In their defense, these games are good, the sole problem is that people wants to cling on the hope of getting Nintendo 1st party when realistically, their catalog wouldn't much for a single year if they were to drip feed us monthly.
Also, Super Mario RPG is a Square game, they need licensing which I don't know how costly this will be for Nintendo cuz of Square's greed ...
Ah of course, it's solely the fans fault. We demanded Nintendo drip feed us for longer than a year subscription's worth, we asked them not to future proof the virtual console for a second time, and we pleaded to have old games forcibly packaged in with pay to play and cloud saves whether we want that stuff or not.
Why defend this, why advocate against getting a better deal? Assuming you're a fellow fan and consumer, how does doing so benefit you?
Hmmm assuming aren't you ? Anyway, not here to talk to you from your high horse.
I made a mistake not mentioning my post was specifically about their SNES 1st party catalog which isn't quite as big as some might think.
They've got plenty ammunitions left. But blow them all in less than a year an there will be nothing left for next few years down the line.
I do want them to expend their catalog with other generations, that'd be criminal to not exploit whatever comes after but am I gonna whine about it when I could just pop one game from my backlog and play something else instead ? No.
Last edited by Mar1217 - 3 days ago