By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Nintendo Discussion - Upgraded Switch model announced: Same price, battery life of 4.5 to 9 hours - Launches in August (Americas, Japan) and September (Others)

dharh said:
Daresay that there may never be a NS model I will buy. What's the point of a hybrid console if I would never use the portability of it? Oh well. Another Nintendo console I have to skip.

The other 291,167 people who bought the system this week will spill out a dash of their Hylian wine for you skipping a system because it has a feature you wont use.

Did you buy a gamecube? How often did you find yourself wielding that by the handle they included on the back of it? Or how often did you use the Phono out from the NES? Or that crazy attachment underneath the system which never had a use outside of Japan. Just saying, I'm sure there's a ton of things in your house which have features you don't use, you have them in your house for the features you do.



Why not check me out on youtube and help me on the way to 2k subs over at www.youtube.com/stormcloudlive

Around the Network
Ganoncrotch said:
dharh said:
Daresay that there may never be a NS model I will buy. What's the point of a hybrid console if I would never use the portability of it? Oh well. Another Nintendo console I have to skip.

The other 291,167 people who bought the system this week will spill out a dash of their Hylian wine for you skipping a system because it has a feature you wont use.

Did you buy a gamecube? How often did you find yourself wielding that by the handle they included on the back of it? Or how often did you use the Phono out from the NES? Or that crazy attachment underneath the system which never had a use outside of Japan. Just saying, I'm sure there's a ton of things in your house which have features you don't use, you have them in your house for the features you do.

Me and my friends used that GameCube handle regularly. That was practically a portable gaming console, the way we carried it around from house to house. Twas glorious!



Ganoncrotch said:
dharh said:
Daresay that there may never be a NS model I will buy. What's the point of a hybrid console if I would never use the portability of it? Oh well. Another Nintendo console I have to skip.

The other 291,167 people who bought the system this week will spill out a dash of their Hylian wine for you skipping a system because it has a feature you wont use.

Did you buy a gamecube? How often did you find yourself wielding that by the handle they included on the back of it? Or how often did you use the Phono out from the NES? Or that crazy attachment underneath the system which never had a use outside of Japan. Just saying, I'm sure there's a ton of things in your house which have features you don't use, you have them in your house for the features you do.

I don't buy things with features I won't use that potentially add 15-30% or maybe even more to the cost of the thing itself.  The screen and battery of the Switch are a major part of the system, of which I have zero use for.  I gave up portable gaming last gen.  The handle on the gamecube was negligible (the system itself was negligible as I remember, and I still bought it).  Same for the NES phono and expansion ports.



A warrior keeps death on the mind from the moment of their first breath to the moment of their last.



Dulfite said:
Ganoncrotch said:

The other 291,167 people who bought the system this week will spill out a dash of their Hylian wine for you skipping a system because it has a feature you wont use.

Did you buy a gamecube? How often did you find yourself wielding that by the handle they included on the back of it? Or how often did you use the Phono out from the NES? Or that crazy attachment underneath the system which never had a use outside of Japan. Just saying, I'm sure there's a ton of things in your house which have features you don't use, you have them in your house for the features you do.

Me and my friends used that GameCube handle regularly. That was practically a portable gaming console, the way we carried it around from house to house. Twas glorious!

I guess it also had its uses for things like Gamecube jousting!



Why not check me out on youtube and help me on the way to 2k subs over at www.youtube.com/stormcloudlive

Soundwave said:

What you're not really factoring in to that is 3DS sales were pretty piss poor by year 4/5. Nintendo's been able to skirt that issue usually by having two hardware systems so that when one is in a down cycle like that they at least have some sales coming from elsewhere. 

I don't think Nintendo is cool with having low sales like that towards the end of the life cycle especially if Switch is basically their only system. 

6 year cycles are stupid for Nintendo, especially when they basically use up most of their AAA IP by year 3 ... so you have 3 years of basically sequels that aren't going to bring in huge new waves of audiences because the predacessor already did that (guess what ... BOTW2 won't sell as many systems as BOTW did in part because BOTW is so successful at selling and bringing in people who would be interested in a game like that). 

And what were the Wii U's sales during that the 3DS' 4th and 5th years, if I may ask? Even when the Switch starts to decline (as they naturally will), it's baseline and sales will be considerably above what the 3DS was when it started to drop. I think Nintendo will be fine. They won't be so quick to press the panic (Switch 2) button now or at any point before it's ready.

