By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming Discussion - Bloodbourne= poor mans Ninja Gaiden and Nioh, prove me wrong.

Chrkeller on 26 August 2019
Ronster316 said:
Chrkeller said:

And somebody can beat Ocarina of Time in under 20 minutes.  But calling Ocarina a 20 minute game is silly at best. And it isn't all about content.  Game length is a worthless measure.  I'd rather play a super 10 hour game (Last of Us) over a 100 hour bore fest.  

Content is not everything sure, but i cant say otherwise, bloodbourne is too slow, and too short for me, im 400 hours in to Nioh, i will hardly break 100 hours in bloodbourne.

Too each their.  100 hours is short....  not for me, but perhaps for you.  Some of my all time favorite games are roughly 10 hours.  100 hours seems like a lot for game you don't love.  



Around the Network
LivingMetal on 26 August 2019

Bloodborne = a successful and respected title by Sony. Ronster316 = criticizes Sony at every turn. Yes, we've seen your posting history. Nothing new. I did buy into the Bloodborne board game on Kick starter. Looking forward to 2020.



Jpcc86 on 26 August 2019

Meh, Nioh was shit. Boring bosses, boring setting and repetitive enemies. Doesnt belong with these other 2. Sekiro, on the other hand...
But more on topic. Honestly I got bored with Ninja Gaiden Black, havent played in years, but i'd def. pick Bloodborne over the other 2. Nioh as I said I consider a mediocre game and Bloodborne simply has more fun gameplay, better setting, amazing lore and just overall great atmosphere. Everything checks out well.



LurkerJ on 26 August 2019

Are these 2 games even comparable?



CladInShadows on 26 August 2019

I'm not sure there's a single boss in Bloodborne that would take 20 minutes.

This thread also reminds me that I need to finally play through Nioh.



Around the Network
Darashiva on 26 August 2019

I replayed Bloodborne around a month ago, and I consider it one of the best games ever made. The gameplay, music, world design, visual design, bosses and lore are among the best I've ever seen in any video game.



My Twitter: @TheDarashiva

Most Recent Articles:

1. 2023 in Review: Winners and Losers

The Best Video Game Music of 2024-thread

DonFerrari on 26 August 2019

I can say I really didn't like the game, but well to each its own.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."

dexterlablab1 on 26 August 2019

If you want to say "poor man's Ninja Gaiden", that's your opinion. But to say "poor man's Nioh" is ridiculous considering Nioh came out 3 years AFTER Bloodbourne.

Hell, I love both Bloodbourne and Nioh. But let's be honest here. For as good as Nioh is, a good amount of that content feels like it's padded to make the game longer.



AngryLittleAlchemist on 26 August 2019

It's a very overrated game but admittedly I've never gone far because it always felt like a big step down from Dark Souls in terms of quality.

I just wish that From Software would either stop making similar games all the time, or would make one that takes all the best elements of the Souls games and does the series better than any of them. As it is, they just seem to get mostly worse since Dark Souls.



Chrkeller on 26 August 2019

I am in the camp that Souls is better than BB. Souls is just amazing, BB is very good. Sekiro was awful. From has gone downhill with Sekiro, at least for me.