By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Sony Discussion - New IP From Naughty Dogs???? Online Only New Game Unnanounced

LudicrousSpeed said:
Isn’t this old news? This is why there’s no MP in LoU2

No one had posted a thread on it. And just other day there were some discussion on Sony taking out MP of TLOU 2 because they were afraid it would lower the score of the game, instead of knowing it was because they have evolved what they had in mind from MP on TLOU 2 to a new game.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."

Around the Network
goopy20 said:
shikamaru317 said:
Not interested. Sony had damn well better have secretly formed a new first party studio to take over the Uncharted IP since Naughty Dog clearly aren't interested in it anymore. It's the only Naughty Dog IP I care about, and I will be majorly disappointed if Sony just let's the IP sit and rot. Would love a new series of Uncharted games focused on his daughter.

I think it's great that they dare to try new things. Sure, Uncharted is an amazing franchise but it kinda ran its course. Therefore I am far more interested in TLOU2 and new franchises they will come up with it. 

But sure if they want to make a new studio to work on what is already stablished and under supervision of ND, we may receive a good gift on a new take on Uncharted even if we don't exactly need one.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."

I'm just happy that TLoU2 won't be saddled with a multiplayer mode that includes cosmetic MTX, and/or Pay 2 Win.



I'm not seeing online-only anywhere here. That said, even if it's just focused on multiplayer, I doubt I'm going to be interested because of PS+.



Jpcc86 said:
Replicant said:

Bold: I couldn't disagree more. I loved mp in TLOU and would be happy to see a new take on factions.



Around the Network
Zkuq said:

I'm not seeing online-only anywhere here. That said, even if it's just focused on multiplayer, I doubt I'm going to be interested because of PS+.

Yep haven't paid for PS+ in a long time. Just have very little interest in online games in general. If I do want to play online it's only for like an hour or two and then I'm done for weeks after that. Now with Apex and Smite and all these other great FTP online games I don't even bother. I missed online backups for my saves so now I keep a USB inserted in my PS to backup my saves. 

I lost my saves once reformatting me PS and I forgot that they weren't backed up so now I get nervous about now having them backed up.



shikamaru317 said:
Not interested. Sony had damn well better have secretly formed a new first party studio to take over the Uncharted IP since Naughty Dog clearly aren't interested in it anymore. It's the only Naughty Dog IP I care about, and I will be majorly disappointed if Sony just let's the IP sit and rot. Would love a new series of Uncharted games focused on his daughter.

This is news to me. The Lost Legacy was only 2 years ago, and it's not like they've released any non-Uncharted games since then.



4 ≈ One

Zkuq said:

I'm not seeing online-only anywhere here. That said, even if it's just focused on multiplayer, I doubt I'm going to be interested because of PS+.

Well if they make it f2p or with sub for the game then it won't need PS+. but then it would be an even worse play imho than being a regular retail release MP only. I will avoid the game anyway as I don't play online. Just posted the new because I haven't seem it before.

BraLoD said:
Yeah, they told us this last month.
The Last of Us Online will be a separated game.
They are going all out with it.
I loved the online for the original, but I'm not into online only games, so I might end up passing on it.
That should be great for them, though, bring more diversity with a good online experience.
Just keep giving us the best single player games and I'll be fine with it.

I didn't see at the time.

They probably will make much more money. I would say very little people bought TLOU because of MP exclusively (or that would not buy TLOU2 because it lacks MP). So if they do a good game out of this MP that will be extra profit on a similar budget they had planned.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."

BraLoD said:
DonFerrari said:

Well if they make it f2p or with sub for the game then it won't need PS+. but then it would be an even worse play imho than being a regular retail release MP only. I will avoid the game anyway as I don't play online. Just posted the new because I haven't seem it before.

I didn't see at the time.

They probably will make much more money. I would say very little people bought TLOU because of MP exclusively (or that would not buy TLOU2 because it lacks MP). So if they do a good game out of this MP that will be extra profit on a similar budget they had planned.

Yeah, and online games can generate a lot of profit.

I just hope they don't get greed over it, they have a lot of dlc stuff out for TLoU and U4 multiplayers, having a game being exclusively multiplayer will definitely make them do it even more, and if it go the wrong way...

Multiplayer can't ever become the focus of ND, much less being greed over it.

Gladly their games are selling like crazy so they don't really need it, but money is a bitch, even if one have a lot already he will likely still keep wanting more...

Well, for now it's a distant fear, TLoU2 will surely is a damn good sign they are still getting better and better.

Yes that is one issue possible.

But if they just decide to go the route "SP game only", "standalone expansion", "MP game only with regular MTX and DLCs" and give greater focus to SP, mildly focus on the expansion and just use the same material for a small team to make the MP game I can live with it while avoiding the MP.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."

Radek said:
Free to play TLOU 2 MP could be amazing, on both PC and PS4.

This guy gets it. I agree.