By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Nintendo Discussion - Smash Bros DLC 5 Presentation announced: 01/16 6AM PT



Around the Network
Barkley said:
JWeinCom said:
for those who don't want another Fire Emblem character you don't have to buy it ^_^.

Except for all the people who already bought it with the fighters pass.

Nope, they didn't have to buy it either.  They chose to, which would be pretty stupid, unless like me they were sure they'd want whatever characters were offered.  And since Corrin was released last time as DLC, it's not like this wasn't foreseeable.



I just woke up and I turned on Youtube expecting some 3rd party thing. WTF is this shit?! ANother fucking FE character? WHO THE FUCK ASKED FOR THIS SHIT?!



Bite my shiny metal cockpit!

I dont get it.

Before the presentation we had 1 chance of getting the character we wanted. (ok, sakurai said we would have more, but I expected it would be something like piranha plant...)
Now, we have 6 chances of having the character we want.
Even for those who didnt want Byleth, or think it shouldnt be on smash, is a win situation.

I will never get this trend of gaming community that having something optional they didnt want (or thing it shouldnt exist) is worse than not having it.



Everyone is going mad on Twitter



Pocky Lover Boy! 

Around the Network
jonathanalis said:
I dont get it.

Before the presentation we had 1 chance of getting the character we wanted. (ok, sakurai said we would have more, but I expected it would be something like piranha plant...)
Now, we have 6 chances of having the character we want.
Even for those who didnt want Byleth, or think it shouldnt be on smash, is a win situation.

I will never get this trend of gaming community that having something optional they didnt want (or thing it shouldnt exist) is worse than not having it.

The problem is that another FE character feels like something nobody wanted. Not in the sense that you don't want but also don't mind it's there. It's in the sense of actively disliking it's presence in the roster.





Bite my shiny metal cockpit!

Nu-13 said:
jonathanalis said:
I dont get it.

Before the presentation we had 1 chance of getting the character we wanted. (ok, sakurai said we would have more, but I expected it would be something like piranha plant...)
Now, we have 6 chances of having the character we want.
Even for those who didnt want Byleth, or think it shouldnt be on smash, is a win situation.

I will never get this trend of gaming community that having something optional they didnt want (or thing it shouldnt exist) is worse than not having it.

The problem is that another FE character feels like something nobody wanted. Not in the sense that you don't want but also don't mind it's there. It's in the sense of actively disliking it's presence in the roster.

Then... don't buy the DLC? They're out to make money so, if nobody buys it, they'll probably stop releasing Fire Emblem characters as DLC.



Well, as my boy Thanos once said: Reality is often disappointing.



Hiku said:

Well, not every character can be a guest character. Those licenses aren't cheap. So the latest FE rep makes sense. Even though there are many FE characters in the game.

I imagined the three fingers/question marks could mean DMC3, Three Houses, No More Heroes 3, or 3 individual character reveals. Although the last one seemed very unlikely.

By the way, Capcom's Jan 16 announcement turned out to be a Style Change option for DMC3 for Switch.

Barkley said:

Welp... Fire Emblem character...

Not sure why this was apparently so secretive within Nintendo, nor why he said they'd be surprised.

Did Sakurai say people would be surprised?

Does Nintendo pay licensing fees?  Honestly for a character like Banjo, it seems like Microsoft gains as much or more from him being in Smash than Smash gains from his presence.