Where will Pokemon Sword/Shield metacritic be? | |||
| Between 0-50. | 2 | 2.44% | |
| Between 51-70. | 2 | 2.44% | |
| Between 71-79. | 13 | 15.85% | |
| Between 80 | 6 | 7.32% | |
| Between 81-82 | 20 | 24.39% | |
| Between 83-84 | 21 | 25.61% | |
| Between 85-86 | 10 | 12.20% | |
| Between 87-88 | 4 | 4.88% | |
| Between 89-90 | 0 | 0% | |
| Above 90. | 4 | 4.88% | |
| Total: | 82 | ||
** Betting is CLOSED - all winnings have been paid out by Machina ** |
||||
Where will Pokemon Sword/Shield metacritic be? | ||||
| Between 0-50. | 0 | $0.00 | 0% | |
| Between 51-70. | 0 | $0.00 | 0% | |
| Between 71-79. | 4 | $1,150.00 | 15.38% | |
| Between 80 | 1 | $1,000.00 | 3.85% | |
| Between 81-82 | 9 | $5,080.00 | 34.62% | |
| Between 83-84 | 7 | $2,470.00 | 26.92% | |
| Between 85-86 | 1 | $0.00 | 3.85% | |
| Between 87-88 | 3 | $160.00 | 11.54% | |
| Between 89-90 | 0 | $0.00 | 0% | |
| Above 90. | 1 | $100.00 | 3.85% | |
| Totals: | 26 | $9,960.00 | ||
|
|
||||
SwitchUP said:
They need to do what the movie review sites have done, prove you own it, or watched it. Then you can review. People are too petty and full of shit to be allowed free reign. |
How exactly do they monitor that?
JWeinCom said:
How exactly do they monitor that? |
Cant speak for other sites, but Rotten Tomatoes asks you to verify ticket sales via Fandango; AMC Theaters, Regal Cinemas, and Cinemark.
Even with this tho, you'll still see audience scores ranging from 0-100 for very trivial reasons.
| GoOnKid said: Came for the score, stayed for the comedy. |
You mean the drama ?
abronn627 said:
You mean the drama ? |
Or that.
Lonely_Dolphin said:
lol says the guy desperately trying to distract from the argument. |
Right, your other go to move. When you can't actually address the argument, simply assert the motivations of the opposing party in an attempt to discredit them.
https://www.logicallyfallacious.com/tools/lp/Bo/LogicalFallacies/1/Ad_Hominem_Abusive
I'll just post the same thing again since it's just as applicable. You're free to go back and address anything else I said if you wish, but since you're just making ad hominem attacks, I have to work with what you give me <3
| JWeinCom said: Right, your other go to move. When you can't actually address the argument, simply assert the motivations of the opposing party in an attempt to discredit them. https://www.logicallyfallacious.com/tools/lp/Bo/LogicalFallacies/1/Ad_Hominem_Abusive I'll just post the same thing again since it's just as applicable. You're free to go back and address anything else I said if you wish, but since you're just making ad hominem attacks, I have to work with what you give me <3 |
lol says the guy desperately trying to distract from the argument. 
Yet again you're too irrational to see how silly it is to try and force a conversation with one who isn't interested and doesn't take you seriously. Your plan is really to just endlessly repeat yourself to try and bait me into a thread derailing argument, and for what? To be right about something irrelevant to the conversation you butted into? That's pretty sad mate, as always I'll just have to stop responding to your bait now as we all know you wont stop otherwise.
I just came here to get some salt for my popcorn...carry on!
Oh and 81 is a good score. Little lower than others, but still in the 8/10 ball park they all land in. I just got my copy and will be happily enjoying it later tonight. 😁
Nintendo Switch Friend Code: SW-5643-2927-1984
Animal Crossing NH Dream Address: DA-1078-9916-3261
Lonely_Dolphin said:
lol says the guy desperately trying to distract from the argument. Yet again you're too irrational to see how silly it is to try and force a conversation with one who isn't interested and doesn't take you seriously. Your plan is really to just endlessly repeat yourself to try and bait me into a thread derailing argument, and for what? To be right about something irrelevant to the conversation you butted into? That's pretty sad mate, as always I'll just have to stop responding to your bait now as we all know you wont stop otherwise. |
If you post nothing but personal insults, I simply can't provide a response of any substance. But if you keep on with personal attacks, I'll respond by pointing it out. If you attack me, and I respond by pointing that out, I'm not the one derailing the thread. If you reply with something relevant instead of insults, I'll respond to that.
Seems like everyone who disagrees with you is irrational and not to be taken seriously. Seems there is a common denominator here.
Lonely_Dolphin said:
Something to do with the autosaves, Bralord explained it well but if you need more check the reddit: https://www.reddit.com/r/pokemon/comments/dwky10/some_players_are_reporting_that_a_crash_during/
Can you do that without insults, otherwise it doesn't really look like you're leaving it.
Continues to respond after saying there's no reason to, continues to ignore what I said, thinks 3 people is the majority in this thread, and believes that popular vote would somehow disprove facts and evidence. Yikes! |
Totally right on the nose with these ones. CHrkeller should definitely not post any insults. If you claim to be leaving something and insult it while doing so, you're obviously being disingenuous. And Runa should definitely not respond after saying there's no reason to. Those horrid horrid people.
Last edited by JWeinCom - on 15 November 2019
It's a little weird how how this game went under the radar of many reviewers ...
About Us |
Terms of Use |
Privacy Policy |
Advertise |
Staff |
Contact
Display As Desktop
Display As Mobile
© 2006-2024 VGChartz Ltd. All rights reserved.
Currently Online 
