By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Nintendo Discussion - Nintendo Switch Lite Officially Revealed - $199, September 20th, Dedicated Handheld

I dig the price, form factor and concept, but I feel like they released this a bit too early. Battery life is not going to be good enough.



Around the Network
Barkley said:
Chrkeller said:
Again you are missing the point, perhaps intentionally. $250 has been a baseline for portable gaming devices with the PSP and Vita... The Switch has taken the portable gaming device, added functionality and slightly increased the cost. Calling the Switch overpriced is absurd. It is in line with where portables have been.

You can only compare devices that are contemporaries with each other to determine value. 

There really isn't a contemporary device in which to compare. 



Chrkeller said:
Barkley said:

You can only compare devices that are contemporaries with each other to determine value. 

There really isn't a contemporary device in which to compare. 

True, which just means that in that sense it's valuable and not overpriced.

Production costs is the other thing we can look at. "Thanks to a new report from Japanese firm Fomalhaut, we now know that the manufacturing cost for the Nintendo Switch is roughly $257"

So the Switch at launch cost $257 to make and was sold at $299, clearly not overpriced. 



Chrkeller said:
Random_Matt said:
People defend a chip that came out in 2014 saying it is not overpriced, wow. Nvidia ripped Nintendo off as they do with everyone, then Nintendo decided to rip off consumers as well. It is not even close to being worth the retail price, clueless.

The PSP was $250.  In comparison the Switch offers:

1) Better graphics

2) Larger screen

3) Higher resolution screen

4) Removable controllers

5) Ability to play at home via a dock

6) Touch Screen

7) Dual Analog

And the conclusion is the Switch is overpriced?  Yeah, you are clueless.  I love how Nintendo is suppose to offer easily the stronger dedicated portable gaming device, while having functionality at home, but some how the price should be less than the PSP.....  

Nope, I know how much tech components etc cost. You measure it however you want cupcake. I salute you on your defensive though, gotta bring in a Sony product which nobody was even discussing (For the record, that was a con as well)

Moderated - think-man

Last edited by think-man - on 11 July 2019

Marth said:


If Switch was overpriced nobody would buy it, its as simple as that.

I wouldn't got that far. People buy Macs and Iphones.



Around the Network
RolStoppable said:

When a large enough number of people is willing to pay the asking price for a luxury product, then it isn't overpriced. People are free to say that a product is too expensive for them, but that doesn't lead to an objective conclusion of a product being overpriced.

I guess really there isn't a singular definition for "overpriced".

If people are buying it, it's not overpriced for the market, but if the price is ridiculous high compared to it's production costs it's overpriced compared to it's value.

I don't care how many people buy the $999 Mac Pro stand, it probably costs apple $100 max to make, it's overpriced.

So there's overpriced in terms of raw value, overpriced in terms of market acceptance and overpriced in terms of functional value. So it depends which one you're going for I guess.



Well this should pretty much completely phase out the 3DS then.. Was surprised not to hear about any sort of apparent improved hardware, even the screen display or the like. Colors look pretty blah.. Grey looks ok I guess, though they should just release a black and Wii-style slick white along with it. I like that they added an actual d-pad finally. Now can we get separate joycons with a real d-pad? As a Switch owner there's absolutely no point in this for me, but I guess I could see how it could draw in some new buyers. 



 

"We hold these truths to be self-evident - all men and women created by the, go-you know.. you know the thing!" - Joe Biden

Barkley said:
KLXVER said:

Does it have a better battery life though? If so, how much better is it?

3-7 hours instead of 2.5-6.5 hours. Not a massive increase but a bit better.

Did they really improve the battery, it just seems to have the same battery but because it is smaller and use less features it needs less of the battery. Not that I am complaining but an improved battery would have been welcome.






RolStoppable said:
Barkley said:

I guess really there isn't a singular definition for "overpriced".

If people are buying it, it's not overpriced for the market, but if the price is ridiculous high compared to it's production costs it's overpriced compared to it's value.

I don't care how many people buy the $999 Mac Pro stand, it probably costs apple $100 max to make, it's overpriced.

So there's overpriced in terms of raw value, overpriced in terms of market acceptance and overpriced in terms of functional value. So it depends which one you're going for I guess.

Using production costs to settle the question for entertainment products doesn't really make sense. When the original Star Wars trilogy gets released on Blu-ray, it's sold for a much, much higher price than it costs to manufacture the discs and packaging, but what people are really paying for is the movies. When people buy a console, it's not about the cost of the individual parts, but rather about which library of games they get access to, because there's no point in buying a console without the intention to buy games.

The example of the Mac Pro stand is a bit strange, because I very much doubt that that thing sells well enough to not be labeled overpriced, so it's unnecessary to take an approach different to the one I outlined in my previous post. It's overpriced any way you slice it.

No, using production costs to justify how high the price may have been is quite valid.

Using production costs to argue that it should have a lower price would fit more in-line with your argument and examples.

Regardless of any perceived value, at a very least, companies are frequently advised to sell their products expensive enough to recoup production costs. Selling at a loss typically is only done in order to encourage sales and hope those losses are recouped via software. Then, any additional MSRP above production cost comes down to perceived value.



 SW-5120-1900-6153

Excellent move by Nintendo! I love that it has a dpad! The price is great!

I would to try to sell mine (original Switch) and buy one if it could connect to a tv.