So if they make SD cards "playable" Nintendo receives $0 from me. So what they'll do is make a USB hardrive that you can only use the Nintendo brand. Then they'll charge you either $50 or $100, and give you something pitiful like 5 gigs of storage (since even the most hardcore downloaders would be hard pressed to use 5 gigs).



I'm not sure I agree with the OP on a single point.



cleveland124 said:
2. The VC is slow. It takes me something like two minutes to download something as trivial as Super Mario Bros. The big thing for the VC is it's fast, boot up my wii and click on the channel. No hooking up the NES, changing the cart etc. 3
Wow it takes you that long to download a NES game? It takes me a considerably shorter time... On a bad day it takes 1 min. Maybe you should look into changing the channel on your router. Just a suggestion ^^b

Nintendo is not forcing us to buy anything and if there was a HDD released it would be purely supplemental and external. Any complaints with the virtual console are trivial and childish, if you can't be bothered to wait two minutes on anything then its a miracle how you waited long enough in line to get a Wii in the first place. Any speculation that the Virtual Console won't be around in several years is just fool hearty as it is doing quite well.

A HDD would be an excellent addition and a convenience to be sure but I don't see this as Nintendo backtracking on anything or cheating the customer.



Around the Network
souixan said:
cleveland124 said:
2. The VC is slow. It takes me something like two minutes to download something as trivial as Super Mario Bros. The big thing for the VC is it's fast, boot up my wii and click on the channel. No hooking up the NES, changing the cart etc. 3
Wow it takes you that long to download a NES game? It takes me a considerably shorter time... On a bad day it takes 1 min. Maybe you should look into changing the channel on your router. Just a suggestion ^^b

30 seconds to connect to the internet (connect 24 my butt) 30 seconds to scroll and find the game I want. 1 minute to download

Gballzack said:
Nintendo is not forcing us to buy anything and if there was a HDD released it would be purely supplemental and external. Any complaints with the virtual console are trivial and childish, if you can't be bothered to wait two minutes on anything then its a miracle how you waited long enough in line to get a Wii in the first place. Any speculation that the Virtual Console won't be around in several years is just fool hearty as it is doing quite well.

A HDD would be an excellent addition and a convenience to be sure but I don't see this as Nintendo backtracking on anything or cheating the customer.

If someone has a different point of view then you they are childish and trivial?  Great point.  Now I see things your way.  The VC is perfect.  How could I want more games, cheaper games, a bigger harddrive, to not actually have to connect to the internet, to not have psp type load times for nes games?

 

A HDD is a necessary addition.  My concern is that my 1, 2 gig SD cards and my 200 gig usb harddrive won't be supported because Nintendo wants to pocket additional money when the tools are there to accept my external medium.

 

Yes, it was a minor point, the VC will probalbly be around at least 8 more years.  But my SNES is no 17 years old and still works.  I'd like to get that longevity out of the VC games since they aren't a cheap investment.  As such, clearly Nintendo is not going to support the VC for that long.  And at the time they pull the plug, I want to have all the games that I bought.



cleveland124 said:

If someone has a different point of view then you they are childish and trivial?  Great point.  Now I see things your way.  The VC is perfect.  How could I want more games, cheaper games, a bigger harddrive, to not actually have to connect to the internet, to not have psp type load times for nes games?

It's not a matter of differing veiw point, it's a matter of poor reasoning and nit-picky whining.

- VC is releasing more and more games every week. Sorry its not as many as you want, guess life will just have to slow down for a while.

- Price is an issue, spending anything as oppossed to downloading a ROM for free is always going to look expensive no matter how you slice it.

- Wii doesn't have a harddrive, it has an internal flash memory. Also if you can't afford SD cards then simply delete the game and you'll be able to download it again anytime you want. There is no reason to think the Virtual Console will dissapear anytime in the future so please don't use wide eyed speculation as grounds for tangible discussion.

- Sorry the lack of internet depency worries you, but there is always PC gaming if it bothers you that much.

- PSP load times? Explain.

cleveland124 said:

A HDD is a necessary addition.  My concern is that my 1, 2 gig SD cards and my 200 gig usb harddrive won't be supported because Nintendo wants to pocket additional money when the tools are there to accept my external medium.

