Just because the military indicted Evo Morales does not mean that that he won't receive a fair trial in court ... 

Netanyahu has been investigated by a neutral party but it's unlikely the courts will settle the issue so he's hanging by his own party's lifeline. As for Trump, he hasn't been impeached so that's for the Republicans to decide and that's also unlikely to happen either. At least the US military is content with Trump not breaching the constitution so far while the same can't be said of Evo Morales who breached the term limits as enshrined in the Bolivian constitution and is also accused of terrorism on tape ... 

As far as no 'physical' evidence of election rigging that's not consistent with OAS claims who found "clear manipulation" in Bolivia's voting system ... 

At the end of the day you are justifying cowardice for a fugitive not showing up in court to be tried for his potential crimes and not even his own party supports him anymore! 

How about that ? The Movement for Socialists promised to attest to the findings by OAS to audit the previous election results so it's not only just a right-wing military coup but it's also a left-wing political coup by his own party or a bipartisan coup to recognize that he is the illegitimate president of Bolivia ...  

I wasn't defending Maduro, no matter who gets ousted or whatnot, leaders still can be incompetent. However, that doesn't take away that Guaido and all the other coup attempts come out of the US's playbook. Just like Bolivia. Like a bad script.

It's all about these countries' resources. Keeping the natives down, keeping the wealth in the hands of a few rich white upper class families and making sure that the US is served. 

If you want to misrepresent me, that is fine. But at least my foreign policy isn't aligned with right wing neocons in the US. Or types like Fatslob. And with that Player2 is right. We have come to a point where, one hates socialism so much, that he/she approves of religious theocratic regimes established through violent military coups. 

Then pardon me, but it really gets under my skin anyone who defends these dictators, these murderers, these destroyers of nations.And you know what is most sad?Its that Most countries in South America(Barring Brazil, Chile and maybe Argentina) wont be able to recover, or rather get to a decent level in terms of development for the next 50 years.Its not only Morales fault, mind you, but he is part of the equation.

No one is aproving a "religious theocratic regimes", I think most people here are just saying that the woman is being jumped on without having any basis for it, outside of a couple of sentences(which dosent look good, Ill admit), against 14 years or recorded government of Morales, filled with corruption, inneficience and so much more.Its that.I think people are just tired of this political correctness and being jumped on just because he/she is not left leaned.

That is just a part of it of course, but thats my take anyways.At least how I feel.

Edit:Oh and lets both admit, Eagle with all his conspiracy theories dosent help, does it?

I honestly don't care about arguing further (and I don't care much for the last part). Cause nothing we say will change our minds. All I want is for you to not misrepresent me. 

OAS is bought and paid for by the US, who hated Morales. They have been known to lie for the US before. They are untrustworthy and if there was actual evidence, there would be multiple sources. And OAS hasn't provided any data or evidence for public scrutiny. And when the military does a coup, you know the trial won't be fair. Just look at Zulfiqar Bhutto. Are you messing with me? Or yourself?

@Bold *sigh* I'm not surprised by you and OTBWY flogging conspiracy theories on the same level as Alex Jones ... 

If they are 'untrustworthy' as you say they are then why are most of it's members Spanish states including Cuba as well ? Why did Evo Morale's own party, Movement for Socialists promised to attest to their results ? As far as data is concerned did you even take a look at their report ? 

Why you continue to defend Evo Morales even though he's been effectively disowned by his own party continues to amaze me ... 

I don't care much for political parties playing politics to protect themselves. If they don't disown Morales, the military will destroy their party all together. I don't get how you can't seem to have much grasp of the obvious. A teenager could have given you that answer.

And regarding conspiracy theories the level of Alex Jones, I'm sure you would have said the same thing if I told you about Abu Ghuraib, or that US soldiers were shooting up civilians and journalists during the US invasion of Iraq or that the WMD lie was made up or that Syrian chemical weapons attacks are a lie or what happens at Gitmo or the CIA black sites around the world. You continue to be deceived by the US imperialists and you ignore evidence when it comes out about their previous misadventures.

