By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

So it appears that Floyd and the cop that put his knee on his neck, Chauvin both worked at the same club. It would appear that these 2 may have a history beyond the incident.



Around the Network
KLAMarine said:
Otter said:

Before I answer that question, what exact point are you trying to establish by asking it? 

I'm wondering if CaptainExplosion is going to call out Lebron or Colin on their double standards...

Mmm, no, there are no double standards. There have been plenty of deaths between this and the last spat of riots and political unrests, people both black and white. The two people you referenced haven't addessed each individually. What they have done is rally against police brutality which effects black people and white, its not a double standard that they're practicing. By your logic they have to speak on every single death, which misses the point.

Whats clear though is that if anyone wants to push the conversation in this direction, they don't care about the well being of anyone involved. They just want to one up someone else, or find bone to pick because a political movement about holding authority to account.



KLAMarine said:
Otter said:


But don't get me wrong, we don't know who the person is for sure but this is the only actual evidence we have on his identity. And under close scrutiny its quite convincing.


Using my x-ray vision, I can confirm the man in the gas mask is officer Jacob Pederson! Yep!

No x-ray vision needed to see how the profile of the eyes & bridge fit. But this may very well be the wrong person, naturally if this is an undercover cop, police are not going to investigate so people are doing the work themselves. But I guess his identity shouldn't distract from the point 

Does this person appear to be a protestor to you? The the expensive gear, gloves, umbrella... even the manner in which breaks the windows. Seems very off, like someone proffessionally employed. For sure if he is an undercover officer that deserved to be brought to light. 



Otter said:
KLAMarine said:

I'm wondering if CaptainExplosion is going to call out Lebron or Colin on their double standards...

Mmm, no, there are no double standards. There have been plenty of deaths between this and the last spat of riots and political unrests, people both black and white. The two people you referenced haven't addessed each individually. What they have done is rally against police brutality which effects black people and white, its not a double standard that they're practicing. By your logic they have to speak on every single death, which misses the point.

Whats clear though is that if anyone wants to push the conversation in this direction, they don't care about the well being of anyone involved. They just want to one up someone else, or find bone to pick because a political movement about holding authority to account.

Then join me in telling CaptainExplosion the double standard he refers to might only exist in his head...

Otter said:
KLAMarine said:

Using my x-ray vision, I can confirm the man in the gas mask is officer Jacob Pederson! Yep!

No x-ray vision needed to see how the profile of the eyes & bridge fit. But this may very well be the wrong person, naturally if this is an undercover cop, police are not going to investigate so people are doing the work themselves. But I guess his identity shouldn't distract from the point 

Does this person appear to be a protestor to you? The the expensive gear, gloves, umbrella... even the manner in which breaks the windows. Seems very off, like someone proffessionally employed. For sure if he is an undercover officer that deserved to be brought to light. 

"No x-ray vision needed to see how the profile of the eyes & bridge fit."

>People have more than a bridge and eyes on their face. We need more distinguishing factors and a less blurry photo.

"Does this person appear to be a protestor to you?"

>Protestors come in all shapes and sizes. They don't wear uniforms or name tags...

"The the expensive gear, gloves, umbrella..."

>Holy shit, gear, gloves, and an umbrella! Only undercover cops have those!

"even the manner in which breaks the windows. Seems very off, like someone proffessionally employed. For sure if he is an undercover officer that deserved to be brought to light."

>How does one train to become a professional window breaker?



KLAMarine said:

Then join me in telling CaptainExplosion the double standard he refers to might only exist in his head...

>People have more than a bridge and eyes on their face. We need more distinguishing factors and a less blurry photo."No x-ray vision needed to see how the profile of the eyes & bridge fit."


"Does this person appear to be a protestor to you?"

>Protestors come in all shapes and sizes. They don't wear uniforms or name tags...

"The the expensive gear, gloves, umbrella..."

>Holy shit, gear, gloves, and an umbrella! Only undercover cops have those!

"even the manner in which breaks the windows. Seems very off, like someone proffessionally employed. For sure if he is an undercover officer that deserved to be brought to light."

>How does one train to become a professional window breaker?

