By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming Discussion - DF : Anthem Tested on all consoles

kirby007 on 06 February 2019
vivster said:
kirby007 said:
Cherrypicking much.. a lower res has a higher fps

Performance = fps and nothing else. If there was a 480p version that runs at 120fps then that would be the best performance. Not sure how you're conflating resolution with performance.

Because a bigger res is also a bigger performance

Performance isnt only fps



 "I think people should define the word crap" - Kirby007

Join the Prediction League http://www.vgchartz.com/predictions

Instead of seeking to convince others, we can be open to changing our own minds, and seek out information that contradicts our own steadfast point of view. Maybe it’ll turn out that those who disagree with you actually have a solid grasp of the facts. There’s a slight possibility that, after all, you’re the one who’s wrong.

Around the Network
flashfire926 on 06 February 2019

Its sorta sad the Pro cant achieve 1080p 60fps. What's even more worse is the lack of a performance mode on X.

Xbox One OG is on its last legs.



Bet with Intrinsic:

The Switch will outsell 3DS (based on VGchartz numbers), according to me, while Intrinsic thinks the opposite will hold true. One month avatar control for the loser's avatar.

haxxiy on 06 February 2019
kirby007 said:
vivster said:

Performance = fps and nothing else. If there was a 480p version that runs at 120fps then that would be the best performance. Not sure how you're conflating resolution with performance.

Because a bigger res is also a bigger performance

Performance isnt only fps

I don't think this word means what you think it does.

Xbox use "performance" to mean the mode opposite to "graphics", for instance.

Also in Windows and smartphones, meaning the mode things runs faster, though consuming more battery.



 

 

 

 

 

kirby007 on 06 February 2019
haxxiy said:
kirby007 said:

Because a bigger res is also a bigger performance

Performance isnt only fps

I don't think this word means what you think it does.

Xbox use "performance" to mean the mode opposite to "graphics", for instance.

Also in Windows and smartphones, meaning the mode things runs faster, though consuming more battery.

I very well do and limiting performance only to the aspect of FPS is nonsense.

For example FHD to WQHD is also increasing performance



 "I think people should define the word crap" - Kirby007

Join the Prediction League http://www.vgchartz.com/predictions

Instead of seeking to convince others, we can be open to changing our own minds, and seek out information that contradicts our own steadfast point of view. Maybe it’ll turn out that those who disagree with you actually have a solid grasp of the facts. There’s a slight possibility that, after all, you’re the one who’s wrong.

Ganoncrotch on 06 February 2019

I gotta say, seeing this thing chugging down close to 20fps on some of those systems at 900p that was fairly terrible in terms of what you expect from a full HD home console, sure the Switch has Doom and Wolfenstein 2 which drop down to 720 and lower with frame rates around that... but that is on a system which can be picked up and stuck in your pocket for on the go play. They covered "all consoles" too... but they consider the S to be the base model of the X1, it isn't and there is a performance difference between the S and the original VHS X1, I would love to see the low end of fps on that system.

https://www.theverge.com/2016/8/2/12352184/microsoft-xbox-one-s-performance-improvements
S is 7.1% faster with "boosts frame rates by up to 9fps in some other games," so yeah.... given that the S is reaching lows of 20fps, knock 7% off that and you're down to 17-18fps, really would be reaching difficult to play at that stage.



Why not check me out on youtube and help me on the way to 2k subs over at www.youtube.com/stormcloudlive

Around the Network
Pemalite on 06 February 2019
vivster said:

Performance = fps and nothing else. If there was a 480p version that runs at 120fps then that would be the best performance. Not sure how you're conflating resolution with performance.

Not true! Performance isn't just fps. - You can have a high fps, but poor frame pacing which results in an experience that would be inferior to a more stable, but lower framerate.


flashfire926 said:
Xbox One OG is on its last legs.

Yeah. It's certainly the console that hasn't aged well.

But I think 900P + 20-25fps is still a good showing for it, but dropping it down to 720P+frame reconsctruction and boosting anti-aliasing a little would have been a good compromise.

kirby007 said:

For example FHD to WQHD is also increasing performance

No. You are increasing resolution at the expense of performance.
The higher in resolution you go, generally the larger your render times become.



--::{PC Gaming Master Race}::--

kirby007 on 06 February 2019
CGI-Quality said:
As a guy who works with a job in Image and Design, I can tell you that resolution is NOT a form of performance.

A tree displayed in 1440p with exact the same fps settings isnt a better performance then 720p. 

 

Riggggght



 "I think people should define the word crap" - Kirby007

Join the Prediction League http://www.vgchartz.com/predictions

Instead of seeking to convince others, we can be open to changing our own minds, and seek out information that contradicts our own steadfast point of view. Maybe it’ll turn out that those who disagree with you actually have a solid grasp of the facts. There’s a slight possibility that, after all, you’re the one who’s wrong.

kirby007 on 06 February 2019
CGI-Quality said:
kirby007 said:

A tree displayed in 1440p with exact the same fps settings isnt a better performance then 720p. 

 

Riggggght

 Resolution can impact performance, but it is not a form of it. A still image in 720p and 1440p is performing the same thing: still. Once it is in motion, the motion becomes the performance.

So, no, 1440p and 720p are not forms of performance. They are two different sizes of output.

Get me like this then if a switch version of anthem that would run at 240p and does 60fps would perform best according to OP



 "I think people should define the word crap" - Kirby007

Join the Prediction League http://www.vgchartz.com/predictions

Instead of seeking to convince others, we can be open to changing our own minds, and seek out information that contradicts our own steadfast point of view. Maybe it’ll turn out that those who disagree with you actually have a solid grasp of the facts. There’s a slight possibility that, after all, you’re the one who’s wrong.

kirby007 on 06 February 2019

So you agree that the switch version has the highest performance due to outputting lower res but higher fps



 "I think people should define the word crap" - Kirby007

Join the Prediction League http://www.vgchartz.com/predictions

Instead of seeking to convince others, we can be open to changing our own minds, and seek out information that contradicts our own steadfast point of view. Maybe it’ll turn out that those who disagree with you actually have a solid grasp of the facts. There’s a slight possibility that, after all, you’re the one who’s wrong.

kirby007 on 06 February 2019
CGI-Quality said:
kirby007 said:
So you agree that the switch version has the highest performance due to outputting lower res but higher fps

Highest performance due to a lower res does not confirm that the res is the performance. It merely states that performance is better as a result of a lower res (again, image, not performance).

Then explain me that list in the OP



 "I think people should define the word crap" - Kirby007

Join the Prediction League http://www.vgchartz.com/predictions

Instead of seeking to convince others, we can be open to changing our own minds, and seek out information that contradicts our own steadfast point of view. Maybe it’ll turn out that those who disagree with you actually have a solid grasp of the facts. There’s a slight possibility that, after all, you’re the one who’s wrong.