eva01beserk said:
LudicrousSpeed said:
I don't know if I said conspiracy, I just think your opinions are laughably incorrect and proved so with the list of games I've played :)
The rest of that reply is a completely irrelevant give up tangent. Yeah, we all know MS fucked up this gen and Sony/Nintendo nailed it out of the park. We all know Xbone has lower sales and they've slowed down on games. What does this have to do with whether or not MS thinks single player gaming is dead though? How do sales charts or news cycles change whether or not a game has a fully fledged SP offering? If you don't have any substance to your opinion and have to rely on something like this, maybe don't make the point? It's adorable to read, but it doesn't hold any real weight. I'd no different than the other guy just dismissing a list of games he's never played as "inflating" lol.
I can play full SP offerings in all those games I listed minus the obvious MP game SoT. I don't care if 99% of people never touch that SP content, just the fact that it's there, proves the theory wrong. You're actually making my argument stronger with these weak excuses about how barely anyone plays the SP (which by the way, you're pulling out of your ass, you don't know how many people play SP). If supposedly barely anyone plays the SP and yet MS keeps giving us these games with full SP content, then they must really want to make sure those "minority" SP gamers are happy, because according to your logic they could save a lot of time and money by just making the games MP only and catering to the "majority". Turns out you're just wrong.
|
You should really stop. you are the only one saying that we think MS has no SP games or that they think its dead. Thats an obvious straw man. We keep telling you, a game can have SP, but the focus of it is the MP. Most games have both, that was also said to you. Everyone knows you can play all the games you listed in SP. The argument is still the focus of the game, and as much as you dont want to admit it, the majority of MS games are MP focused, players want that wich is why they play that part of the game most and MS listens and builds upon it.
|
lol, sweetie, you jumped into a conversation I was having with someone else, and they very much were claiming that Microsoft thinks SP gaming is dead. Said it multiple times, even tried to link to interviews where they thought Microsoft was saying SP is dead. If you’re going to insert yourself into a “debate” if you will, try to follow along.
So removing that nonsense, what we are left with is the same crap the other guy was trying to cling to, something subjective like the “focus” of a game. Something impossible to quantify. I’ve already debunked this argument when the other guy tried it, again, try to keep up. Basically on one side you have a gamer who has experienced all of these games almost entirely in single player, and on the other side you have people claiming the games are all MP focused.
Try maybe playing these games? You act as if they have bare bones SP designed to get you into MP or something. And please find another thing to cling to besides time spent on the game. MP will almost always be played more than SP, it doesn’t make the SP any less important. Even Uncharted and Last of Us, MP users will play the game way way way more than SP users. I guess Uncharted and LoU are MP focused? Wow, didn’t know that.
You’re trying to say Forza is a yearly release that barely updates, you do realize there are essentially two radically different racing franchises, Motorsports and Horizon, that share the Forza name? You’re only revealing how ignorant you are with these comments. Horizon is not MP focused. If anything it’s social focused. Think Driveclub but way better implementation of social aspects. The idea is to race and share and compete together and you can do all without ever playing a second of actual online MP. I should know, I’ve actually done it. But I know, I know, you have some preconceived notions, fake numbers, and game ignorance that trumps reality lol.