Regarding the first part, no. I mean their is clearly racial bias against black people in places where it matters most, like their likelyhood to be murdered by police which is highly disproportionate. This is not only supported by statistics, but also by people experiences and the accounts reported. 90% of them (police murders) go under the radar, unrelated to race.

Regarding the second part, so you think this person is a genuine protestor? Not everything has to be argument, to me and many others, his demeanor and prep seems way off, make a judgement call for yourself. But you'll notice that he stands alone out like a sore thumb in all the footage you'll see.

"The man wore clean, full-body coverings. He had a large umbrella to shelter him from overhead surveillance. He had one job. He brought a hammer. He was calm & methodical. He acted, then exited, avoiding to engage." Like its just strange and reason for suspicion

Last edited by Otter - on 29 May 2020

Around the Network

Yes undercover cops always aim to act like they're professionally employed. Especially when utilizing your hard trained window-breaking tactics. Best way to blend in and not seem suspicious.



"When the looting starts, the shooting starts.". -- Donald Trump.



KiigelHeart said:
Yes undercover cops always aim to act like they're professionally employed. Especially when utilizing your hard trained window-breaking tactics. Best way to blend in and not seem suspicious.

Lol, just as real cops don't always do their job well, who said undercover cops would? And whats you're take, you think thats just a protestor?



Otter said:
KiigelHeart said:
Yes undercover cops always aim to act like they're professionally employed. Especially when utilizing your hard trained window-breaking tactics. Best way to blend in and not seem suspicious.

Lol, just as real cops don't always do their job well, who said undercover cops would? And whats you're take, you think thats just a protestor?

A protestor, some random lunatic, maybe someone with a political agenda or a police officer using his ex-wifes gasmask?

I'll go with lunatic, he moves and walks like some military wannabe kind of nutcase but who knows..

So you think he's been sent there by the police department or is he doing this on his dayoff? 



Otter said:
KLAMarine said:

Then join me in telling CaptainExplosion the double standard he refers to might only exist in his head...

>People have more than a bridge and eyes on their face. We need more distinguishing factors and a less blurry photo."No x-ray vision needed to see how the profile of the eyes & bridge fit."


"Does this person appear to be a protestor to you?"

>Protestors come in all shapes and sizes. They don't wear uniforms or name tags...

"The the expensive gear, gloves, umbrella..."

>Holy shit, gear, gloves, and an umbrella! Only undercover cops have those!

"even the manner in which breaks the windows. Seems very off, like someone proffessionally employed. For sure if he is an undercover officer that deserved to be brought to light."

>How does one train to become a professional window breaker?

Regarding the first part, no. I mean their is clearly racial bias against black people in places where it matters most, like their likelyhood to be murdered by police which is highly disproportionate. This is not only supported by statistics, but also by people experiences and the accounts reported. 90% of them (police murders) go under the radar, unrelated to race.

Regarding the second part, so you think this person is a genuine protestor? Not everything has to be argument, to me and many others, his demeanor and prep seems way off, make a judgement call for yourself. But you'll notice that he stands alone out like a sore thumb in all the footage you'll see.

"The man wore clean, full-body coverings. He had a large umbrella to shelter him from overhead surveillance. He had one job. He brought a hammer. He was calm & methodical. He acted, then exited, avoiding to engage." Like its just strange and reason for suspicion

"Regarding the first part, no. I mean their is clearly racial bias against black people in places where it matters most, like their likelyhood to be murdered by police which is highly disproportionate. This is not only supported by statistics, but also by people experiences and the accounts reported. 90% of them (police murders) go under the radar, unrelated to race."

>On the bit about statistics, ever heard of 'correlation does not equal causation'?

"Regarding the second part, so you think this person is a genuine protestor? Not everything has to be argument, to me and many others, his demeanor and prep seems way off, make a judgement call for yourself."

>I really don't know and who gives a shit? He smashed some windows and then pissed off. Why should anyone besides that store honestly care!?

"But you'll notice that he stands alone out like a sore thumb in all the footage you'll see."

>Yeah, I think the umbrella does that.

"The man wore clean, full-body coverings. He had a large umbrella to shelter him from overhead surveillance. He had one job. He brought a hammer. He was calm & methodical. He acted, then exited, avoiding to engage." Like its just strange and reason for suspicion"

>Still proves nothing beyond his being suspicious.