Quantcast
"Leaving Neverland": Do you think Michael Jackson is Innocent?

Forums - General Discussion - "Leaving Neverland": Do you think Michael Jackson is Innocent?

Thriller and Invincible or Bad and Dangerous

Good guy, wrongly accused 48 52.17%
 
Talented Bad guy 23 25.00%
 
A little of both. 21 22.83%
 
Total:92

Well even though this clip is pretty old its somewhat on point and very funny.



Around the Network

People still think Wade Robson's intentions are pure? He's a habitual liar and seeking to profit off a dead man.

http://dailymichael.com/lawsuits/robson-v-estate/338-busted-wade-robson-got-caught-hiding-evidence-and-shopping-a-tell-all-book



I think at this point I prefer to not give an opinion.
I let people debating about it.

Although I would argue a few things that nobody is saying/hear :
-if those guys are lying, they are the best actors I ever saw
-During a Joe Rogan podcast with Ben Anderson (a legitimate war reporter suffering of PTSD), Anderson said he met one of the two alleged victims, and that he believes him and that his opinion is that the guy suffers from PTSD. After listening to him for 3 hours, I would say that the guy knows what his talking about, that he is not the kind of guy you can fooled, and that he seems like genuine, honest guy.
-that interview of Michael Jackson where he is with a kid and talks about sleeping in the same bed as kids freaked me f*ck out enough to know that the guy really was crazy.



I don't care if his ghost voted for Donald J Trump. He will always be the king of pop and nothing is ever going to change that.



maxleresistant said:
I think at this point I prefer to not give an opinion.
I let people debating about it.

Although I would argue a few things that nobody is saying/hear :
-if those guys are lying, they are the best actors I ever saw

What do you mean? They both together cried like a total of two times between them... in the span of 240 minutes. While very clearly trying to show extreme emotion throughout the film. Many times it looked like they were straining their faces trying elicit a reaction or tear. I'm not saying their lying, but I am saying that if they were acting, it wasn't particularly good. They just talked really slow with sad music playing in the background, that's it. 



Around the Network
AngryLittleAlchemist said:
maxleresistant said:
I think at this point I prefer to not give an opinion.
I let people debating about it.

Although I would argue a few things that nobody is saying/hear :
-if those guys are lying, they are the best actors I ever saw

What do you mean? They both together cried like a total of two times between them... in the span of 240 minutes. While very clearly trying to show extreme emotion throughout the film. Many times it looked like they were straining their faces trying elicit a reaction or tear. I'm not saying their lying, but I am saying that if they were acting, it wasn't particularly good. They just talked really slow with sad music playing in the background, that's it. 

Well all the supporting evidence points towards them lying plus most the timeline doesn't match up with the real timeline.  Not to mention they had to cut over 40 minutes of this so called documentary overseas since those segments had obvious lies and false statements.



maxleresistant said:
I think at this point I prefer to not give an opinion.
I let people debating about it.

Although I would argue a few things that nobody is saying/hear :
-if those guys are lying, they are the best actors I ever saw
-During a Joe Rogan podcast with Ben Anderson (a legitimate war reporter suffering of PTSD), Anderson said he met one of the two alleged victims, and that he believes him and that his opinion is that the guy suffers from PTSD. After listening to him for 3 hours, I would say that the guy knows what his talking about, that he is not the kind of guy you can fooled, and that he seems like genuine, honest guy.
-that interview of Michael Jackson where he is with a kid and talks about sleeping in the same bed as kids freaked me f*ck out enough to know that the guy really was crazy.

But bro, he wrote Thriller. Plus some random MJ fansite posted some nasty stuff about the pedophile victims. I refuse to believe this adult man who slept with, drugged, dressed up, and fake married ever actually did anything sexual with them. All the nude images of children found in his house were artsy in nature so that makes them ok. Plus he never had a real childhood! That explains everything I said above.



LudicrousSpeed said:
maxleresistant said:
I think at this point I prefer to not give an opinion.
I let people debating about it.

Although I would argue a few things that nobody is saying/hear :
-if those guys are lying, they are the best actors I ever saw
-During a Joe Rogan podcast with Ben Anderson (a legitimate war reporter suffering of PTSD), Anderson said he met one of the two alleged victims, and that he believes him and that his opinion is that the guy suffers from PTSD. After listening to him for 3 hours, I would say that the guy knows what his talking about, that he is not the kind of guy you can fooled, and that he seems like genuine, honest guy.
-that interview of Michael Jackson where he is with a kid and talks about sleeping in the same bed as kids freaked me f*ck out enough to know that the guy really was crazy.

But bro, he wrote Thriller. Plus some random MJ fansite posted some nasty stuff about the pedophile victims. I refuse to believe this adult man who slept with, drugged, dressed up, and fake married ever actually did anything sexual with them. All the nude images of children found in his house were artsy in nature so that makes them ok. Plus he never had a real childhood! That explains everything I said above.

You need to do some more research they actually never found any nude images of children in his house the only thing they found is a tabletop book with semi nude boys in it and that book was a best seller so many people actually own that same book. 



Chris Hu said:
LudicrousSpeed said:

But bro, he wrote Thriller. Plus some random MJ fansite posted some nasty stuff about the pedophile victims. I refuse to believe this adult man who slept with, drugged, dressed up, and fake married ever actually did anything sexual with them. All the nude images of children found in his house were artsy in nature so that makes them ok. Plus he never had a real childhood! That explains everything I said above.

You need to do some more research they actually never found any nude images of children in his house the only thing they found is a tabletop book with semi nude boys in it and that book was a best seller so many people actually own that same book. 

lol they found photos of nude and partially clothed kids in sexually suggestive poses and even photos of nude/partially clothed adults in sexual poses but kids faces were put on the adult bodies. Stuff that is fucking creepy but at the time wasn’t classified as actual child pornography. 

Not going to post in here any more, MJ apologists are never going to listen to logic or reason.



LudicrousSpeed said:
Chris Hu said:

You need to do some more research they actually never found any nude images of children in his house the only thing they found is a tabletop book with semi nude boys in it and that book was a best seller so many people actually own that same book. 

lol they found photos of nude and partially clothed kids in sexually suggestive poses and even photos of nude/partially clothed adults in sexual poses but kids faces were put on the adult bodies. Stuff that is fucking creepy but at the time wasn’t classified as actual child pornography.

Any specifics? Genuinely curious.