By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming Discussion - Is Nintendo driving a wedge in the core gaming community?

Well Nintendo is taking old values of gaming and brining them back as new. Game Play & Fun, not nesicarly together though. Over the years combat has been the major association for Game Play & Fun while other games are a novelty. Nintendo started by showing that these "novel" games are main stream and not a niche of the "core" gamers. This change in values however is changing the current statis. What is happening is a form of anxiety from the "core" gamer. A worry that there form of gaming will take a back seat, a worry that comes from not understanding that a novel game can stand toe to toe with the more beloved combat games.

Well the "core" gamer doesn't or needs to worry. If one actually disects what's happening there is no attempt to drive a wedge or detroy the old gaming ways. Only to bring gaming main stream and change perspectives on the image of electronic gaming. The number of "core" gamers will continue to play the games they want to play. It's just that there we be more "casual" games for the new emerging mainstream. This is actually a good thing for the "core" gamer. It means that future "core" games will have to be made with real qaulity so that the target audiance will buy it.

The only change that will happen to these "core" games is that they will have and option to be playable in bite size chunks rather than just full course meals. So that the new main stream won't be so intimitated when they want to be part of the "cor" gaming audiance.

So no, Nintendo is not driving a wedge in the "core" gaming comunity. The "core" gaming comunity is driving a wedge because they are unwilling to broaden or allow the change of perceptions of what gaming is. However the change must happen as all things must evolve or stagnate.

 

 



Squilliam: On Vgcharts its a commonly accepted practice to twist the bounds of plausibility in order to support your argument or agenda so I think its pretty cool that this gives me the precedent to say whatever I damn well please.

Around the Network
Falcon095 said:
Helping gaming? Hell yeah! Destroying it? Hell no!

that sums it up,but people wont listen

tag:"reviews only matter for the real hardcore gamer"

It is ridiculous to think that Nintendo is splitting gamers apart. Before the DS and Wii were released Iwata constantly spoke of the stagnation of the industry in Japan and the phenomenons of the non-gamer and the lapsed gamer. He asked aloud, why weren't they playing?

If there was a wedge driven in the video game industry, it happened years ago and favored the "core" gamer almost exclusively. Gamers with tastes like mine got shouldered to the sidelines. Many stopped playing. Many never started. Those of us who stuck around darted to games like Katamari Damacy like a pocket of fresh air in a room full of farts.

The Wii is an INCLUSIVE system. This has angered a lot of gamers who worry that their little treehouse will get infested with cooties. They are pointing to their "No Girls Aloud!" signs and throwing water balloons right now, but it will pass, because they will realize that it sucks to stay home from the dance.



^yeah,i also really like new ways to play games,and fresh ideas



tag:"reviews only matter for the real hardcore gamer"

If anything, like one of the poster said, the industry has a feedback mechanism when it comes to game supply. Developers will note when there are too few core games in the market and the growing hunger for those games. Then they will develop more games for them to meet that demand, since it makes money.



My collection of guides on GameFAQs: Read them here

My latest guide on GameFAQs, for Little King's Story! Read it here 

Around the Network

Carnival games being a million seller basically sums stuff up for me