By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Sony Discussion - MGS4 recieves PERFECT 40/40 from Famitsu.

^didnt they give haze a higher review then western reviewers,even though haze is mosty a western game



tag:"reviews only matter for the real hardcore gamer"

Around the Network

Famitsu is clearly biased. There is no way this game is on Nintendogs' level.

This is called sarcasm.



Tag - "No trolling on my watch!"

DTG said:
shio said:
It's Famitsu, who cares...

Famitsu is only the most influential gaming publication in japan and one of the most respected in the world. Think before you speak.


It may very well be the most influential gaming publication in Japan but it is definitely not one of the most respected gaming publications in the world. In fact, respected gaming publication is an oxymoron.



 
Debating with fanboys, its not
all that dissimilar to banging ones
head against a wall 
DTG said:
shio said:
It's Famitsu, who cares...

Famitsu is only the most influential gaming publication in japan and one of the most respected in the world. Think before you speak.


No, shio is quite right. Famitsu is beyond worthless in their review catagory.

http://kotaku.com/gaming/famitsu/famitsu-for-beginners-222494.php

They give out reviews based on what fans want. As I told everyone with their Haze review, even if they do happen to give MGS4 the score it deserves it doesn't matter. They still freely admit to giving out reviews based on what fans want.

When it came out that Gamespot did something similar everyone had their pitchforks handy, but since Famitsu is Japanse people are more forgiving for some odd reason.

-edit-

And about the Gamespot point-- don't give me crap about Kane and Lynch being bad, do you honestly think they was the only purchased review score?



DTG said:
Torillian said:
They may be respected in the world in general, but not here DTG. Not from what I've seen, so expect more comments like Shio's.

What do people here have against Famitsu?


Most people believe that Famitsu scores games based on public opinion. They are, in fact, and have admitted as much several time.

However, most english speaking reviewers do the same thing if they realize this or not.



I don't need your console war.
It feeds the rich while it buries the poor.
You're power hungry, spinnin' stories, and bein' graphics whores.
I don't need your console war.

NO NO, NO NO NO.

Around the Network
DTG said:
40/40 (from 2ch, unconfirmed)

Editor A
圧倒的すぎるクオリティーとボリューム。シリーズのファンはもちろん
本作から始めても十分楽しめる親切な仕様も多くて◎。アクションが多
少苦手でもぜひやってほしい作品。本編に加え、『メタルギア オンラ
イン』も内容、サポートともに充実しており、まったく死角が見当たらない。

Editor B
おなじみのスニーキングアクションや、仕掛けが盛りだくさんのボス戦
は健在。何より新たな要素である武装の購入やカスタマイズが楽しい!
 注目のデモシーンもほかに類を見ないほどの大ボリュームで超充実で
す。さらに仲間との連繋を重視したオンライン対戦もできてオトクすぎ!

Editor C
膨大なデモに、新旧合わせたネタの数々。少々くどいと思える部分もあ
るが、最期まで見応え十分。また、自由にプレイスタイルが選べ、やり
込み要素も多いので、2週目以降も楽しい。オンラインは本編の設定を
活かしたシステムやルールは◎で、こちらもくり返し遊びたくなりました。

Editor D
自動で擬態する”オクトカム”は、初心者にもわかりやすいシステム。
デモシーンのクオリティーも文句なし。ただし、1~3作目からの登場
人物が多いので、ストーリーを十分に楽しみたいのなら要予習。オンラ
インは一般兵VSスネークなと、本シリーズならではのルールもあるのが○。

I totally agree with reviewer #3! Reviewer #2 has some valid points as well! -and that, folks is how I got an A- in 11th grade English class!

7 perfect scores isn't a lot, though.



I don't get why people even post review scores on VGChartz. It's a given that 50% of users will immediately dismiss them. The general consensus on review scores seems to be, "They're more trouble than they are worth."



40/40 (from 2ch, unconfirmed)

Editor A
[kuoritei] and the volume which are too preponderant. As for the fan of the series beginning of course from this work, sufficiently, the kind specification which it can enjoy being many, *. Some being poor action, by all means, the work which we want doing. In addition to main part, 'also the metal gear online' has been complete both contents and support, the dead angle is not found completely.

Editor B
Well-known [sunikinguakushiyon] and the setting up are quantity, is boss game is healthy ill-smelling. Purchase and customization of the armament which is newer element than something are pleasant!
 It is super completeness with large volume of the extent which the demonstration scene of attention is unparalleled in other things. Furthermore also the online opposition which seriously considered the connection with the companion being possible, [otoku] it passes!

Editor C
The numbers of the news item which in enormous demonstration, old and new is adjusted. There is also a part which you can think that it is wordy a little, but you see to last moment and answer the sufficient. In addition, play style chooses freely, to do, to be packed, because the element it is many, also the after of the 2nd week is pleasant. As for the online as for the system and the rule which utilize the setting of main part * with, it repeated this and stopped wanting to play.

Editor D
Being automatic, mimesis it does, as for the” oct cam”, the system which is easy to know even in the beginner.
[kuoritei] of the demonstration scene there is no complaint. However, because the characters from the 1~3 work eye are many, we would like to enjoy the story sufficiently, if is, main point preparation. As for the online when it is the general soldier VS snake, being also a rule only of this series is the ○.


I used the translator from dictionary.com, not the best translation though

From what i understand, they enjoyed the story, and the freedom in gameplay. Thats enough for me.



I like technology when its moving forward..

PSN: methys

most people use review scores as a benchmark for judging how good a game is...in this case I'm just rooting for it to score really high to look good on metacritic and gamerankings.