By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Politics Discussion - Trump's DOJ might overturn Paramount Decree that'll allow studios to buy movie theaters

[SOURCE]

On Monday, Assistant Attorney General Makan Delrahim announced an unexpected policy change for the Justice Department’s antitrust division: a reversal of the Paramount Decree of 1948. This decision comes on the heels of broader public concerns surrounding monopolies, after the merger of AT&T and Time Warner, and of Disney and 21st Century Fox. It also follows the now-constant beating of the drums for the government to break up massive companies like Amazon, Google, and Facebook. Delrahim’s decision on the Paramount Decree reflects part of a larger department policy to review hundreds of legal orders that some refer to as “horse and buggy” policies — ones so old that they no longer actually apply to the businesses they regulate.

Comparing his choice to Martin Scorsese’s famed quote about cinema being what is inside and outside of the frame, Delrahim declared, “Antitrust enforcers, however, were not cast to decide in perpetuity what’s in and what’s out with respect to innovation in an industry.”

The decision, which the DOJ will bring to federal courts for a review, would allow companies in the movie business to not just buy movie theaters, but to use them in unexpected ways that could compound current concerns surrounding competition and market share in the industry. Your theatrical viewing options may already seem dominated by too few companies making the same type of movie. And this could make the problem worse.

Getting this buffoon out of office and behind bars before movie theaters start getting bought out would be great.

Like I needed any more reason to despise Trump. First Donnie Dumb Dumb wants to ruin gaming by jacking up the prices of next-gen consoles with his stupid tariffs (that NO economist supports BTW) and now he wants to ruin the movie industry for everyone else.



Around the Network

Im good with increasing taxes on gaming and movies if it goes towards combating global warming. Gaming and tv is a luxury not a necessary.



First Donnie Dumb Dumb wants to ruin gaming by jacking up the prices of next-gen consoles with his stupid tariffs (that NO economist supports BTW) and now he wants to ruin the movie industry for everyone else.

You heard it here folks! Fuck spreading neoliberalism around so let's just shut up about the Hong Kong protests and buy our game consoles/iPhones!



Isn't it great when people can write "Trump's DOJ" about a supposedly independent judicial branch and nobody bats an eye?



If you demand respect or gratitude for your volunteer work, you're doing volunteering wrong.

vivster said:
Isn't it great when people can write "Trump's DOJ" about a supposedly independent judicial branch and nobody bats an eye?

The DOJ isn't an independent judicial branch, it's a part of the executive branch ...

It's the supreme court that's the independent judicial branch ... 



Around the Network
Jicale said:
Im good with increasing taxes on gaming and movies if it goes towards combating global warming. Gaming and tv is a luxury not a necessary.

And we all know how concerned President Trump is about global warming!



We have two theatre-chains in Norway and movie-studios own both of them. Hasn't been a problem



Ka-pi96 said:
So? I see no problem with that whatsoever. As far as I'm concerned anybody should be allowed to buy anything from anyone else so long as they're willing to sell it (and its main purpose isn't to harm others, eg. weapons). I do think there should be state run businesses in any vital industries, but not only are cinemas not vital, even if they were that still wouldn't make a difference here.

Sure, I'm biased in that I think cinemas offer a massively inferior viewing experience to TV and are insanely overpriced, but you're biased the other way so you can't really call me out for that.

I can point out one HUGE problem with studios owning theaters, Securities Fraud.

Right now, theaters get none of the box office revenue for the first two weekends.  That horrible deal allows studios to buy up tickets to inflate the performance of certain movies.  So, a massive flop can be converted into a modest success thereby affecting the stock price of the parent company.  Hollywood accounting is already extremely corrupt, this would take it to a whole new level.



Switch: SW-5066-1525-5130

XBL: GratuitousFREEK

NinjaguyDan said:
Ka-pi96 said:
So? I see no problem with that whatsoever. As far as I'm concerned anybody should be allowed to buy anything from anyone else so long as they're willing to sell it (and its main purpose isn't to harm others, eg. weapons). I do think there should be state run businesses in any vital industries, but not only are cinemas not vital, even if they were that still wouldn't make a difference here.

Sure, I'm biased in that I think cinemas offer a massively inferior viewing experience to TV and are insanely overpriced, but you're biased the other way so you can't really call me out for that.

I can point out one HUGE problem with studios owning theaters, Securities Fraud.

Right now, theaters get none of the box office revenue for the first two weekends.  That horrible deal allows studios to buy up tickets to inflate the performance of certain movies.  So, a massive flop can be converted into a modest success thereby affecting the stock price of the parent company.  Hollywood accounting is already extremely corrupt, this would take it to a whole new level.

While movie studios do buy their own tickets, it is absolutely not true that theaters take no revenue for the first few weeks. They take a smaller portion at the beginning and as the movie stays in longer, that portion goes up. It usually works out to ~50% in the end. If they received nothing for the first two weekends, theaters would be out of business by now.



fatslob-:O said:

The DOJ isn't an independent judicial branch, it's a part of the executive branch ...

It's the supreme court that's the independent judicial branch ... 

Sorry, but though part of the executive branch of government, the Justice Department is definitely supposed to be independent, historically speaking. "..."