He makes references to what Ben's said but doesn't seem to make any direct references to the book. Go further? The 'interview' was already over 15 minutes. How long does it take to get to the point? Obviously Ben has all day to sit and be whipped, because who doesn't?
Let's have a party. I'll bring the excuses and you can bring the spin and denial. Better yet, let's record it, post it online, and call it an interview...
How do we know if he would have gotten to any other parts of the book since Ben couldn't take the first few questions. If you are going to be someone who throws around your opinion like an AX then maybe you should also be just as good when confronted on those opinions. If the expected behaviour is that you get upset and mad then you did not perform to your own level. The fact you keep defending Ben when even he doesn't defend his attitude himself shows more about you then Ben.
I will keep spinning and denying your opinion and you can continue to be the apologist with the bucket full of excuses. I am more than happy to record that for you.
Well I would know, if he started asking legit questions, and continued to ask legit questions. The interviewer had every chance to focus on the book, but he did anything but. How Ben reacts is his problem, not the interviewers. That's how you should know.
Glad you finally admitted it. It's the first step to curing yourself.