As AngryLittleAlchemist stated, Razorfist is back, and this time he's not alone. He's got Taj and Brandi Jackson (Michael's nephew and niece) in tow. Where they continue making waves and giving their two cents on the documentary and address the renewed allegations. Including Brandi talking about how she and Wade Robson had been in a relationship for at least 7 years and that it was actually Michael himself who paired them together, many of the various timetable discrepancies with Robson and Safechuck's stories, response to the reception of the documentary and the differences between America and Europe's reception, their own personal stories of their Uncle Michael, etc.

Furthermore, Taj Jackson is fundraising his own documentary series that will serve as a direct counter to Leaving Neverland, as well as, the 1993 allegations, the 1994 settlement, and the 2005 trial. The whole 9 yards. His goal is to raise $777k for the project and he is currently at around $108k and for those of you questioning why he is doing a fundraiser when he could easily get funding elsewhere, he explains his reasoning for doing so in the description. It is completely independent and separate from the Michael Jackson Estate. It is a project he is doing on his own accord and out of the necessity, principal, and drive of a nephew to defend the name, legacy, and innocence of his passed uncle.

https://www.gofundme.com/f/untitled-michael-jackson-documentary-series

"Lies run sprints, but the truth runs marathons." - Michael Jackson

https://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/entertainment/celebrity/leaving-neverland-director-makes-embarrassing-14221624

I don't know if MJ did or didn't do whatever he's accused of. At first I was pretty convinced. Since then I've watched hours of footage, interviews, concerts, etc and at this point, I just don't care about the controversy anymore. I'm a blind fan. If there's something concrete, I'll jump back on board the train but for now, I will accept MJ as the jellybean we thought he was.

That jellybean thing is from Rick and Morty, btw.

Here is a actual credible article about what they found in MJ's house it also shows how some sites manipulated what was found to make it seem worse then what it was:

https://www.huffpost.com/entry/no-child-porn-found-at-neverland-thenor-now-the_b_577fdfbce4b0f06648f4a3f8

Seems like the tide is turning a bit and people are realizing what a fake the documentary was.

Uh ohhhhh, spaghettiooooos!

https://www.nme.com/news/music/michael-jackson-biographer-exposes-wade-robson-james-safechucks-allegations-false-leaving-neverland-2469413

Dan Reed is just digging his career's own grave at this point.

Admitted what?? Safechuck was at Neverland after the train station was completed. He even took photos of the station, we put two of these in the film. And he’s clear in the documentary that the sexual contact with Jackson continued into his teens...

— Dan Reed (@danreed1000) April 2, 2019

He can't defend himself anymore.
Anyhow, I'm more willing to believe he was innocent, he gave me the impression he was just desperately trying, although with quirky and kitsch tastes, to live again the childhood his horrible, greedy father stole from him and his brothers, not trying to abuse other kids' one. A tormented soul, but not an evil one.

Furthermore, he just wanted to give kids that joyful experience and childhood that he never got to experience. So, it was both selfish and selfless at the same time. True, his methods and how he presented himself raised many eyebrows, as to be expected, but his intentions were always pure.

Forgot this thread existed but the documentary was aired yesterday in Finland for the first time on a show called Docventures. Didn't watch it yet though. They had a discussion afterwards and instead going back and forth whether Jackson is innocent or not, the documentary served as an introduction to discussion about sexual abuse towards children. The discussion helped many people seek help and talk about their experiences already.

I'd just like to point out that it's not out of ordinary that victims don't even realize they've been abused until they're grown up and/or something triggers their memories. They know something about them is broken but they don't know what it is, the brain blocks such traumatic events from their memory. Futhermore, it's unreasonable to expect victims to remember timelines or even locations clearly. Just think about some even from your childhood and try to remember an exact year it happened. Memories are quite unreliable. So all this "It couldn't have happened in 1993 everything is debunked and they're lying!!!!" is pretty disturbing stuff and will not do any good for others who are still silent about their suffering.

These people who now speak were children back then. Allegedly abused by someone close to them who they trusted. Someone who has millions of fans ready to defend him and shame the victim. Can you really blame them for inconsistencies in their statements?

Finding solid proof in cases like this is also very tricky as time has passed. More often than not it's words against words.