Quantcast
Another JRPG Canceled on Xbox One, RPG Maker MV

Forums - Gaming Discussion - Another JRPG Canceled on Xbox One, RPG Maker MV

Tagged games:

hunter_alien said:
LudicrousSpeed said:
I’d nope the fuck out just at the box art alone.

Of course you would...

OT: not surprised. The interest in the system pretty much collapsed in a year from both consumers and developers, and I doubt a niche Japanese title would find success on it.

Consumer interest in the system has been relatively stable and it gets huge support.

The only thing I agree is a niche Japanese developer didn't see their product succeeding on Xbox. Either way, I think classic FF games finally coming to Xbox compensates for this.



Recently Completed
Crackdown 3
for X1S/X1X (4/5) - Infinity Blade III - for iPad 4 (3/5) - Infinity Blade II - for iPad 4 (4/5) - Infinity Blade - for iPad 4 (4/5) - Wolfenstein: The Old Blood for X1 (3/5) - Assassin's Creed: Origins for X1 (3/5) - Uncharted: Lost Legacy for PS4 (4/5) - EA UFC 3 for X1 (4/5) - Doom for X1 (4/5) - Titanfall 2 for X1 (4/5) - Super Mario 3D World for Wii U (4/5) - South Park: The Stick of Truth for X1 BC (4/5) - Call of Duty: WWII for X1 (4/5) -Wolfenstein II for X1 - (4/5) - Dead or Alive: Dimensions for 3DS (4/5) - Marvel vs Capcom: Infinite for X1 (3/5) - Halo Wars 2 for X1/PC (4/5) - Halo Wars: DE for X1 (4/5) - Tekken 7 for X1 (4/5) - Injustice 2 for X1 (4/5) - Yakuza 5 for PS3 (3/5) - Battlefield 1 (Campaign) for X1 (3/5) - Assassin's Creed: Syndicate for X1 (4/5) - Call of Duty: Infinite Warfare for X1 (4/5) - Call of Duty: MW Remastered for X1 (4/5) - Donkey Kong Country Returns for 3DS (4/5) - Forza Horizon 3 for X1 (5/5)

Around the Network
HoangNhatAnh said:
Pinkie_pie said:

if switch gets persona 5 so will xbox. its much easier to port it to xbox so why not.

By that logic, Xbox would have Shin Megami Tensei IV, IV A and V too

Yes if ps4 gets them xbox will too



Pinkie_pie said:
HoangNhatAnh said:

By that logic, Xbox would have Shin Megami Tensei IV, IV A and V too

Yes if ps4 gets them xbox will too

I have to agree with HoangNhatAnh here. That's not safe logic there. PS4 has plenty of games that hasn't come to Xbox. Hell Xbox has never had a mainline Persona game. Well I don't think Nintendo has either now that I'm typing this. For some reason it just seems as though the Persona series will thrive on Nintendo just as much as PlayStation. I'm just not sure if the audience is there on Xbox. Who knows at this point though. You could very well be right and it may hit the Xbox One.



PSN ID- Rafie27

XBL Gamertag- RAFIE82

NNID- RAFIE82/ Friend Code: SW-6006-2580-8237

YouTube- Rafie Crocheron

Mr Puggsly said:
hunter_alien said:

Of course you would...

OT: not surprised. The interest in the system pretty much collapsed in a year from both consumers and developers, and I doubt a niche Japanese title would find success on it.

Consumer interest in the system has been relatively stable and it gets huge support.

The only thing I agree is a niche Japanese developer didn't see their product succeeding on Xbox. Either way, I think classic FF games finally coming to Xbox compensates for this.

The system is nonexistent on Asian markets, it disappeared in Europe and based on current NPD numbers its kicking the bucket in the US as well. Yeah, the system is going on the way of the dodo fast. I really don't know how else to call it.



Shocked to hear dev port for Xbone has collapsed. Here I was thinking it was still getting all the important games.



Around the Network
Mar1217 said:
DonFerrari said:

Officially yes, but I'm pretty sure Sony have/will put money on it as well. The amount raised in Kickstarter doesn't seem like what would be needed if they were to go their full vision. But well even if Sony doesn't put a cent on it the advertisement itself is worth quite some money (well Sony also benefitted a lot from it).

