ssj12 said: Soriku said: ssj12 said: MANUELF said: Thats not is Sony smash bros, sony not have mascots, maybe cratos or ratchet, but any important. |
Sony has no mascots? thats like saying Master Chief is a Nintendo mascot character. Completely false and idiotic. Sony has, Spyro, Kratos, Crash (original Naughty Dog Crash), Ratchet and Clank, Jack and Daxter, Sly Cooper, Nathan Hale, Patapon, echochrome, LocoRocos, etc. They are far from having no mascots. They have the best mascots, Patapons and LocoRocos. They are so much cooler, and original, then a plumber. |
Crash and Spyro are definitely not mascots. Naughty Dog/Insomniac don't own those IPs anymore. They appear on like all platforms now. Also, a lot you posted are third party and/or not very widely known as mascots should be (like Nathan Hale. Not widely known.). Kratos is the only one I think can do as an "OK" mascot but not really. Sony doesn't really have a definitive mascot like Nintendo has Mario, Sega has Sonic, and MS has Master Chief. |
2nd party titles count, remember Master Chief is now a 2nd party character thanks to Peter Jackson's Halo games. As for definitive, you mean has been on more then one console. Done, Ratchet and Clank. Made by 2nd party developer Insomniac Games. |
No. By definitive he means... the person see's it and assosiates it with that platform. Mario, Master Chief, Sonic, hell even link all have waaaay Higher Q ratings than any Sony character.
A lot of gamers aren't even going to know who R&C are, let alone asssosiate them with Sony.
Sony also never tries to push them or any characters as a mascot, unlke Mario or Master Cheif.
To have a mascot you need to have an iconic character. Which Sony doesn't really have.
When you think Mascot, think someone who could be on the corner of their gaming divisions companies stationary.