Quantcast
Offical Sell-in numbers for PS3 - credit to ArmGunar.

Forums - Sony Discussion - Offical Sell-in numbers for PS3 - credit to ArmGunar.

potato_hamster said:
Dulfite said:

Why didn't you include Nintendo?

Maybe he was low on whatever essential oil promotes bringing irrelevant things into the conversation.

"I wonder if the Xbox 360 ended up selling more than the PS3?"

"I don't think so. Microsoft's numbers might be a few years older, but they probably would have said something about it in some type of xbox promotional thing over the years!"

"but why didn't you bring up Nintendo?"

It doesn't matter. It has zero bearing on the conversation taking place.


Ok? Harsh, much? I just asked a simple question. Also, what does essential oils have to do with any of this?



Around the Network

So more than 87m. Not a bad number for being the worst selling PlayStation console.



twintail said:
Dulfite said:

Why didn't you include Nintendo?

Because his discussion is not about Nintendo.

What a ridiculous thing to ask

The discussion appeared to be about the 7th gen consoles, not 2 out of 3 of them, so I don't know why my question is ridiculous?



Dulfite said:
twintail said:

Because his discussion is not about Nintendo.

What a ridiculous thing to ask

The discussion appeared to be about the 7th gen consoles, not 2 out of 3 of them, so I don't know why my question is ridiculous?

The conversation was about whether or not the Xbox 360 or the PS3 ended up selling more. Just because the phrase "7th gen" was used doesn't mean it was about all 7th gen consoles.

What essential oil do you recommend for better reading comprehension?



potato_hamster said:
Dulfite said:

The discussion appeared to be about the 7th gen consoles, not 2 out of 3 of them, so I don't know why my question is ridiculous?

The conversation was about whether or not the Xbox 360 or the PS3 ended up selling more. Just because the phrase "7th gen" was used doesn't mean it was about all 7th gen consoles.

What essential oil do you recommend for better reading comprehension?

Nothing in the OP or post since then, prior to the one I originally commented on, said this was a conversation about only Xbox and Playstation. In fact, it seemed to be just about the Playstation, but then the one comment specifically compared the ps3 and 360 sales, and I didn't know why they didn't include Nintendo's since they were comparing 7th generation. Regardless, I can tell having a conversation with you is going to be pointless as you continue to attack me. Have a pleasant day.



Around the Network
Evilms said:

-Image-

Is the image you provided made by Sony?

Soren0079 said:
Daniel Ahmad on Twitter pointed out the errors in Sony's report, particularly 4 million ps2 sales after 2012 that were lumped in with the ps3 sales.

That's unfortunate...
I hope they give us updated numbers for those systems,

Dulfite said:
potato_hamster said:

The conversation was about whether or not the Xbox 360 or the PS3 ended up selling more. Just because the phrase "7th gen" was used doesn't mean it was about all 7th gen consoles.

What essential oil do you recommend for better reading comprehension?

Nothing in the OP or post since then, prior to the one I originally commented on, said this was a conversation about only Xbox and Playstation. In fact, it seemed to be just about the Playstation, but then the one comment specifically compared the ps3 and 360 sales, and I didn't know why they didn't include Nintendo's since they were comparing 7th generation. Regardless, I can tell having a conversation with you is going to be pointless as you continue to attack me. Have a pleasant day.

Ok so from my understanding, the conversation is about PS3 vs 360 because at one point it looked like they would end neck and neck, and then PS3 seemingly passed it by a bit. But some people still doubted that PS3 even passed the 360 at all, from what I've seen.
According to Sony's latest numbers, PS3 ended up almost 2m ahead of what we presume is the final number for 360. Meaning if that's correct then there should be no doubt that PS3 passed the 360. Unless Microsoft tell us otherwise. but they probably would have done that already if it really did end up beating PS3.

No one is contesting that Wii outsold both of them by a comfortable amount, which is why it isn't brought up in the conversation.



Hiku said:
Evilms said:

-Image-

Is the image you provided made by Sony?

Soren0079 said:
Daniel Ahmad on Twitter pointed out the errors in Sony's report, particularly 4 million ps2 sales after 2012 that were lumped in with the ps3 sales.

That's unfortunate...
I hope they give us updated numbers for those systems,

Dulfite said:

Nothing in the OP or post since then, prior to the one I originally commented on, said this was a conversation about only Xbox and Playstation. In fact, it seemed to be just about the Playstation, but then the one comment specifically compared the ps3 and 360 sales, and I didn't know why they didn't include Nintendo's since they were comparing 7th generation. Regardless, I can tell having a conversation with you is going to be pointless as you continue to attack me. Have a pleasant day.

Ok so from my understanding, the conversation is about PS3 vs 360 because at one point it looked like they would end neck and neck, and then PS3 seemingly passed it by a bit. But some people still doubted that PS3 even passed the 360 at all, from what I've seen.
According to Sony's latest numbers, PS3 ended up almost 2m ahead of what we presume is the final number for 360. Meaning if that's correct then there should be no doubt that PS3 passed the 360. Unless Microsoft tell us otherwise. but they probably would have done that already if it really did end up beating PS3.

No one is contesting that Wii outsold both of them by a comfortable amount, which is why it isn't brought up in the conversation.

That's exactly it



JRPGfan said:
vivster said:
I'm sure they could've squeezed the Vita numbers in between the lines.

Honestly think Sony are ashamed of it...... it was over designed, and thus overpriced, with features that wherent really needed.
It didnt sell so well, so they arnt gonna list it next to things that are worth mentioning if they can avoid it.

That explains why they show the PSP but not the Vita.
Its nots a home console vs handheld thingy (cuz then why have the PSP shown?).
Its a "we re pretending the vita wasnt ever a thing" thing.


The irony is I liked the system... but its not hard for me to admit it was a flawed system.
It sony ever does a handheld again, I hope they dont make the same mistakes.

The PSP really was just better than the Vita for its time.  It even had a quasi Switch feature with the PSP Go that was kinda lame given that it was digital only.  PSP support for PS1 was better than the Vita ffs.  Still loved my Vita though, for Vita games, when I was still doing portable gaming.



A warrior keeps death on the mind from the moment of his first breath to the moment of his last.



Dulfite said:
Azuren said:
This puts the official 7th Gen numbers at 87.4m for PS3 and 84m for 360.

Of course the last official 360 numbers were in 2014, so it could have still ended ahead of PS3. The ball is in Microsoft's court.

Why didn't you include Nintendo?

Aside from Nintendo winning by a large margin, Nintendo claiming multiple times they weren't competing with Sony/Microsoft, 7th Gen largely being represented by the level of performance shown by PS360, and PS360 being so close it needed a photo finish?

Because I wasn't talking about Nintendo.



Watch me stream games and hunt trophies on my Twitch channel!

Check out my Twitch Channel!:

www.twitch.tv/AzurenGames

Why are PSP numbers so outdated?
Is that official info? I still often see guys saying the 360 outsold the PS3, so that would be good to stop that, even as we all already knew it.