By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Snoopy said:
jason1637 said:

No were starting to reopen because states have enough ppe and other suppliers to make sure their healthcare system isn't overun. We needed the lockdown to buy us time ao our systems can handle the influx of people so less people can die.

And it doesn't matter if these people had underling issues they are still people and deserve the rigjt to life and we shouldn't throw them under the bus. You can believe in  natural selection if you want but because of the lockdowns states were able to be better equipped to handle "natural selection ".

Hospitals are still and always will be overrun thanks to ridiculous government regulations put in the first place with or without lockdown. There is no way around this issue unless the government ends a lot of these silly over the top laws and don't embrace the free market. This is why healthcare is so expensive in the first place.

Well they are in a much better position now. More PPE, ventilaters, beds etc.



Around the Network
jason1637 said:
Snoopy said:

Hospitals are still and always will be overrun thanks to ridiculous government regulations put in the first place with or without lockdown. There is no way around this issue unless the government ends a lot of these silly over the top laws and don't embrace the free market. This is why healthcare is so expensive in the first place.

Well they are in a much better position now. More PPE, ventilaters, beds etc.

Nope, they are going to be in a much worse position because the economy tanked which leads to more people going to doctors/hospital due to many issues such as and not limited to  mental issues, stress heart attacks, people prolonging issues, ect. Not to mention people won't be able to pay their bills causing hospitals to bleed resources.



Snoopy said:
jason1637 said:

Well they are in a much better position now. More PPE, ventilaters, beds etc.

Nope, they are going to be in a much worse position because the economy tanked which leads to more people going to doctors/hospital due to many issues such as and not limited to  mental issues, stress heart attacks, people prolonging issues, ect. Not to mention people won't be able to pay their bills causing hospitals to bleed resources.

Well according to the CDC no such thing happened during the last recession. Rates stayed flat.

https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/products/databriefs/db182.htm



jason1637 said:
Snoopy said:

Nope, they are going to be in a much worse position because the economy tanked which leads to more people going to doctors/hospital due to many issues such as and not limited to  mental issues, stress heart attacks, people prolonging issues, ect. Not to mention people won't be able to pay their bills causing hospitals to bleed resources.

Well according to the CDC no such thing happened during the last recession. Rates stayed flat.

https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/products/databriefs/db182.htm

https://www.pnas.org/content/106/41/17290

And here's an article about how the great depression didn't affect mortality other than suicides increasing, but overall deaths were actually down and population health was up. 

It makes intuitive sense to say that economic turmoil could cause more deaths than Covid, and that's why leaders who don't want to deal with this pandemic like to repeat that claim over and over again but I've yet to see evidence of such a claim. 



...

Torillian said:
jason1637 said:

Well according to the CDC no such thing happened during the last recession. Rates stayed flat.

https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/products/databriefs/db182.htm

https://www.pnas.org/content/106/41/17290

And here's an article about how the great depression didn't affect mortality other than suicides increasing, but overall deaths were actually down and population health was up. 

It makes intuitive sense to say that economic turmoil could cause more deaths than Covid, and that's why leaders who don't want to deal with this pandemic like to repeat that claim over and over again but I've yet to see evidence of such a claim. 

Actually, outpatient growth is increasing significantly over the years. Since people don't have as much money to pay their hospital bills, hospitals end up cuttings costs/resources which mean they can't keep up with the in demand of patients with limited resource. You also have to remember most hospitals are non profit so they don't have a lot of money to back themselves up in this crisis.

Lastly, people are more inclined to not go to a hospital when they need to which in return might kill them or make the situation way worse and end up costing the hospital more money and more time.

Also, the death rate increase in homicide too during great recession.

https://www.beckershospitalreview.com/finance/a-recession-is-coming-what-it-could-mean-for-healthcare.html

"Violent crime rates may have risen at first during the Depression (in 1933, nationwide homicide mortality rate hit a high for the century until that point, at 9.7 per 100,000 people) but the trend did not continue throughout the decade. As the economy showed signs of recovery in 1934-37, the homicide rate went down by 20 percent."

Last edited by Snoopy - on 25 May 2020

Around the Network
Snoopy said:
jason1637 said:

Dudes these people arent just percentages. Close too 100,000 people dead. Think about that number dude. Imagine how many families and friends are grieving right now. Now without lockdowns it could be in the millions which would be even more heartbreaking. 

Also driving a car and walking were not illegal. You can still do these things with lockdowns. 

Dude imagine the hundreds of millions of people losing everything and possibly going homeless. Not to mention the suicides, anxiety, heart attacks from financial stress, and death from the increase in criminal activities, ect. Whether you like it or not, the economy has a bigger impact on people lives than the coronavirus.

I love this argument. Arguing that stress from not being able to work will kill so many people from suicides and an increase in stress related conditions, but completely ignoring the stress from continuing to work in the middle of a pandemic. Ask any essential worker just how relaxed they've been over the last couple months, and I promise you that this has not been a walk in the park for us. It would be much worse were the government to openly support using us as cannon fodder, killing hundreds of thousands more.

Then you go on to say that the economy has a bigger impact on people's lives than the coronavirus, which too looks at the negative economic impact of a lockdown in which 100,000 people still die, while ignoring the negative economic impact of avoiding a lockdown causing a significant amount of increased deaths. Unless you are literally forcing people to work, I would wager you would have a lot of businesses shutting down, failing and workers refusing to show over a much greater period of time. Without the expanded safety nets which have been put into place, this would have been much more difficult to move forward from.

