thismeintiel said:
More excuses. If asymmetrical was the vastly preferred way to play, it wouldn't matter if the DS was stock. Gamers would be picking up asymmetrical controllers because it was so much better. As for PC gamers, Xbox controllers have been designed to work easily with PCs, with many games having Xbox prompts, while DS controllers weren't so friendly. Only DS4 was changed to fix this. Interestingly, DS4 is the best selling controller ever. You would think with all of those PC gamers buying XBO controllers it wouldn't even be a contest. Guessing some of them have been buying DS4s, too. Let's just be honest here. The only reason asymmetrical controllers came about is because MS didn't want to look like they were completely ripping off the DS when they came out with the Xbox. Especially when they redesigned the controller to be smaller. Xbox fans hold onto the false notion that it's better because it's linked with Xbox or they are used to it. If Xbox had a symmetrical controller, you'd probably say it was the best ever. All this talk doesn't change simple nature. We have symmetrical hands, so a symmetrical controller makes sense. Of course, like I said, most people probably don't give a shit and can adapt. |
Some would say PC have sold more than PS4 and Xbox combined, so it would be the biggest marketplace to sell accessories, so with assymetrical being better and Xbox controller being better then with it having PC+Xbox markets to sell to they should run laps around DS4 right?
duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."