Ljink96 said:
I agree, my point is not that different departments don't have different budgets it's that since Playstation accounts for most of Sony's profits at this point, Xbox is not the same to Microsoft so thus Sony has to make sure, more than Microsoft, that this launch isn't botched. The PS3 did a number on Sony, and by the skin of their teeth they recovered. If Xbox has a botched launch Microsoft won't sweat it. Yeah, it would be terrible but nowhere near as devastating as a PS3 level event. I am well aware that these are separate divisions which is why it is so important to Sony to make the right move more than it is for Microsoft to. |
Well considering the part that PS is more important to Sony than Xbox is for MS then the scenario is a little different than you imagine. It would mean that Sony would bet more on PS and willing to sacrifice as much as needed to ensure they have a good launch and speed sales just like PS4 strategy where they were clear on the first 3 years that the objective was to speed up system sells (CEO openly said they were more focused on the number sold than making profit on the HW). And later on they stoped giving pricecuts because they had achieved their best projections.
duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."