By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Sony Discussion - Killzone 2 has the best graphics!

Griffin said:
shio said:
Griffin said:
BeTa77 said:
not better then crysis. it is a very good looking game though

 

I'm pretty sure Crysis does not have real time Ray-tracing and Killzone 2 does, so KZ2 is better

KZ2 does not use Ray-tracing. That rumor started from a photoshopped image of the game.

Crysis, on the other hand, uses Paralax Occlusion Mapping, Advanced Rope Physics, Advanced Light Refraction, Procedural Motion Warping, Light Beams, Subsurface Scattering, etc...

http://www.gametrailers.com/player/18588.html

 

During one of the developer interviews he says the game uses Ray-tracing.

 

BS. It took three clustered PS3 to get real time ray tracing of a single static object. The average ray traced scene takes hours to generate a single frame. Either the developer is talking crap or you've misunderstood what he said because there is no way KZ2 uses ray tracing.

 



Help! I'm stuck in a forum signature!

Around the Network

Resistance 2 graphics > Killzone 2 graphics

 

Rage graphics > all of the above

 



   

Improvements are caused by people who complain

Crysis has better graphics than Killzone 2. And Rage and Doom 4 by Id Software are going to slaughter both Crysis and Killzone 2. The PC is always the king of graphics and even though each generation they come close to the current the PC is always quick to leap far ahead.



PC Gamer
shio said:
Gametrailers is full of console fanboys, so it's expected that a console game would win best graphics award.

I can easily think of several PC games present at E3 that had better graphics: Dawn of War 2, Crysis Warhead and Empire: Total War.

 

C'mon be realistic.



I have to agree -- Killzone 2 graphics is mighty impressive. Now waiting to see how the game actually runs.



Currently playing on PS3: God of War III

Currently playing on Xbox360: Final Fantasy XIII

Currently playing on NDS: Chrono Trigger

Around the Network
omgwtfbbq said:
Griffin said:
shio said:
Griffin said:
BeTa77 said:
not better then crysis. it is a very good looking game though

 

I'm pretty sure Crysis does not have real time Ray-tracing and Killzone 2 does, so KZ2 is better

KZ2 does not use Ray-tracing. That rumor started from a photoshopped image of the game.

Crysis, on the other hand, uses Paralax Occlusion Mapping, Advanced Rope Physics, Advanced Light Refraction, Procedural Motion Warping, Light Beams, Subsurface Scattering, etc...

http://www.gametrailers.com/player/18588.html

 

During one of the developer interviews he says the game uses Ray-tracing.

 

BS. It took three clustered PS3 to get real time ray tracing of a single static object. The average ray traced scene takes hours to generate a single frame. Either the developer is talking crap or you've misunderstood what he said because there is no way KZ2 uses ray tracing.

 

I found the interview, he says it near the start as he is walking along the top of the warehouse.   http://www.gametrailers.com/player/34200.html

And from my understanding GT5p uses Ray-tracing during the Pit scene/showroom.

 



ok..if it has the best..HOW much better are they (than the other top shooters)

and is it even important? (since most shooters are practically the same)

not all shooters ofcourse...Half-Life 2, Portal, Team Fortress, Gears of War, Metroid Prime

those are a few 'special' shooters that differ alot in gameplay



They are very impressive, but i still think Crysis is the best. It is by far the best graphics from a console game so far



its a shooter, what gameplay are you talking about?



the graphics r great!!!!!
i hope the gameplay is better though.