By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
tarheel91 said:
super_etecoon said:
tarheel91 said:
super_etecoon said:
MrBubbles said:
although i believe he is probably fascist...i dont believe there is enough evidence yet support such a statement.

 

Dramatic Irony FTW.

 


I didn't think dramatic irony was possible outside of literature? Who's the audience in this case?

 


From Wikipedia:

Dramatic (or tragic) irony is a disparity of expression and awareness: when words and actions possess a significance that the listener or audience understands, but the speaker or character does not.

 

Everyone in this thread, of course, is the audience. And the key to dramatic irony is that the speaker doesn't realize it was an ironic statement.

 

And, btw, everything in literature is possible outside literature....where do you think they get their muse?


Well, see there's the problem. We have a fundamentally different view of forums. I look at the people in the thread as people involved in a conversation. Obviously, it's not one way. They can speak. Thus, they're involved in what's going on and are not the audience. I see situational irony. You would not expect him to take a joke seriously, but he, in fact, does. However, those words do not hold any particular value, so they couldn't be dramatic irony even in a speaker and audience situation.

Edit: @Super: Yeah, that last reply confirmed it. You're mixing situational irony with dramatic irony. Situational is where they do the opposite of what is expected. This, he did. However, dramatic irony is where the speaker unknowingly says something of significant value while the audience realizes it.


 We're arguing semantics here.  I consider every speaker to have an audience.  And the audience here (for whom I made the comment) understood the irony implicit in Mr. Bubbles' statement.  I won't bother with this particular debate....since I consider it moot and extremely boring to those who don't find the nuances of irony as fascinating as you and I.



Around the Network
super_etecoon said:
tarheel91 said:
super_etecoon said:
tarheel91 said:
super_etecoon said:
MrBubbles said:
although i believe he is probably fascist...i dont believe there is enough evidence yet support such a statement.

 

Dramatic Irony FTW.

 


I didn't think dramatic irony was possible outside of literature? Who's the audience in this case?

 


From Wikipedia:

Dramatic (or tragic) irony is a disparity of expression and awareness: when words and actions possess a significance that the listener or audience understands, but the speaker or character does not.

 

Everyone in this thread, of course, is the audience. And the key to dramatic irony is that the speaker doesn't realize it was an ironic statement.

 

And, btw, everything in literature is possible outside literature....where do you think they get their muse?


Well, see there's the problem. We have a fundamentally different view of forums. I look at the people in the thread as people involved in a conversation. Obviously, it's not one way. They can speak. Thus, they're involved in what's going on and are not the audience. I see situational irony. You would not expect him to take a joke seriously, but he, in fact, does. However, those words do not hold any particular value, so they couldn't be dramatic irony even in a speaker and audience situation.

Edit: @Super: Yeah, that last reply confirmed it. You're mixing situational irony with dramatic irony. Situational is where they do the opposite of what is expected. This, he did. However, dramatic irony is where the speaker unknowingly says something of significant value while the audience realizes it.


 We're arguing semantics here.  I consider every speaker to have an audience.  And the audience here (for whom I made the comment) understood the irony implicit in Mr. Bubbles' statement.  I won't bother with this particular debate....since I consider it moot and extremely boring to those who don't find the nuances of irony as fascinating as you and I.


 It still holds no significant value.  What he said was simply not what you'd expect.  Thus, it's clearly situational.  Dramatic would be like someone saying "What'd he ever do to you?  It's not like he killed your family."  When, in fact, the person he's speaking of has, unbeknown to them, just killed his family.  It's not just that they spoke of something without knowing of it; it's that what they said holds particular value in the realm of what's going on.

Here's another example:  In Hawthorne's "The Scarlet Letter," when Hester is in the governor's garden to see to it that Pearl is not taken away from her, she asks the Reverend Dimmesdale to support her position. This is an example of dramatic irony as the reader knows that Dimmesdale and Hester are partners in sin, but the characters do not.

Edit: That's all I have to say.  I'm finished, haha.



rocketpig

i dont feel providing you with such is particularily appropriate for this subject. especially when you deny my position out of hand. if you are open to the possibility, you will need to go find such things yourself ...its not like the information is hidden.


super_etecoon

you are suggesting i didnt know that you didnt know what i know. its always been pretty clear that you dont know what i know.



"I like my steaks how i like my women.  Bloody and all over my face"

"Its like sex, but with a winner!"

MrBubbles Review Threads: Bill Gates, Jak II, Kingdom Hearts II, The Strangers, Sly 2, Crackdown, Zohan, Quarantine, Klungo Sssavesss Teh World, MS@E3'08, WATCHMEN(movie), Shadow of the Colossus, The Saboteur

MrBubbles said:
rocketpig

i dont feel providing you with such is particularily appropriate for this subject. especially when you deny my position out of hand. if you are open to the possibility, you will need to go find such things yourself ...its not like the information is hidden.


super_etecoon

you are suggesting i didnt know that you didnt know what i know. its always been pretty clear that you dont know what i know.

 haha this post is classic



Here's a video from my band's last show Check out more (bigger) videos here http://www.youtube.com/user/icemanout

Do I have the green light now to make my "John McCain eats babies" thread?

or my

" John McCain is the zodiac killer" thread?



there's no diversity because we're burning in the melting pot

 

Around the Network
TheGza said:
Do I have the green light now to make my "John McCain eats babies" thread?

or my

" John McCain is the zodiac killer" thread?

 Just as long as you don't suggest that John Mccain eat's interracial black babies that he fathered.



Avalach21 said:
MrBubbles said:
rocketpig

i dont feel providing you with such is particularily appropriate for this subject. especially when you deny my position out of hand. if you are open to the possibility, you will need to go find such things yourself ...its not like the information is hidden.


super_etecoon

you are suggesting i didnt know that you didnt know what i know. its always been pretty clear that you dont know what i know.

 haha this post is classic


Has anyone ever seen Mystery Men? This was a classic quote lol



I hope my 360 doesn't RRoD
         "Suck my balls!" - Tag courtesy of Fkusmot

just one comment...

 



SSBB FC: 5155 2671 4071 elgefe02: "VGChartz's Resident Raving Rabbit"   MKWii:5155-3729-0989

Mr Bubbles, a quick question: How can he simultaneously be communist and fascist?

Also, part 2: do you know what either of those words mean?



rocketpig said:
The_vagabond7 said:
MrBubbles said:
although i believe he is probably fascist...i dont believe there is enough evidence yet support such a statement.
.....the hell? And yet there is enough evidence to call him a gay murderous islamic communist? Man, this topic depresses the hell out of me, I gotta go...

Stick around, it's just getting interesting.

I came back, because I hate myself. And this topic is still extremely depressing.

 

 The burden of proof is on you bubbles, if you want people to listen to you, you can't say "here's what I think. Disagree? Well then you need to go do research, my points are all accurate but I'm not going to explain them" Also, if he was even RUMORED to be gay and there was the POSSIBILITY that he killed his gay lovers, don't you think hillary and mccain would've been all over that by now? I mean at the mere suggestion that he's a muslim the press jumps on it. A thousand sound bites a day of his preacher saying "god damn america" and yet, somehow this delicious little rumor goes completely overlooking by everyone that wants to bring him down? Just the mere hint of his being gay, the even slightest credible rumor that he likes men, and he loses the election. And yet, not even mere snide remark from fox news. Not even a televangelist, nada. Your theories are so completely out of touch with reality that not even you are willing to back them up with evidence, and people that would benifit greatly from merely the suggestion of them, seem to be completely unaware of them.

 



You can find me on facebook as Markus Van Rijn, if you friend me just mention you're from VGchartz and who you are here.