GOWTLOZ said:
Supporting devs for their business practices isn't really fun. Amazing is subjective but a game with a more positive consensus is more likely to be it. If you already have various clients, why not another one. Metro looks like a once in a gen game, probably the first game of this style since Metro Last Light but with some cool new features. It looks like the Arkham City, pun intended to its predecessor. |
Supporting devs that actually make good games I enjoy, games that aren't riddled with MT's and locked to a storefront that is utter garbage for the user is more fun.
And yet there are 7+ billion people on this planet, with not everyone thinking what you think in terms of "greatness". See, just because a percentage of one populous thinking one thing is great, does not make it a "fact", or "objective" greatness, no, because then you have to ask and account for everyone else, and who on earth is going to waste their entire lives to ask all 7+ billion people?. Would you just easily assume everyone likes what you like, in order to make appear as if it were objective?.
Because I don't want to use more clients than the ones I already use?. Why can't THQ just sell the game on the storefronts I already use?. Why can't they sell their game on GoG?, oh that's right, because it uses DRM, I almost forgot about that anti-consumer part...
It looks "once in a gen" to you, but not to me, which in turn doesn't make it objectively a "once in a gen game", it's your opinion and I'll keep pointing this out, until you lot say "imo", because that's what it is.
Step right up come on in, feel the buzz in your veins, I'm like an chemical electrical right into your brain and I'm the one who killed the Radio, soon you'll all see
So pay up motherfuckers you belong to "V"