EricHiggin said:
If a bunch of other people or countries agree doing bad things is ok, then no point in arguing, just go along with it? Could other countries be forced to agree due to leverage from a superpower?
There's no proof, since the original prosecutor was ousted due to leverage, used by none other than Biden, only to be replaced by someone that Biden feels is right for the job? Man it's nice when things fall into place like that. Thank God for fate I guess?
|
Why is it wrong to oust an incredibly corrupt prosecutor who is internationally acknowledged as being incredibly corrupt? What is wrong about that? If your argument is that Biden's actions were wrong because the prosecutor was a great 10/10 guy who did nothing wrong, you would be disagreeing with basically the entire world and I think you will have to do at least a little bit to actually convince anyone of that point. However, even if you were able to prove the entire international community wrong, this man who you think was working tirelessly to bring down Hunter Biden....wasn't. Again, he was actually standing in the way of international investigations, preventing the company Hunter Biden was involved with from being investigated, and just recently, this prosecutor stated that he is not aware of any possible violation of Ukrainian law by Joe or Hunter Biden.
There is nothing wrong with the United States using its economic leverage to impact foreign governments. That is the entire purpose of sanctions (and foreign policy in general). The problem comes when instead of acting in the interests of the county, you begin to act in the interest of yourself. Asking for a hit job on a political opponent is extremely corrupt. Asking for a government to remove a corrupt prosecutor is not.
Your entire argument is based on a flawed rationality, to the very core. There is nothing there.