Yes, because Nintendo is so greedy in actually selling their console at a profit and making it within reach of the comon consumer. It's a crime that any company should earn a direct profit these days, they should all just lose money as a testiment to their love of the consumer. Propriotary hardware is necessary to prevent unforseen incompatibilities, issues and piracy. This is fairly common and typical of gaming, don't act like its something new.

cleveland124 said:

Yes, it was a minor point, the VC will probalbly be around at least 8 more years.  But my SNES is no 17 years old and still works.  I'd like to get that longevity out of the VC games since they aren't a cheap investment.  As such, clearly Nintendo is not going to support the VC for that long.  And at the time they pull the plug, I want to have all the games that I bought.

It will probably be carried over onto the next console as well. Why you assume Nintendo will ever pull the plug is beyond me but you're certainly entitled to your unfounded skepticism.



Cleveland, if Nintendo didn't want you to use SD cards, they wouldn't have included an SD card reader.



Gballzack said:
Gballzack said:

It's not a matter of differing veiw point, it's a matter of poor reasoning and nit-picky whining.


I'm trying to play nice here. Do you honestly have to be condescending? I think overall the VC is a good idea. However, like most good ideas, their are areas that Nintendo can improve upon. Nintendo should be concerned about these because the better they make the VC, the more games that people will download (which gives Nintendo more money), and the more customer satisfaction that is acheived (which brings repeat customers and ultimately Nintendo more money). It's not perfect. My gripes may be nit-picking in your opinion but you and I both know that the VC could be better.

Gballzack said:
Gballzack said:

- VC is releasing more and more games every week. Sorry its not as many as you want, guess life will just have to slow down for a while.


I don't really know what you are trying to say here. Is it that I just sit home waiting for the classics I love to show up on the VC? I don't know what the problem with wanting more is. We could go over everygame that has been or should have been released but I don't see the point as it's personal opinion of the mileage that one will get out of any game.

Gballzack said:
Gballzack said:

- Price is an issue, spending anything as oppossed to downloading a ROM for free is always going to look expensive no matter how you slice it.


This is true. But I don't illegally download roms. I've spent $120 on the VC. By the time the Wii 2 comes around I probably will have spent over $500 including the original content. I want to protect those games because I feel that at $500 I've dropped a significant amount of cash on them. My gripe is I just bought F-Zero GX for $9 including shipping. Nintendo wants to sell me F-Zero X for $10 and it doesn't come with a disc, case, or manual. Clearly they have offered less value than the alternatives in this case.
Gballzack said:
Gballzack said:

- Wii doesn't have a harddrive, it has an internal flash memory. Also if you can't afford SD cards then simply delete the game and you'll be able to download it again anytime you want. There is no reason to think the Virtual Console will dissapear anytime in the future so please don't use wide eyed speculation as grounds for tangible discussion.


It has internal flash memory which they use as a harddrive. I mean who's being nit picky now? I have the SD cards, it's inconvenient to transfer games to the SD cards and then back to play them. They would make me 100% happy on external storage if they just let me play from the SD card.
Gballzack said:
Gballzack said:

- PSP load times? Explain.


You want me to do two things instead of buy a harddrive. 1. Copy games to the SD card, and then back to play then. or 2. Redownload them and then play then. By the time I've done either of these at least 2 minutes has gone by. Which is alot of time to play Super Mario Bros. for 15 minutes.
Gballzack said:
Gballzack said:

Yes, because Nintendo is so greedy in actually selling their console at a profit and making it within reach of the comon consumer. It's a crime that any company should earn a direct profit these days, they should all just lose money as a testiment to their love of the consumer. Propriotary hardware is necessary to prevent unforseen incompatibilities, issues and piracy. This is fairly common and typical of gaming, don't act like its something new.


Never said that it was crime for Nintendo to make money. I commend them for bowing out of the power war that PS3 and Xbox360 are in because no one in the industry is able to make money which means less games, and less original titles. I applaud the way they've set up the Wii. It should make them the most money of any console they've made irregardless of if the PS3 and Xbox360 get hot and surpass Nintendo in cumulative sales. If piracy was the issue, they wouldn't have allowed you to copy to an SD card at all. All USB harddrives and SD cards are standards so I don't see any incompatibility issues there. As such, if Nintendo doesn't at least make it feasible to play games from the SD card, then they are clearly being greedy. They can't offer a better alternative that the external hardware I have.
Gballzack said:
Gballzack said:

It will probably be carried over onto the next console as well. Why you assume Nintendo will ever pull the plug is beyond me but you're certainly entitled to your unfounded skepticism.


That's assuming I get the Wii2 or whatever name they pull out of a hat to call it. I'd have to think that once the Wii1 is dead and sales have significantly plummetted that it will dropped from their network outright.