By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming Discussion - FORBES [Opinion] - Xbox Series X Vs PlayStation 5: Don't Count Microsoft Out This Generation

Tagged games:

 

What do you think

Yes 2 6.06%
 
I fully agree 9 27.27%
 
100% Microsoft will win this generation 1 3.03%
 
I hope Xbox will win this generation 2 6.06%
 
Corona Virus will win in the end 2 6.06%
 
No, I don't think Microso... 17 51.52%
 
Total:33
Cobretti2 said:
There is no reason for people to switch next gen unless there is some major issues with the PS5.

They will need a few aces up their sleeve to cause a change,

Dp, sry how do you delete your own posts???



Xbox: Best hardware, Game Pass best value, best BC, more 1st party genres and multiplayer titles. 

 

Around the Network
KingofTrolls said:
Azzanation said:

What makes you say that?

The fact that  the CPU is the brain of the console and sadly Jaguars cores are unusuable, heck they were cheap shit from the day-one of this gen.

So, if Halo Infinite is going to performace anywhere close to reasonable on the base Xbox, it will have limits that will hurt  the next gen iteration.

You act like devs cannot make good games with current specs, so i guess games like TLOU2 isnt going to be great due to the limitations of the PS4s jag cores which run at an even slower clock speed than base X1.

Heck the best Halo games were made on even weaker CPUs. I never understand this logic.



KingofTrolls said:
Azzanation said:

Someone underestimating Halo.. not a wise decision.

Nothing againts it, but cross-gen is absolutely a disadvantage here.

Didn’t seem to be for Zelda BOTW. Like Xbox One, people were kinda ready to dump the WiiU when the next gen hit. Personally all the core Xbox fans are waiting to leave this gen behind and start fresh, just like Nintendo did. 

But MS won’t screw over late adopters either, those who aren’t ready to make the early transition. Halo is better when it’s available to more people. Even the Pc version won’t really affect console sales because they buyers are PC gamers with no want to buy an Xbox. If Halo Reach sold 2 million week 1 on PC as a ten year old game, I wonder what Infinite can do.

Nevermind the marketing campaign has yet to kick in. This is a launch flagship title. It will have its own themed console. You have choice, but the marketing will make sure you want to play it on the next gen Xbox. This is a 5 year made title on a new game engine that makes development easier...this ain’t Halo 5.2

Unless you talking about XB1 limiting the potential of the Series X version. In which case I don’t think it affects the quality of the game. Series X will still be the best version and more convenient for gamers who have yet to get a expensive gaming PC. 

Finally, I’ll say that when Sony inevitably brings Last of Us2 to PS5, because why not, I seriously doubt gamers will care that it’s hindered by its PS4 counterpart. Same goes for GTA5...gamers REALLY didn’t care it was hindered by its last gen versions lol. 



Xbox: Best hardware, Game Pass best value, best BC, more 1st party genres and multiplayer titles. 

 

HollyGamer said:

Game pass haven't made any impact because it's just 2 years

2nd it's not mainstream yet

3rd it's only game pass who does it,  nothing as big game pass provided the same service except  PS now which is not Sony focus right now

So which is it, has it not made any impact or has it convinced you that it will lead to the death of the industry? How strange to try and argue that it can be both. Also it's very much mainstream. Lastly it's not really just GamePass that does it. There are other gaming subscription services. Microsoft does some things differently, like putting their new releases in there day one. But subscription gaming is nothing new and even if it were, it would just be a copy of Netflix.

You are aware that movie studios still make Bluray and DVD movies, right? Music studios still put out CD's and even records are coming back. This is all while having many streaming services and also free access in many places.



HollyGamer said:

4rth Movie =/= with games

5th Movie price =/= game price

6th game budget often goes big and take a lot of time 

Also subscription allow exclusivity among the game publisher if they provided their own service 

Gonna be honest, idk what any of this is trying to mean. Also, movies have big budgets too.

EA and Ubi have subscription services and have no exclusives. You're arguing against your own points you're trying to make. You say game budgets often go big and take a long time. So why would a game studio then limit access to that game to just a subscription service? Doesn't make sense.



HollyGamer said:

Also Game Pass right now just using old games not new fresh content and most of the title are old, this will change when people start to choose subs model (which i hope not)

Sounds like you don't need GamePass to devalue games, you already do it plenty yourself. Viewpoints like this are exactly why services like GamePass can be a success. Games that are half a year old are already viewed by people with your type of mentality as "old" games and not something to be valued. Either way you're wrong, GamePass has lots of titles that launch on the service, and the AAA stuff on there has routinely been newer stuff.

HollyGamer said:

Yes there will be hardware there will be physical media, but physical media will be expensives and limited, and the quality will be not as good when developer still provided direct sales.  