Your sociopathic writhing is not only murderous and vile, but it is unlikely to have a positive effect on the economy. The best course of action for the economy would have been leaning much harder into the lockdown and doing it sooner, so we could have cut this off at its roots before it became a nationwide disaster, and opened up more quickly.



coolbeans said:
vivster said:

It actually has not much to do with color. What Biden means is perfectly encapsulated in this subreddit.

https://www.reddit.com/r/LeopardsAteMyFace/

tldr; it's not a good idea to vote for a politician who wants only the worst for you.

Okay.  I'll give credit that you're not taking the more pernicious line of thinking there.  

The problem being: this is where boldly attesting this behavior runs into huge speed bumps when actually looking at raw data before this pandemic.  For someone who seems intent on wanting the worst against blacks, you're totally blundering your intent when historically low black unemployment happens during your "reign."  Not to mention in relation to the most productive of any racial category, taking a more adversarial stance on regulations gets you to net talking points like black/Hispanic entrepreneurship.  You've gotta be a huge fuck-up to have such egregious intent and fumble this hard on something that's been historically so easy to do in the US. 

Ironically, a detached outsider of partisan politics would seem anxious to share records of prominent US cities that've been historically Dem. safe havens in that reddit thread.  But, of course, all kinds of defensive maneuvers are drawn up when those observations are made.

It was my mistake to insinuate that Donald Trump has any intent whatsoever. I would never claim that. Of course Donald Trump has no ill intent for black people, he doesn't have any intent at all, except for satisfying whatever narcissistic urges happen to be in his sorry excuse for a brain at the moment.

Donald Trump with his actions and the Republican party as a whole are generally bad news for anyone earning less than a million in a year. I'd say that encompasses about 99% of black people in the US. So yeah, Donald Trump is bad news for the vast majority of black people. Just like he's bad news for the vast majority of people, including the majority of people who voted for him.

It's typical reality detached thinking of Republican fans that having a job means doing well. I'm sure those newly employed black people are having a blast with their low wage jobs, no health insurance and all that cool systemic racism.



If you demand respect or gratitude for your volunteer work, you're doing volunteering wrong.

Snoopy said:
Torillian said:

https://www.pnas.org/content/106/41/17290

And here's an article about how the great depression didn't affect mortality other than suicides increasing, but overall deaths were actually down and population health was up. 

It makes intuitive sense to say that economic turmoil could cause more deaths than Covid, and that's why leaders who don't want to deal with this pandemic like to repeat that claim over and over again but I've yet to see evidence of such a claim. 

Actually, outpatient growth is increasing significantly over the years. Since people don't have as much money to pay their hospital bills, hospitals end up cuttings costs/resources which mean they can't keep up with the in demand of patients with limited resource. You also have to remember most hospitals are non profit so they don't have a lot of money to back themselves up in this crisis.

Lastly, people are more inclined to not go to a hospital when they need to which in return might kill them or make the situation way worse and end up costing the hospital more money and more time.

Also, the death rate increase in homicide too during great recession.

https://www.beckershospitalreview.com/finance/a-recession-is-coming-what-it-could-mean-for-healthcare.html

"Violent crime rates may have risen at first during the Depression (in 1933, nationwide homicide mortality rate hit a high for the century until that point, at 9.7 per 100,000 people) but the trend did not continue throughout the decade. As the economy showed signs of recovery in 1934-37, the homicide rate went down by 20 percent."

Those violent crime rates are mainly because alcohol prohibition from 1920-1933 which led to numerous gang wars.  Sure the depression might of had something to do with it but to ignore the main contributing factor is just flat misleading.  Notice how prohibition ended in 1933.

The US economy was still sputturing till about 1939 around the start of WW2.



sethnintendo said:
Snoopy said:

Actually, outpatient growth is increasing significantly over the years. Since people don't have as much money to pay their hospital bills, hospitals end up cuttings costs/resources which mean they can't keep up with the in demand of patients with limited resource. You also have to remember most hospitals are non profit so they don't have a lot of money to back themselves up in this crisis.

Lastly, people are more inclined to not go to a hospital when they need to which in return might kill them or make the situation way worse and end up costing the hospital more money and more time.

Also, the death rate increase in homicide too during great recession.

https://www.beckershospitalreview.com/finance/a-recession-is-coming-what-it-could-mean-for-healthcare.html

"Violent crime rates may have risen at first during the Depression (in 1933, nationwide homicide mortality rate hit a high for the century until that point, at 9.7 per 100,000 people) but the trend did not continue throughout the decade. As the economy showed signs of recovery in 1934-37, the homicide rate went down by 20 percent."

Those violent crime rates are mainly because alcohol prohibition from 1920-1933 which led to numerous gang wars.  Sure the depression might of had something to do with it but to ignore the main contributing factor is just flat misleading.  Notice how prohibition ended in 1933.

The US economy was still sputturing till about 1939 around the start of WW2.

Yes, because poor people don't resort to criminal activities. That is why poor areas of america are essentially crime free. Also, it may have to do with something with the economy doing better as indicated by the article.



Also snoopy that graph was already increasing exponentially before the recession.