Bullshit.

Sorry, but that comparison is just awful. Of course people should be allowed to sit where they want on public transportation, but not just anyone gets to speak in front of an audience. If I went up to a University and told them that I would like to speak about whatever came to my mind for one hour in an official event in their Auditorium, they would tell me to fuck off, because there is no expectation of universal access there. No one should expect to be given a platform such as this just because they aren't hurting anyone. That isn't how any of this works and making that comparison is patently ridiculous.

The provision of a platform is expression in and of itself, and in order to maintain freedom of expression, we must allow Universities to make these decisions themselves. Mandating equality of expression is a violation of rights, not a protection of rights.

As free speech already existed on college campuses, the Executive Order doesn't change anything.

Perhaps it's just to be used as an excuse for arbitrarily de-funding colleges. It wouldn't be the first time Beloved Leader's regime explored options to decrease college attendance. To Beloved Leader's collaborators, logic is an enemy and truth is a menace.

Why do you always attack people who don't hold the same views as you?

Private universities that receive government money are able to set their own policy on what people are or are not allowed to say. This bill mostly affects private universities since free speech is already a thing in public onez.

Free speech is already a thing in private onez.

No one, just like all of the conservatives and anti PC crowd that constantly complain about being censored aren't actually being put in jail or silenced. People really need to learn that people not liking your opinion isn't the same as denying someone of their 1st anendmame rights. Even going as far to push for an organization or company to drop their support or deny a person access to their privately owned platform isn't a denial of 1st amendment rights. 

Your saying there was never a time where people of color were only aloud to sit at the back of the bus, yet were still aloud to ride the bus? The reason being at that point in time segregation was seen as normal. They had to fight for the right to sit where they wanted.

There is an overwhelming amount of schools that heavily favor lefty viewpoints and speakers, yet they allow centrists and conservatives to attend the school and it's events. The reason being that catering to the left and ignoring the center and right has become the norm. They have been fighting for their right to speak freely and have speakers who hold their same viewpoints.

I don't see how they aren't similar. Both are groups who are/were oppressed in an unreasonable manner and who fought for their right to be treated equally.

No one on the left disagrees with free speech, it is one of our core principles. It always favours the progressive elements of society against the reactionary conservative elements.

I would have taken it a step further and mandated that ALL institutions, private and public, require freedom of speech in order to be accredited as an educational institution.

First off, I'm comparing the specific bus situation to the specific school free speech situation. If you want to try and compare every racial issue from that time to the specific free speech issue on campus right now, that wouldn't make any sense, because obviously the entirety of racial issue's back then was a much bigger problem.

Secondly, your point about being black. Are you seriously suggesting that every single centrist and conservative student fighting for free speech is white?