Dogs Rule said: I did not address that specific issue because it is getting late here, and I had to swim to cool off since I have a very low tolerance to heat. :) I simply would not have time tonight to follow your link, just like I did not have time today to follow Mr. Elite's links from yesturday. I hope to have an occasion to do so. I may leave this thread and try to start an energy efficientcy/alternative energy thread in the not too distant future. Reason being is that neither camp in the controversial global warming debate will ever convince the other of anything. We are pretty much talking amonst ourselves right now since the only people revisiting the thread is those who already have an active steak in it. A new thread will allow me to discuss (including with dissenters) my true interest which is energy effiicientcy and alternative energy. I'll still check in with this thread though.
Regarding the media: Yes, they will always be biased and guilty of laziness or demagogy(not sure if that is an english word) on both sides. I say this both for the pro-climate change mainstream (liberal) media which tries to scare viewers into tuning in and also for the conservative (talk-radio) anti-global warming media that tries to rally up callers who are afraid that liberals will take away their freedoms and cut into their lifestyle choises (such as owning big SUVs).
I hope that clarifies my omition to your liking. :) I'm off to bed. I'll tune back in tomorrow. |
Well put. I'm somewhere in the middle of these. I listen to anything I can, from watching CNN, reading liberal blogs on the subject, and listening to talk radio from time to time. What I see is two extremes and not much balance from anybody on either side. Denying any possibility that global warming exists, or denying any possibility that scientist's educated guesses could be wrong are both somewhat naive in my opinion. I simply believe it's been overstated by the mainstream media and turned into somewhat of a frenzy.