It's funny to see people here mock Christianity when it has been undeniably the biggest contributor to science ... 

What's more funny is seeing people on here defending a man with no spine who escaped to another country to avoid facing the rule of law from his own country ...

Your list is botched. You're referring to Chile (despite protests), Uruguay AND Argentina. 

Yes, Argentina at its worst will still be kilometers ahead of the rest. 

Colombia pre-Duque counted as well. Sadly, I'm here now and it seems Duque is going in reverse. 

OTBWY was defending Maduro.But thats neither here or there.

All I ever said is that she is very likely to be better than Maduro(whcih isnt hard, mind you), simply because she is 1 week in in her new job, leading a country thats beyond broke.

Me and Donferrari are no extremists, and probably neither are you guys.It just baffles me that, because we are "celebrating" the fall of a dictator basically by the peoples demand(again, the people wanted him out, the military just gave him an ultimatum.And lets be honest, given the fraudulent election, he would never have left the power otherwise).

And just out of the curiosity:What would you call what Maduro did rigging the elections?Democracy?

*Reads the part in black* Good lord... and thats why the world can be such a shitty place.Politics are like football for some people.You dont see the situation, you only want to know if your team is winning....

Maduro had RIGGED the elections.That was proven internally and externally.They had a fraudulent election.And yes, there are some Maduro supporters(as any shit government has supporters around the world, even nazis and socialist governments have supporters today), dosent mean the people want him back.Actually, there were much more people in favor for him getting out.

*facepalm*

And its a lie because?Because the news source you read/watch tell you otherwise?The ones that are (probably) biased towards your own opinion regarding the world?

Do you even remember that Maduro rigged the elections?Or did the "Western Media"(lol) also lied about it?That internacional entities lied about it?That even bolivian entities lied about it?

Sorry but you don't understand Islam, Christianity or jihad. All you have is what the media fed to you, what your western centric narrative tells you and some loose definition of words and phrases you have never even tried understanding

Also brutal dictatorships that murder protestors  and destroy democracy fascist? Then what is?

Why are you mentioning Maduro? Are you sure you know what you're talking about? First get the name of the leader right. Second the American funded OAS said the Bolivian election was rigged before it even ended and no proof has been found from any source, only an illegitimate claim by a biased organization. The Americans who hate the Bolivian leader whose name you don't seem to remember fund the OAS so the bias is easy to know and understand. Other independent organisations didn't find any proof of that claim. Just like the lie about WMDs and the lie about chemical weapons attacks in Syria. And go read independent media not funded by large US corporations who love capitalism because it benefits them so much and hate socialism because it will affect their bottomline.

Go read the intercept for one. Research what code pink does. Why do you trust CNN, BBC, MSNBC or WaPo or new York times? They have blatantly lied about Bernie Sanders so why should you trust them? They are clearly biased because capitalism benefits them a lot and many of their tv personalities are millionaires because of it and they are owned by large media conglomerates that benefit them. Show me that same conflict of interest in the intercept.

That's why I trust different news sources for different stories, RT is not gonna say something negative about Russia but they will have no problem reporting truths that are anti-american. Al Jazeera might not tell the whole truth about Qatar, but they do a fine job on almost anything else, hell might be the best of the bunch. CNN might lie when US imperialist Corporatist interests are involved but they might be the best source on other stories. I consider biases when reading the stories and take what news papers and other news sources feed me with a huge grain of salt and then make my own judgement. Can't say the same for you since you can't even get the leader right. 

Next time ask yourself why CNN would tell the truth about Syria or Bolivia? Why would RT not tell the truth about something that makes the US look bad. What motive would code pink have for standing against US imperialism other than just being against US imperialism. Why would Assange leak bad stuff about Russia if he is working with Russians. Why would WikiLeaks be filled with info on all countries indiscriminately if he works for one of those countries? I know it's easier to buy the US imperialist propaganda but looking at all stories from all angles and making your decision based on that is the best policy. Get as much data as you have time for. That's how I know.

And my team as you say is humanity. I make my politics centered on what helps the list people, not selfish old me, unlike the US government. And it's not a conspiracy theory that the US has invaded countries, democratic countries just for supporting USSR or thinking about socialism or communism. It's in history books. Ask a historian about that and manifest destiny. I condemn any country invading a sovereign nation that has a different political belief system than you solely because of money, power and a superiority complex. The US has caused much harm to the world and this is just the latest example. This is class warfare and the rich did start this class warfare long before either of us were born. Anyone who chooses money and power over people is my enemy. I just realised what the best system for humanity is and I just have the privilege of knowing the hypocrisy of world leaders all over and not buying the propaganda of any one nation like you gobble up western imperialism. 

This guy can't even get the name of the leader right. He keeps saying Maduro

By rule of law, you mean a brutal murder by the military that is supported by US imperialists then yes. And I would much rather defend such a man, who mind you made his country better and who was much more a democratic leader than the current bozos who run the country and who we willing protestors and most likely gonna impose a dictatorship. The man you describe is much better than the new idiot "ruler" of Bolivia, bolsanaro, Boris Johnson, netenyahu, MBS and Trump. 

The plain simple fact is that the US had NEARLY NOTHING to do with the coup. The US was at it's most a cheerleader on the side so the military came to the decision independent of US stance ... 

Nothing is going to change the fact that Evo Morales is a criminal who dodged the justice system and just like Peru's former president who also attempted to escape from the justice system ... 

Evo Morales needs to be extradited and brought into court to face trial just like every other civilized country out there. What Evo Morales showed was a display of cowardice to avoid facing the rule of law, not bravery unlike the others you mentioned (aside from MBS) who won't hide from their courts when necessary ...