You seem to ignore US history in the region as a whole and how much US hated Morales, especially for what he said out loud in the UN what every country thinks of the US in their heads. I don't play politics by choosing sides mate. I use what I know, my own brain, what makes sense looking at the past, not ignoring it like you, and what I think is right to inform my opinion. I trust independent journalists who aren't bought out, Jeremy Corbyn, Bernie Sanders, Noam Chomsky and AOC because they have earned my trust, not because of any misguided team loyalty.

And I have seen what the US does and how it operates up close and personal so you living in that US are the good guys bubble don't see what I see. To me, it's blatantly obvious, not a far fetched conspiracy theory like Alex Jones puts out. It would be more odd to have no US involvement looking at the past of the US and the current administration with war criminals like Mike Pompeo and Eliot Abrams. So I would suggest instead of calling it a conspiracy theory, do your research from sources other than the western MSM and governments and intelligence agencies. It's clear that you are beyond making any sort of argument and just dismissing everything I say so continuing this discussion is useless.

1. If you're talking about identity politics. Yes, I deny that backlash for mocking non-Christians results in less backlash than mocking Christians. I obviously got WAY more backlash from Christians from mocking this fake Christian than I ever did from mocking one of the highest-ranking people in Muslim society.

Strange because I haven't seem a single backlash or personal attack against you in this thread. What you got was people questioning you attacking her for being christian and crazy (and you may deny but your OP is basically that) and people saying that we should wait for her actions and changes in government to say she is worse than Evo Moralez.

2. If you didn't understand MY post, it's that I am not mocking her because she's Christian. You're taking offence where it is not given. I am mocking her because she's batshit crazy and seizing control of a nation. The fact that she is using a cartoonishly large Christian bible as a prop in her show is incidental, and I have already pointed out, is very much against the teachings of Jesus. According to the Epistle of James, those who claim to follow Jesus, but ignore his teachings follow a worthless religion - AKA not Christian.

You were already explained that it have nothing of cartoonishly large, it is just an old leather bible, a relic. And I don't take offense on her. As I put I pointed that we as society are more accepting to attacks against christian than others because "they aren't minorities".

3. Mohammed Bin Salman, not only a Muslim, but the Crown Prince of Saudi Arabia and effective leader of Sunni Islam, is not Muslim enough for you? Perhaps not, I would imagine that many more serious Islamic people would find MBS a repulsive example of how a proper Islamic person should act. But then you can't consider this Bolivian tyrant to be Christian either (as per my last post). But claiming I don't mock anyone in that thread? That's bullshit. I mock him several times in the thread, in one post I compare Mohammad Bin Salman to the Sacha Baron Cohen's insane dictator character Aladeen, as well as mock many of the world leaders who are cooperating with Bin Salman.

I said your OP didn't mock him. You put a video/news and small comment identifying him. You don't call him crazy, muslim or anything of the lick in title or OP.

4. I may not be mocking Islam, but I am not mocking Christianity either. Mocking someone for hoisting around an absurdly large bible is NOT mocking Christianity. Giant showy bibles in themselves are a mockery of Jesus's teachings (See Gospel of Matthew 6 and Gospel of Matthew 23 for starters).

You have already been explained about the large bible. Would the stone with the 10 laws if found and true being very large be called a mocking of Christianity because it would be large and showy? Is the statue of Jesus in Brazil a mockery on Jesus himself because it is huge and showy? I doubt it.

5. The point is you complained that women don't get mocked, in a thread that is mocking a woman.

I am not sure why you are so angry about this, not even Jesus would have a problem. If the Gospels are anything to go by, if Jesus were around, he'd mock her too.

Women get mocked when they are antagonist of feminism movement or any other identity movement. Quite easy to see left wing people and politicians mocking severely (even with rapist jokes) woman, gay or black that are antagonist to the movement and the rest of the left wing pretending to be deaf and blind. So a woman identified as right wing would be mocked easily, now pick up an unknown partisan or left wing identity movement target and do the same.