It's clear that you know nothing about game development, it would be like asking my barber for help with tax issues. 

This site is called VGchartz, yet you seem unaware that Xbox been keeping up to the PS4 in the US. 28 million PS4 to 24.4 Xbox one.... yet somehow the Xbox brand is irrelevant even in the US.   

You've clearly never bothered with informing yourself with Video games history, the fall of Sony with PS3, rise and fall of Nintendo (Wii, WiiU & Switch). 

Microsoft pretty much gave last generation to Sony with Don Matrix weird marketing and the way they they wanted to have the Xbox Brand focus on being a multi media console. 

We about to have the start to a new generation yet your calling PS5 the champion without them having done anything.

It's clear with your statement that you have no ideas what been happening outside your Sony eco system. In order for Sony to obtain the same amount of success they would have to recreate the same environment that they had for the start of the PS4 era. That's simply not the case, Sony with the start of the Ps5 has to deal with:
*A Nintendo that is enjoying current success with Switch.
*A microsoft that has made huge invest in studios acquisition, wants to lead the industry in term of power and offer a Subscription service that Sony doesn't yet have an answer to with Gamepass. 
*There is also the launch of cloud service, with Google Stadia and Microsoft Xcloud.

Sony success is due to having sold the most console to the casual gamers. The same casual gamers that made Xbox 360 the market leader for the most part of the previous generation. You are aware that in order for Sony PS5 to be the market leader they need to have sold the most console. Also, Sony has the current market leader is the one company that stand to lose the most if the competition manage to grow their own install base compare to last generation.

Sony hasn't won anything yet when it comes to next generation and part of what you don't like with Microsoft or whatever the competition to PS5 is doing will actually appeal greatly to the casual market that picked up a PS4 last generation. Service like gamepass and being able to continues using older consoles mean alot more to this crowd then any Sony exclusives. 

Lol yeah

What is old game design concept?

Infamous:SS and Killzone didnt have openworld's with hundreds of NPCs.

Its actually more valid to say PS3 and 360 couldnt handle something like Dead Rising 3 and 4. That actually was open world with tons of NPCs.

Titanfall was a terribly optimized game, period. It didnt hold 60 fps and it was 768p I think with underwhelming graphics. Halo MCC looks better with 360 assets and effects. Also does a better job at resolution and performance.

Watchdogs actually looked pretty good compared to many other early 8th gen games. Did you actually play a 7th gen version? They're playable but look and run awful.

Most importantly, you're neglecting Battlefield 4 and Hardline. Those games still look great inspite of beimg multiplat.

CoD AW also looked great. It was the last time that series held 60 fps well on a base X1 and PS4.

Then there was Shadow or Mordor. 8th gen was the lead and looked great for the time. Meanwhile 7th gen got trash ports.

I'm sorry, but what makes you think that the likes of Guerrilla, Insomniac, Japan Studio, and San Diego won't have games ready within the first year or 2? Or that ND's MP game is not within the 1st year of the PS5? And collaboration games with studios like Bluepoint etc?

You can't be serious, PS4 and Xbox One CPU's could barely handle these huge crowds with drops to 15 fps and you expected PS3 version?

Please just stop, some games are just not possible on older consoles without drastically changing the game.

Yeah but that doesn't apply to all of Sony's studios. Some will have games ready for launch, 1st and 2nd year.

As for the ND MP game, depends what it ends up being, but they have a separate team i believe

John Lineman from Digital Foundry has spoken about how future games "design "  will be held back, hampered and limit by current gen tech if games design for cross gen.  

Many games from last gen already prove this, many games came as cross gen games look bad event on PC and PS4/Xbox One thanks to old hardware limit the potential.

games like Watchdog, Titanfall etc.

Battlefield 4 was design using PC not PS3 nor Xbox 360. If games were design using Xbox One then Xbox series X will just look plain ugly with just better resolution and better frame rates . If games are designed using Xbox series X and then  scaling down will probably  better instead using Xbox One as standard.  But still some aspect on Xbox Series X will still be held down due to parity on game design across  Xbox platform. 

That's why New 3DS games has games has that cannot playable on old 3DS hardware , or perhaps PC has certain minimum requirement on it, because the games was build upun new foundation and new hardware. You can scale down games but you cannot scale up game design based on low spec machine.  

It's true that AC Unity wasn't great, had a lot of technical problems and the crowds didn't add much to the game. But that still doesn't change the fact that they chose to make two different games in order to support ps3/360 and make the full next gen leap to ps4/Xone with Unity. And like I said, why do you think there isn't going to be a Cyberpunk port for the Switch, when they did port the Witcher 3?  

He makes my exact point. "games that did appear on 360 and XO required separate teams with their own budgets." This is what I keep saying! If the 9th gen version is the lead, then some other studio can retool it to be a functional 8th gen game. That's exactly how several 360 and X1 cross gen games were handled. Forza Horizon 2 on 360 was essentially recreated on the Forza Horizon 1 engine.

You didnt need DF to explain this shit, I have been talking to you directly.

There are cross gen games that look bad, but not all do. BF, Destiny, Shadow of Mordor, Watchdogs, Evil Within, Thief and other titles look solid for cross gen releases and early 8th gen games in general. There are also 8th gen exclusives that look like shit. Your argument is invalid.

Why does it matter if BF4 was designed for PC first? Its a great looking cross gen game. It's the engine that scales. Your argument is again invalid.

I agree if a game is being worked on with 8th gen in mind first, that can compromise some aspects of a game. But you still need significantly more GPU power, RAM and CPU power to turn many X1 games into 4K, 60 fps with next gen assets. RDR2 for example needs the rumored Series X power just to become 4K, 60 fps with improved visuals on a console.

Lastly and most importantly. Cross gen of AAA content is only promised for a couple years. That will be a small fraction of the gen. Games simply being fun is more important than cutting edge. This is why many of the most actively played games at moment are fairly simple technically. Even on Steam people flock to games with low spec requirements. Meanwhile GTAV keeps doing well in sales, a 7th gen game.