I love this quote from the Easy allies Review:
"You are supposed to be bored and that's intentional. Its a good thing"... 8/10
I love this quote from the Easy allies Review:
"You are supposed to be bored and that's intentional. Its a good thing"... 8/10
JRPGfan said:
Im sure theres a checklist you have to go through.
|
IMHO, only one thing should count towards the final score. Fun Factor/Entertainment. Was it fun, nothing else matters.
konnichiwa said: I love this quote from the Easy allies Review:
|
I like Easy Allies, but that might be the dumbest thing Ive read in a while...
the major problem from reviews is a lot of the gameplay is a walking simulator on a wasteland.
colafitte said:
Awards and sales don't owe anything to reviewers that gave a score when the game launched. Awards and sales are better measurement of what really succeeded than gaming reviews..., that's my opinion of course. Zelda BOTW received a 97 on metacritic and then obliterated the competition in GOTY's as it should be..., because the game really deserved it. It didn't mattered if the game received a 97 or a 91. And the argument about more of the same is that... i hear reviewers critizing games like Call of Duty Modern Warfare or Assassin's Creed for doing the same every year, but then a game like Dragon Quest XI comes, a game that basically plays the same as a game from 15-20 years ago, just with better graphics and get a pass by the reviewers (but not a pass from western consumers it seems). And yes, Uncharted Lost Legacy was "punished" for being too similar to Uncharted 4. In this case, it was, not like other cases (despite having a full semi open world level completely new in an Uncharted game that was very well received by fans and critics). The thing is..., sometimes game press values just pure quality despite not being really different and other times they just don't, and i don't know why there's double standars between those games. My point is: It gets less risks nowadays, doing a free risk conservative game that can play and look like a game from 2010 like Outer Worlds or Gears 5, than trying to be original. Games like Zelda BOTW are the exception, not the norm. That's why we are surrounded by remasters/remakes and eternal sequels of the same IP's. I just miss the Wii/PS3/360 era when we have so many new Ip's and new ideas. This gen has been really conservative in that regard. |
Stop looking at gotypickblogs that ignored pretty much Asian based publications on its website especially for Nintendo/Japanese games.
Seems like I was pretty close (I like round numbers), so far 84 on meta and 85 on open.
duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."
LGBTDBZBBQ said:
TLDR version of your post: The majority of western reviewers are Nintendo's shills despite Nintendo games were pretty much ignored by western media when it comes to the GOTY season. https://gotypicks.blogspot.com/ Western publications bias = Western-made games and only 2 Japanese games since 2003. Nintendo was very unfortunate because they were from Japan and the kiddy images of the company made it harder for their games to be discussed by western media. It's kind of miracle to see how BOTW won despite being put in that kind of circumtances. |
I think all of this shows that, in the end, while high scores and accolades are nice, only we, the consumers, can truly appreciate the game for what it is by playing it. Reviews are just that..reviews. Scores, sales, and accolades (while having some significance) are not meant for fanboys to use as measuring sticks for and against one another.
Let’s not pretend there were people who didn’t like BOTW or GOW despite their critical acclaim. Reviews and accolades don’t tell the whole story.
konnichiwa said: I love this quote from the Easy allies Review:
|
That was an actual thing they said?
Chrkeller said:
I am confused by oh so many things. For starters media bias against Sony... GoW, Horizon, Spiderman, Uncharted, TLoU have all scored incredibly well. With the latter titles being some of the highest rated games ever created. UC4 scored brilliantly and absolutely was more of the same, with very little to no changes to the formula. Also MHW is more of the same.... MHW had some drastic changes that made the game far more accessible. Have you played the MH series? I think the larger problem is one game gets a 90 and another gets a 88 and people rage because the scores are different. When in fact, take into account a 95% confidence interval, statistically the scores aren't actually different. Point being, relax chief, a few points doesn't mean anything. |
I don't know what is so confusing. Horizon got more GOTY's than games like Super Mario Odyssey and Persona 5 despite scoring lower. GOW got more GOTY's than RDR 2 despite scoring lower. Spiderman got more GOTY's than games like MHW, Celeste or SSBU despite scoring lower. Lol even Detroit Become Human, a 78 metacritic game, received more GOTY's than better rated games like Far Cry 5 (81), AC Odyssey (83), Yakuza 6 (83) or Dragon Quest XI (86). There's a clear pattern here... and I'm pretty sure Death Stranding will end having more GOTY's than most games that received better scores this year. I don't think it won't surprise anyone here.
So yeah, you can think there is bias from the reviewer or bias when when GOTY's are given. I just prefer to believe in the the latter.
I played some of MH psp games, but i didn't like them at all, like you said, very unnacessible for me at the time. Then i played MHW more than 50h with a friend until i got bored of it. It was a fun game until then indeed and i did enjoyed it, thanks to those improvements. But yes, the game concept was the same as the first ones. Nothing really revolutionary. an 8/10 game for me.
And yes..., i agree on your last sentence. Gaming scores, more even if they're just a few points of difference are meaningless and not important. The original rant went for the usual suspects gaming reviews giving 5/10's, 6/10 or 7/10's....and then dedicating lot of articles of the same game because they want the drama and the clicks. And they know PS exclusives are popular and there's a lot of console warring and all of that, so they instigate this, so people lime me and you spent some useless time talking about them . That was my original point. Nobody talks about the 9/10 review but that 6'8 one....mmmm yammy!!.
It's like what American Sports media does every day with NBA drama and fake discussions to get more audience.
Seems to be reviewing quite well. I'm sure I'll read some impressions and reviews of the game on the forum at a later date.
It's sitting at 84-85. Judging by some of the responses, some seem a little disappointed.
I'm currently playing outer worlds which reviewers rated in similar numbers and it's excellent. Just relax and enjoy the game.