I have GTAIV, have completed 25% of the game's story and I don't know why or how it much superior to the PS2 iterations of GTA. I can see there are more production values in IV and the game is more inmerssive than the previous ones! but...

At least on VC and SA you could buy properties and save your favorite cars! They've taken out many good things from the PS2 era!

Missions on IV are good as always, but the ones on previous GTAs are more varied and IMO just more fun.

IV plays really much like every other 3D GTA there isn't really a big step forward in gameplay (well cars are harder to handle wich although is more realistic it can be annoying, and you can die too easily).

Metroid Prime 3 got less points because it was too much like previous iterations of MP. So why there are so many 10s for a game that is much alike the previous ones?? Sure the story is great! the game is hilarious but a TEN??

Am I missing something?? is the 75% of the game I have yet to pass through that super mega hyper great??

PS: I'm not saying GTAIV is short of great, i'm having a blast with it and I can't stop laughing sometimes, it sure deserves more than 9, but a 10, IMO, not at all... 

The sad thing is, I knew what this thread was about after reading the first sentence of the title, which was just one letter and one number. That's how common these threads are.

Why can't you people go to Gamefaqs or something?!!

Also, there's a sticky on Grand Theft Auto IV. So locked.

Ya well 9,10 its all good have you tried the online aspect yet????does that add value???