Uh... fucking what? lol.

Again, where does any of this make business sense? Why would a company spend money to make physical versions of something and then price it too high? Why haven't movie or music studios started making prices for their products super high to make people go digital?



HollyGamer said:

That's why game pass will be hard to implement if  Microsoft really serious  trying to disrupt gaming in general by bring new title . game will be cheap and directly evaluate quality and price.

Another argument with zero business sense or logic. "hey subscribe to our service, the games suck!".

Don't ignore what I said about the quality of content on all the streaming services we have right now. Most of the best content you can consume right now comes from these subscription services you claim will lead to shitty content. Again, as a consumer, I don't see how that's a bad thing. Hey there's this thing that looks great. I want to watch it. I hate that it exists. Doesn't make sense.

HollyGamer said:

But if Gamepass is trying to be normal and won't replace old way of owning games then game pass will  just be an add on, it will not be a game changer nor a revolution nor a selling point. Gamepass will just be a something gamer can look . And i hope this is the case because i prefer owning games and many people still prefer this . But again this a wild card for microsoft they are trying to win a lot of gamer  by destroying game industries and devalue the price and at the same time bringing down , budget and  the quality of games. Because who want to make games for, unless the game publisher prived the money for game developer and shareholder will be left empty and goes bankrupt .  

So then everything you just wrote doesn't apply? Nice.



Azzanation said:

You act like devs cannot make good games with current specs, so i guess games like TLOU2 isnt going to be great due to the limitations of the PS4s jag cores which run at an even slower clock speed than base X1.

Heck the best Halo games were made on even weaker CPUs. I never understand this logic.

TloU 2 will be great, maybe the best game on this generation. In comparison with next gen games, not so much.



Around the Network
KingofTrolls said:
Azzanation said:

You act like devs cannot make good games with current specs, so i guess games like TLOU2 isnt going to be great due to the limitations of the PS4s jag cores which run at an even slower clock speed than base X1.

Heck the best Halo games were made on even weaker CPUs. I never understand this logic.

TloU 2 will be great, maybe the best game on this generation. In comparison with next gen games, not so much.

See that’s where it gets grey. You talking about the game making the most out of the next gen tech. But “best game” to many, arguably more people, is the quality of said game.

LOU 2 can get a metacritic of 95 and it could get a remastered PS5 version. Put it beside a PS5 exclusive that was natively made for the platform with a metacritic of 75...and your argument sounds a little silly. LOU2 will still very much be considered the best game by the masses despite being a PS4 game first. 



Xbox: Best hardware, Game Pass best value, best BC, more 1st party genres and multiplayer titles. 

 

sales2099 said:

1.Didn’t seem to be for Zelda BOTW. Like Xbox One, people were kinda ready to dump the WiiU when the next gen hit.
2.But MS won’t screw over late adopters either, those who aren’t ready to make the early transition. Halo is better when it’s available to more people.

3.Even the Pc version won’t really affect console sales because they buyers are PC gamers with no want to buy an Xbox. If Halo Reach sold 2 million week 1 on PC as a ten year old game, I wonder what Infinite can do.

4.Nevermind the marketing campaign has yet to kick in. This is a launch flagship title. It will have its own themed console. You have choice, but the marketing will make sure you want to play it on the next gen Xbox. 

5.Unless you talking about XB1 limiting the potential of the Series X version. In which case I don’t think it affects the quality of the game. Series X will still be the best version and more convenient for gamers who have yet to get a expensive gaming PC. 

6.Finally, I’ll say that when Sony inevitably brings Last of Us2 to PS5, because why not, I seriously doubt gamers will care that it’s hindered by its PS4 counterpart. Same goes for GTA5...gamers REALLY didn’t care it was hindered by its last gen versions lol. 

1. BOTW is anything but a technical milestone. In PS/X/PC sphere, the power matters.

2.Bigger userbase has nothing to do with the quality of the game.

3. I have personally jumped into 360 back in the days solely for exclusives. And I got a very decent PC that time.

4. So why even bother with X1? Especially with XSX being more powerful and expensive, Halo should be a looker that shows that.

Worst case scenario is that the game will run like shit on base X1 and XSX version will be underwhelming in comparison with multiplats or Sony games etc.

5.I'm talking about it and YES, it will directly affect the quality of the game. John Linneman said it plain and simple. Also, it is not like one dev is doing HI for X1 and the other on XSX on different engine etc. If that would be the case, the issue would be non existent really.

6. Remasters of the older titles, not launch-day AAA exclusives. Sony is bringing big guns here, better for MS if you are right.