And there is almost no full exclusive anyway besides the ones made by 1st party. And on that it is quite curious that on VGC every time some doesn't put a game on Nintendo platform we got a lot of complains but when they put only on Nintendo even without moneyhat we don't see as much complain (and probably would get quite some defenses on why it makes sense).

Are you willingly forgetting the discussions over SMT V Switch exclusivity ? Cuz I remember some lengthy discussions about that one.

Nope. If there were a thread I either didn't participate or don't remember it. Still, would you agree that we get more attacks on games not going to Switch than to other systems? Same as we get more defense for game going only to Switch and not on others?

And that basically because userbase of Nintendo is a little bigger and also PS fanbase already receive a lot of games so less care given to the few games that don't go there without any attacks to the devs being dumb or hating the platform?

You could have used the case of Bayonetta, that is one that usually had complains from selected users from Xbox and PS.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Pinkie_pie said:
HoangNhatAnh said:

By that logic, Xbox would have Shin Megami Tensei IV, IV A and V too

Yes if ps4 gets them xbox will too

Then where are Persona Q and Persona Q 2 on both ps4/xbox 1?



DonFerrari said:
Mar1217 said:

Are you willingly forgetting the discussions over SMT V Switch exclusivity ? Cuz I remember some lengthy discussions about that one.

Nope. If there were a thread I either didn't participate or don't remember it. Still, would you agree that we get more attacks on games not going to Switch than to other systems? Same as we get more defense for game going only to Switch and not on others?

And that basically because userbase of Nintendo is a little bigger and also PS fanbase already receive a lot of games so less care given to the few games that don't go there without any attacks to the devs being dumb or hating the platform?

You could have used the case of Bayonetta, that is one that usually had complains from selected users from Xbox and PS.

That was during the WiiU era. There wasn't much people to whine about the fact not much 3rd party games were coming to the console (and even less on the exclusivity front),specially since the WiiU never ended up as a success thus justifying it's non-support from them.

Switch is a complete turnover though, which completly justifies why it gets stuff of it's own like the PS4 did throughout it's lifetime. Simple as that, there's no matter of getting defensive here.



Switch Friend Code : 3905-6122-2909 

Mar1217 said:
DonFerrari said:

Nope. If there were a thread I either didn't participate or don't remember it. Still, would you agree that we get more attacks on games not going to Switch than to other systems? Same as we get more defense for game going only to Switch and not on others?

And that basically because userbase of Nintendo is a little bigger and also PS fanbase already receive a lot of games so less care given to the few games that don't go there without any attacks to the devs being dumb or hating the platform?

You could have used the case of Bayonetta, that is one that usually had complains from selected users from Xbox and PS.

That was during the WiiU era. There wasn't much people to whine about the fact not much 3rd party games were coming to the console (and even less on the exclusivity front),specially since the WiiU never ended up as a success thus justifying it's non-support from them.

Switch is a complete turnover though, which completly justifies why it gets stuff of it's own like the PS4 did throughout it's lifetime. Simple as that, there's no matter of getting defensive here.

I have no issue with games going exclusive to Switch, some perhaps doesn't make sense to skip PS4 imho, but I understand that devs and pubs are making the decision they think will bring most profit. They don't avoid a system just for giggles.

And believe or not there were plenty of people that complained that the 3rd bayonetta wasn't multiplat, go figures kkkkk.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

DonFerrari said:
Mar1217 said:

That was during the WiiU era. There wasn't much people to whine about the fact not much 3rd party games were coming to the console (and even less on the exclusivity front),specially since the WiiU never ended up as a success thus justifying it's non-support from them.

Switch is a complete turnover though, which completly justifies why it gets stuff of it's own like the PS4 did throughout it's lifetime. Simple as that, there's no matter of getting defensive here.

I have no issue with games going exclusive to Switch, some perhaps doesn't make sense to skip PS4 imho, but I understand that devs and pubs are making the decision they think will bring most profit. They don't avoid a system just for giggles.

And believe or not there were plenty of people that complained that the 3rd bayonetta wasn't multiplat, go figures kkkkk.

It'll come from all places everytime so that's just the usual at this point,lol. (Same for the crowd on Switch wanting Persona 5, it might never come even with Joker in Smash)



Switch Friend Code : 3905-6122-2909