So you're going to totally forget we already had this conversation several times on this forum, huh?   Ok, you brought it up.  All these are quotes from me.

"The lack of an investigation into Burisma (and others) was the reason Shokin was removed. It was because he wasn't investigating...not because he was investigating. The IMF loaned Ukraine billions of which much was being funneled into offshore accounts. Shokin was supposed to investigate those. He didn't. This is why the international community, including the US, was pressuring for his removal. "

"And who do you think was supposed to investigate the missing IMF money? Prosecutor Viktor Shokin. And he did not do the investigation. In fact, he did not do a lot of investigations. 1 of the investigations he was supposed to do but didn't was the investigation into Burisma. This is why the US, Canada, UK, EU, World Bank and IMF all wanted Shokin fired. It wasn't just Biden."

"You seem to think Prosecutor Shokin was fired because he was investigating Burisma (which Hunter Biden happen to be a board member of). BUT, that's not why he was fired. It's the opposite. Shokin stalled the investigation into Burisma that his predecessor started. He also stalled dozens of other investigations. One of those investigations what about what happened to billions of dollars the IMF and World Bank loaned Ukraine...hence why the global community supported the firing of Shokin and why Joe Biden was tasked with working with Ukraine to remove him. Shokin was protecting his corrupt friends from prosecution. This is all well documented and has been known for years."

I even recall directly replying to you about it but those threads are closed now.

And by the way.....what happened after Vicktor Shokin was fired?  A new prosecutor as brought in and completed the investigation into Burisma.  Also, didn't you know the investigation into Burisma began BEFORE Hunter joined the board?  So how could Shokin have been investigating Hunter Biden if he wasn't even there yet?

Also...did you know that Hunter stepped down from the board of Burisma in April 2019 once his father Joe Biden announced his presidential candidacy so as not to create conflict of interest?

Finally, Shokin's replacement (Lutsenko) and his replacement (Riaboshapka) have both stated that they have not seen any evidence of wrong doing by Hunter or Joe Biden.

All of this is easily accessible public record.  But you and the Republicans want an investigation for answers that have already been answered for years.

The Senate Democrats voted 100% for the witnesses....including Biden.

1). The opposing arguments were limited to unfounded allegations about information already available. It wasn't just me.  I just provided my quotes.  It ended when you and others decided that the truth was irrelevant.

2). Technically, the investigation as into Mykola Zlochevsky: Burisma's founder.  It was never an investigation into Burisma itself.  That's just a lot easier for people to type out than the founder's name. The investigations learned that he violated tax laws.  He paid $7.44 million in fines.  I'd like to know how you think those are related to Hunter Biden joining the board AFTER all that.

3). The investigations started before he got there.  It came to light before eh got there.  What part of that are you not getting?

4). What does Mueller have to do with the 2 Ukrainian Prosecutor Generals? And again, what does Mykola Zlochevsky's tax issues have to with a board member of his company before he joined it?

Who are you getting your information from?  Why are you not researching this yourself?

The Democrats weren't delaying the vote for witnesses.  That vote date was set up before hand.  And they always said they would vote YES on the amendment.  Their disinterest of having Biden testify was irrelevant to them saying they would vote to have witnesses.  In fact, 2 Republicans joined the Democrats to have witnesses. 

I know what they say he did wrong. Excuse me for finding it beyond hard to believe that a well known person like Giuliana, a lawyer, who's in the public eye and a giant target for the Dems and MSM, went and did something clearly illegal, and brags about it on national TV.

Usually suicidal people don't go around, especially on social media, bragging that they're going to off themselves or go kamikaze.

Not the best comparison,suicidal people do what they do because they feel powerless and see no other way out so those that are seriously considering it have nothing to brag about.

Kamikaze is rare and if it happens it is often forced.

Conversely powerful people don't feel like the rules apply to them.  

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iTACH1eVIaA

If someone thinks they are above the law, why couldn't they brag about it?

You can't assume someone's innocence because they are idiotic, and you can't assume someone is innocent because their actions would be considered unthinkable.

Racists - The gift that keeps on giving.

1). What does Trump's golf dates have to do with this?

2). Yous should really re-read what you just wrote.  If the media you read/watch isn't showing you what the Democrats are saying, then you are intentionally being lied to. 

3). First, I hope you meant Republicans, not Senate. And no, the Republicans had an interest in witnesses too.  But they were irrelevant to the case.  They wanted to call Joe Biden, Hunter Biden, Obama and a few others.  Essentially they wanted to flip the impeachment trial of Trump into a criminal trial of the Biden's.  That's not how it works.  If you have a case against the Bidens, then file that case.  Make it happen.  If all that stuff happened, where is that case?  Why isn't the DoJ and State Department investigating? 

4). Wow.  Nice conspiracy theory. You mean to tell me all Senate Republicans got together and decided that a couple of R's need to vote for witnesses to give the impression of impartiality?  What did Mitch McConnell offer the turncoats?  A cushy committee chair appointment?   A whip position?  RE-election campaign support?  You seem to know.