Much like Curl already touched on, the Switch is not like prior Nintendo systems. It's broken multiple records already and is starting to outpace the Wii U and 3DS combined, all before a price cut or hardware revision has been released. And you left out the negative aspect of supporting two hardware systems. They had to divide their 1st party development and resources between them. Which has usually led to one system getting good support while the other dries up.

When Nintendo began preparing and shifting gears towards the 3DS in 2010 and 2011, they pretty much left the Wii for dead in the process. Then, when they started prioritizing the Wii U in 2013 and early 2014, the 3DS paid the price with a slower release schedule in 2014 and 2015. Then when they shifted focus back to the 3DS once they saw the Wii U was a lost cause in late 2014 and 2015, that was when the Wii U died. 

Now that the Switch is the one system they're developing for moving forward, that problem going to be addressed emphatically. Even if they will have released most of their major 1st party franchises by the end of the year, the Switch will still have a consistent release schedule to keep the games and releases, from established franchises, new IPs, (Astral Chain, Daemon X Machina), and franchises still not on the Switch yet (Bayonetta, SMT, Metroid, Tomodachi) flowing and sales stay consistent. Like I was saying in a past thread about how PS5/Scarlett wouldn't effect Switch sales - The Switch is now starting to reach the point in its life span where it is now going to start selling to the mainstream audience that would wait for a video game system to get a price cut and a healthy library before jumping on board, which is what is now starting to happen.

In years 1 & 2, the Switch was selling primarily to the Nintendo diehards who are loyal to the brand. Now that they're all on board, Nintendo is shifting gears with its targeting and marketing. (Guess what... BOTW2 doesn't need to sell as many systems as BOTW did because at that point, the Switch will be selling largely off of the library it has already built in addition to being at a much lower price point than it was at launch.)

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

As for the point of how every Nintendo post SNES, with the exception of the DS, having problems selling after year 3. That has in large part to do with problems and issues with the systems themselves.

N64 - Game development and support outside of Nintendo and Rare stopped due to the limitations and costs of cartridge development back then, causing every major 3rd party developer that was on the NES/SNES to jump to the PS1. (COUGH*FinalFantasyVII*COUGH)

GCN - The mini-disk format limited development and memory, no built in wi-fi support at a time where online play was emerging, 1st party games took a noticeable drop in quality and appeal from the N64 (Mario 64 > Mario Sunshine; Ocarina of Time > Wind Waker (and the backlash that came with it); Star Fox 64 > The Legend of Star Fox and Star Fox Assault), it looked very "kiddie" compared to its "cool" competition (COUGH*PurpleLunchbox*COUGH), Nintendo blew their load to early with the price by dropping it to $99 by September 2003, (not even 2 years old yet), which they did in large part due to competing directly with the greatest selling video game system of all time, the PS2, that was just better in single aspect except graphics... and even THEN that wasn't a selling point, because if you wanted a PS2 with better graphics, you could just get the Xbox. The GameCube had next to nothing going for it. It was the Smash Bros. Melee and Metroid Prime machine.

Wii - The appeal and wow factor of motion controls started dying off quickly after 2009 once fans and developers realized it was just a gimmick instead of a natural progression. Support and development for the HD twins ramping up which reduced the Wii's support to nothing more than shovelware and motion gimmick games outside of Nintendo's 1st party offerings. As the 7th gen progressed and we got to see more and more of what the 360 and PS3 could do and with no legitimate counterpoint (like portability), everyone quickly began to realize just how horribly outdated the Wii was from a technical and hardware standpoint. Piss-poor and pathetic online play for almost every game that tried it outside of Mario Kart Wii. By late gen, the casual audience that bulked the Wii's early sales left in droves for smartphones and mobile gaming, and they haven't been back since. 

3DS - The gimmick of the system was completely worthless and unappealing. That, along with a poor launch were the reasons why Nintendo cut the price by a whopping $80 just 5 months after it launched. While this helped sales pick up tremendously, especially once the games started kicking in, this also caused the 3DS to peak early. It's best selling years were years 3, 2, and 1, in that order. And even after the price cut, the hardware was still underwhelming and unappealing thanks to a pointless gimmick. Add those points onto a booming smartphone/mobile game market that greatly evaporated the dedicated handheld market, and you have a system that was fighting a losing battle from the start.

