Well at least I can trust Gamerankings again. Sucks that Cub3d changed their scores like that though.

Actually, the definition of slander is:

"make false and damaging statements about (someone)"

Nowhere in that definition does it state if you know what your saying is true or not. 

Well you did feel the need to teach me about proper mathematical laws of when to round up or down for some reason, so I'm wondering why you came bitching to me about that and not go bitch to the maintenance staff at Cubed3.com and teach them about it.

You also on the first page were quite behind whatever the OP was saying without doing any research into it yourself and decided you needed to inform the world through your blog. Sorry for misunderstanding but your replies didn't seem very sarcastic in tone. So like I said, you still want to stand by that blog you wrote sir?

 Where in my statement did I mention you? I was not talking about you. I was talking about people in general

(see how annoying that is) :p

1. I wasn't "bitching" to you. I was just explaining that the decision was wrong. If you can provide a link, we can got and tell them their decision was faulty.

2. My previous posts were based on what I knew at the time. Here, I was replying to your own post, that just mentioned cubed3 as the culprit. You chose to misinterpret that to apply all my posts in there. If I was still blaming gamerankings, I would have said it was still gameranking fault. I didn't. I replied to a post just blaming cubed3, therefore I just meant cubed3, unless stated otherwise.

Eh. Well to explain the first post in this train, this is not the first time it has happened to me. It's happened a lot. 

Congrats Naz.

Gonintendo has linked this thread to their site.

http://gonintendo.com/?p=43363#comments

(click the 'Link' button below the article)

Eh, I hate retro reviews, I doubt many (if any) games will have the same score over a decade later (yes even GTA4).

So you've seen all the ground breaking graphics and gameplay advances in the last decade, do you think you can objectively review a 10 year old game now?

Heck, even games from 5 years ago would probably not get the same scores they did if they were re-reviewed.

And yes I do blame gamerankings, they shouldn't take retro reviews into account because they are almost always likely to be lower (though I think IGN still gave OoT a 10 in their retro review.. or did i just make that up in my head..).

It's like reviewing the F40 after driving the Veyron, the Veyron blows it out of the water, and while the F40 was a great car for it's day (and one with a heap of sentimental value) you will no doubt mark it down because you've experienced a veyron. BUT there will still be people who rate it the same as they did when it first came out because of sentimental value, but the majority will say it's "crap" compared to the veyron.

Here's your link. http://www.cubed3.com/about/contact.php

You go and bitch to them. I couldn't give a crap. Either GTAIV or Zelda could be on top, or whatever other undeserving game and it wouldn'tmake a difference to me. I commented in this topic because while you guys saw conspiracy theory, I saw this. Cute pic huh?

2. So like I said, you still want to stand by the blog you wrote sir?