 
LudicrousSpeed said:

So which is it, has it not made any impact or has it convinced you that it will lead to the death of the industry? How strange to try and argue that it can be both. Also it's very much mainstream. Lastly it's not really just GamePass that does it. There are other gaming subscription services. Microsoft does some things differently, like putting their new releases in there day one. But subscription gaming is nothing new and even if it were, it would just be a copy of Netflix.

You are aware that movie studios still make Bluray and DVD movies, right? Music studios still put out CD's and even records are coming back. This is all while having many streaming services and also free access in many places.


Yes it can be both, but if it's both then Gamepass will just be a regular service for Xbox, nothing great nothing special and it will change nothing or add nothing to Industries . It will be just a regular service that even Playstation can do or Nintendo can do. So there is no point of game pass.


LudicrousSpeed said:

Gonna be honest, idk what any of this is trying to mean. Also, movies have big budgets too.

EA and Ubi have subscription services and have no exclusives. You're arguing against your own points you're trying to make. You say game budgets often go big and take a long time. So why would a game studio then limit access to that game to just a subscription service? Doesn't make sense.

Movies also has budget too, but Movie can only be enjoy one time and extremely less on replayability. Games are not equal with Movies. Movies are not interactive and not complicated like making games.

LudicrousSpeed said:

Sounds like you don't need GamePass to devalue games, you already do it plenty yourself. Viewpoints like this are exactly why services like GamePass can be a success. Games that are half a year old are already viewed by people with your type of mentality as "old" games and not something to be valued. Either way you're wrong, GamePass has lots of titles that launch on the service, and the AAA stuff on there has routinely been newer stuff.

That's the point, the games already devalue them self. Adding game pass as "mainstream" will hasten the process. Like I said that happen if Microsoft trying to make it fully free and kill the normal payment method  and traditional method

LudicrousSpeed said:

Uh... fucking what? lol.

Again, where does any of this make business sense? Why would a company spend money to make physical versions of something and then price it too high? Why haven't movie or music studios started making prices for their products super high to make people go digital?

 

The less people buy hardware and physical  , the less product to be produce and create rarity in the market. It will inflate the price 

LudicrousSpeed said:

Another argument with zero business sense or logic. "hey subscribe to our service, the games suck!".

Don't ignore what I said about the quality of content on all the streaming services we have right now. Most of the best content you can consume right now comes from these subscription services you claim will lead to shitty content. Again, as a consumer, I don't see how that's a bad thing. Hey there's this thing that looks great. I want to watch it. I hate that it exists. Doesn't make sense.

The games suck because game company don't want to spend money on creating big budget title, due to people will just pay one dollar on subscription or worse. Game company are not renting it. They one to sell it

LudicrousSpeed said:

  So then everything you just wrote doesn't apply? Nice.

It depends where you choose to be. Are you hoping Microsoft to gain advantage from game pass then Microsoft will surely kill triple A games . But if you are hoping it will not change and physical games will have normal price and normal ownership methode then gamepass don't add up anything and it will just a normal service that people can get on Playstation. Because the point of Gamepass is to steal Sony market and invite casual to joint Xbox  and there is no point if People still buying physical games.





Pemalite said:
HollyGamer said:

PC Play

Erik lists the fact that Xbox exclusives being on PC is a disadvantage, and yet I think you can easily see that as a perk, the fact that every Xbox exclusive you buy, you get a second, free copy on PC. Yes, you can say “why buy an Xbox when you just need a gaming PC?” and yet the vast majority of gamers can’t afford a $1K+ gaming PC, but would rather just stick with a hugely powerful $500 console. Additionally, Sony seems to be slowly realizing the wisdom of bringing exclusives to PC as well. Perhaps well after release, but that seems likely to expand in the future.

* Falsely Assumes all Gaming PC's are $1k+
* Assumes people would rather stick to a gaming console. (Obviously ignoring how massive the PC is!)

Yeah not all people has 1K USD gaming PC, agree with that. It's just PC parts prices due to times will slowly go down and many parts will be cheap. PC gamers will able to buy new hardware to upgrade. Or build a new one 



sales2099 said:

See that’s where it gets grey. You talking about the game making the most out of the next gen tech. But “best game” to many, arguably more people, is the quality of said game.

LOU 2 can get a metacritic of 95 and it could get a remastered PS5 version. Put it beside a PS5 exclusive that was natively made for the platform with a metacritic of 75...and your argument sounds a little silly. LOU2 will still very much be considered the best game by the masses despite being a PS4 game first. 

Please understand - we will both  laugh at PS4 and X1 soon. I bought a Pro and since that day PS4 Amateur became non existent for me, and Im sure as fuck that we will agree with ourselves, perhaps in the November this year.

Edit - PS5 remasters:

PS4 remaster of TloU looks like Nintendo game in comparison to Horizon and God of War.