By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Sony Discussion - Death Stranding Review Thread - MC: 82 / OC: 83 / GR: 83.17%

Tagged games:

There are no rules when reviewing a game. Gaming publications are incentivized to write quality reviews because that helps them get more readers. If they do a poor job with their reviews, they are going to lose readers/subscribers until they no longer profit and have to close shop.

Metacritic is the average of all publications reviewing the game, and the score that a game gets is the MC score. If you think some reviews are biased and need to be filtered out, then you are muddying the playing field. If you have a go-to publication that you prefer, then you can take their advice about the game.



Around the Network

This may be helpfull for some:






After seeing how divisive it is when it comes to reviews and after hearing the people i trust saying they loved the game, i am actually dramatically more hyped up to play it than before the reviews dropped, because now i know it really is something different to anything i have ever played and it seems to be a game i will also enjoy a lot.

Cant wait for November 8.



LGBTDBZBBQ said:
So, does Pokemon SnS have a chance to outscore Death Stranding?

Yeah, I'm pretty sure it will. Would that make your day?



LGBTDBZBBQ said:
So, does Pokemon SnS have a chance to outscore Death Stranding?

I think it has an excellent chance.  I am guessing 88 for SnS.  



Around the Network
TruckOSaurus said:

From my standpoint people reviewing a game can take off points for anything they want. That's why I like to focus on the content of reviews than the scores attached to it. Even with a game with glowing reviews like Red Dead Redemption 2, I was able to get a sense this was not for me by reading what was praised and what was criticized within reviews that ended with a 100 or a 95.

The same is true for very low scores, you can read them and see what is pointed out and if the flaws highlighted are not a big deal to you then you can still feel confident the game will be good for you.

I agree.  Scores get way, way too much publicity.  They're really just for the sake of a very rough comparison in a crowded marketplace--and for bragging rights.  You learn very little from a bunch of arbitrary scales all mashed together.  

I honestly feel kind of bad for people who heavily depend on metascores, not unless their tastes match up exactly with the average from a tiny group of reviewers.  I know mine do not.  There are plenty of low scoring games I'll take over 90+ games any day of the week.  If I relied on metascores to determine what I play, I'd probably end up drifting away from gaming.

Simply reading one or two reviews gives me far more information than a metascore.



RaptorChrist said:
I can try and pretend to hold back any expectations but I don't know if I have the capability to trick myself in such a way. With so many games coming out, I use MC as a measure to help me figure out if a game is worth buying, with some exceptions.

Without having played the game myself yet, I can safely assume it will be enjoyable to me, worthy of purchase, and fun, but not perfect.

In other words, if the game got a 55% MC, I wouldn't be buying it, as it would most likely be a bad game.

This is why I didn't buy Days Gone. I was really hyped for the game, but after reviews came out, I was disappointed and decided not to bother with it. There are exceptions to this rule, however. For example, MediEvil got a 67%, but I bought it anyways (and already beat it).

how was it? you liked it or nah?

i played the second one which was great but never the first one.



84 and taking in consideration the story behind the creator and the game... this is probably worth a big ole 75 in sum.



xMetroid said:
84 and taking in consideration the story behind the creator and the game... this is probably worth a big ole 75 in sum.

This, it's just trolling, but coming from you I didn't expect anything more.

Last edited by Keiji - on 01 November 2019

DeusXmachina said:
Edge reviewer says there won't be a review in this or the next issue because he got bored and didn't finish it.

Well...That's just lazy writing. ~Deadpool

Really, they wrote that!?

Imagine a race car driver pulling into the pits and telling the owner he's bored cause the track only goes left or right.