Wii U - I could be here all night describing what was wrong with THIS one. 

Now let's look at the Switch:

It has all the 1st party support that used to go to 2 separate Nintendo systems, in addition to the handheld 3rd party support the GBA, DS, and 3DS enjoyed. It's gimmick is actually interesting and appealing, unlike the 3DS, its cartridge development is justified and getting Japanese 3rd party support that's actually worth a damn, unlike the N64, 1st party offerings are better than ever and it doesn't have a "kiddie" label attached to it, unlike the GameCube, AND it is a perfectly justifiable reason as to why it's not as powerful as Sony and Microsoft's systems, it gets western 3rd party support that's actually worth a damn, AND its gimmick has long lasting appeal that feels like a natural evolution/progression of gaming and won't fade into obscurity, unlike the Wii.  

Bottom line: Every Nintendo system since the SNES, outside of the DS (and Game Boy Color), struggled and dropped noticeably in sales after the 3rd year for many reasons, but mostly because the systems themselves, from hardware and technical viewpoints, were either mediocre (N64, GCN, Wii) or just plain sucked (3DS, Wii U). The Switch is actually the first console SINCE the SNES where the system itself is just as great as the games it has. Certainly far above what the N64 through Wii U were and above what the 3DS was. Ironically enough, the only other system Nintendo has released between the SNES and Switch where the hardware was probably just as great as the software... was the DS... the best selling Nintendo system ever. Yeah, I'm pretty sure the Switch will do great and reach heights far above what the 3DS ever hoped to achieve, assuming Nintendo isn't stupid enough to cut its life short.

Last edited by PAOerfulone - on 18 July 2019

Around the Network

I'm actually glad they chose this route instead of going with a power-boosted "Pro", I don't want games from late this year onwards on to start running like shit on my 2017 Switch. In this way i feel these kind of upgrades inevitably ending up screwing over the larger userbase of the standard model.

Just gimme another 4 years of the Switch then a much more capable full successor.



I don't think the 3DS was really by design supposed to have a life cycle that long given its actual sales, but there wasn't dick all Nintendo could really do.

The Wii U died prematurely and the Switch which would adopt the hybrid approach wouldn't be ready until 2017 ... there really wasn't much of a choice in the matter but to support the 3DS, even though its shipment numbers by 2016/17 were fairly low overall.

Pokemon Go came out of nowhere and gave the general brand a bit of a boost there which the 3DS capitalized a little bit on in its final years.



Getting back to the actual Switch model, it wouldn't surprise me if Nintendo eventually "quietly" allows devs to take advantage of the extra performance, as there almost certainly is a boost due to the power savings.

It means it may well be possible for developers to run docked mode performance portably now on this model. They could offer a "performance mode" for example that would really help out games like Xenoblade when played portably.

For docked mode, this version of the Switch should be be able to hit full 500 GFLOPS at least I think, the current Switch is gimped at 379 GFLOPS or so because the 20nm Tegra gets too hot, but this (likely) Mariko processor is probably 16nm, so it can run that at full tilt no problem. There are reports that data mine leaks show the max clock of the Mariko at 20% higher than the old Tegra X1 to boot so who knows maybe it can even go higher than 500 GFLOPS docked.



I already have a ps4, I have zero interest in Nintendo making their console a ps4. I don't need two of the same thing. I am thankfully Nintendo does their own thing.



OTBWY said:
Ah so it is a Switch Pro. I'm so happy that this Switch Pro is launching too, I kinda want more life out of my Switch when playing undocked, so the Switch Pro is excellent. 4.5 to 9 hours on this new Switch Pro is excellent. Can't wait for the Switch Pro to launch, here we go Switch Pro!

Switch Pro.

SWITCH PRO! Ready to turn PRO with the SWITCH PRO? Quit your jobs because SWITCH PRO! Don’t stick with the loser edition, SWITCH to the SWITCH PRO baby! SWITCH PRO!

I don’t know about you poindexters! You Gonna SWITCH PRO or you gonna stay schmo? This August: I’m! F***ING! Gaming! with SWITCH PRO!!!!!

Hey yo! PRO up and SWITCH to SWITCH PRO!



I describe myself as a little dose of toxic masculinity.