By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Sony Discussion - Sony on PS3: You're "paying for potential"

http://www.computerandvideogames.com/news.php?

The PS3 may still be the most expensive console on the market by quite a margin, but you are "paying for potential", says Sony marketing boss Scott Steinberg.

Microsoft earlier this week replaced the 20GB Xbox 360 with a new 60GB SKU, now on sale for the same £199 asking price, while the 40GB PS3 costs £299 with Sony showing no signs of slashing it.

It's worth the extra investment though, says Steinberg. "The price of the PS3 is high but you're paying for potential," he said, touting Sony's ten-year lifecycle plan for the shiny box.

"The ten-year strategy is ingrained in all of us. [SCEA president and CEO] Jack [Tretton] has brought that to all levels of the organization," he told Gamasutra.

As well as games, Sony has periodic firmware updates and added functionality - such as PlayTV, a digital TV receiver - planned for the "future-proofing" of PS3.

-----------------------------------------------------

You would think a marketing man would have more common sense.  The funny part to me is that this one of the main reasons my cousin and I have always made fun of the PS3 from day 1.  People are paying for potential rather then what is available mind you there is alot good stuff now so we don't use that reason anymore.  In the end I don't think potential is good enough reason to get mass market appeal as most people want satisfaction right now.  Who knows I'll still be interested in games when the potential is finally if ever met heh.



Around the Network

So this is like when a kid is drafted in the first round in the NBA and is guaranteed a lot of money. Okay. Now it all makes sense and I will get a PS3 today.



Proud member of the SONIC SUPPORT SQUAD

Tag "Sorry man. Someone pissed in my Wheaties."

"There are like ten games a year that sell over a million units."  High Voltage CEO -  Eric Nofsinger

I liked what Jack Tretton said during the E3, since it was more or less just normal talk.

All these other sony chiefs need to shut up and let 1 person do the talking, so that they don't all just start out-macho'ing each other...



The only things that I'm willing to invest in for the future is real-estate, retirement and my kids education.

For some reason buying video game electronics doesn't seem to fit my definition of something that needs investment now for use in the future.



i don't want to pay $750 for potential



Around the Network

I agree that its paying for potential but I need to see the results of its potential first before buying one.



C&VG are wrongly attributing an old comment by Howard Stringer to Steingberg. Steingberg didn't actually mention potential, that was just Gamasutra mentioning Stringer's past comment in the article.



Holy #*$! !!!!

New AWESOME Sony Exclusive called "Potential" CONFIRMED!!



Proud Member of GAIBoWS (Gamers Against Irrational Bans of Weezy & Squilliam)

                   

"Paying for potential" is why the PS3 fails. We're talking about video game consoles here, not stocks and bonds. The value of a console comes from what is out, not what is coming.



Complexity is not depth. Machismo is not maturity. Obsession is not dedication. Tedium is not challenge. Support gaming: support the Wii.

Be the ultimate ninja! Play Billy Vs. SNAKEMAN today! Poisson Village welcomes new players.

What do I hate about modern gaming? I hate tedium replacing challenge, complexity replacing depth, and domination replacing entertainment. I hate the outsourcing of mechanics to physics textbooks, art direction to photocopiers, and story to cheap Hollywood screenwriters. I hate the confusion of obsession with dedication, style with substance, new with gimmicky, old with obsolete, new with evolutionary, and old with time-tested.
There is much to hate about modern gaming. That is why I support the Wii.

So then we should be able to renegotiate our contract then if they end up sucking then huh. I mean thats what they do in NBA and stuff. Meaning we should not pay as much for games if they system isn't living up to it expectations/potential.

Or do we just have to release our player and cut our losses