Pemalite said:
EricHiggin said:
I could be mistaken, but I'm pretty sure the documentary I watched on the LHC quite a few years back, had a few highly regarded individuals who were part of it, mention while the intention/hope was to find/prove the Higgs boson, there was no guarantee. Obviously there was some level faith there, even after all the math and science, not to mention the money and man hours it took to build it.
|
The difference there was that the math provided the necessary evidence to showcase it's "possible" existence... Math doesn't do the same for justifying the existence of any deity.
They did eventually prove the Higgs Boson to exist during testing in 2012.
EricHiggin said:
Otherwise, why build it? Now it did eventually succeed, after years of tinkering, changes, additions, etc, which certainly weren't as "good" as instantly being successful, so was that bad? Does math and science always go to plan, and does it always succeed, flawlessly?
|
Of course not. But if the science proved the Higgs Boson didn't exist, then scientists wouldn't have denied the results and continued to assert that it existed.
Does science and math always go to plan? No. No they do not. And Math and Science will change it's stance on something as the evidence proves/disproves something, it's not rigid.
That is the difference between science and faith-based religious concepts.
EricHiggin said:
A question that has to be asked, is were those incidents you witnessed God's will/fault, since they are the one and only creator so it's written? Did God give people free will? Is that why the Devil get's to mess with things as well? Is life without hardship whatsoever better/sustainable? Could science prove that?
|
If God is all-powerful, then he is all-knowing and he is able to put a stop to such horrors... And can make a hypothetical devil disappear in a flash, the fact he doesn't means his empathy can come into question.
For example, if I was to have a Road Crash occur at the front of my home, I am NOT going to stand-by and do nothing, I will be jumping in to lend a hand, because watching people suffer isn't a good thing, it's not good, it's not loving, it's not empathy.
Me jumping in to save someones life isn't removing that other persons free will, it's as simple as that.
EricHiggin said:
Let's just assume you have a strong point, and assume God does exist, and that most of what is written about them is true for the most part. Based on that, what about everything good that God has done aside from the negatives? If God is not worth worshiping, then is anything or anyone worth worshiping? Where exactly is the point when people cross the line into specifically worshiping something? How does that apply to the world today? If there are people worshiping stuff, should we make it illegal?
|
What good? A quick read of the Bible which is full of torture, abuse, discrimination, death, war, hate and bigotry proves that the God of the Abrahamic religions is far from being good, kind, loving or fair.
And correct. No one is worth worshiping... Our prime minister for example fucked off during a national crisis while our country was burning... And he only sent "thoughts and prayers". - People died. That is the danger of religion and it's ability to numb peoples responses.
Should worshiping be made illegal? No. I fully support the Australian constitution and it's intrinsic rights to freedom of religion... But also the implied right of freedom from religion... And of course support my right to criticize other peoples belief systems.
Australia is far less religious than the USA thankfully and we are becoming more secular as time goes on.
|
Possible. Based on techniques used, created by human minds, to fulfill a need. Something was there, and they made a highly educated guess, and with a little faith, or whatever word you want to use, they moved forward and luckily were successful eventually. Has religion made any progress?
I mentioned this below in the next point you singled out. Not sure if you missed it or not. Hopefully it wasn't in bad, faith. ;)
---
I agree about being more flexible in general. Religion doesn't seem to allow for that as much. Depends on the religion, people, and time. Religion isn't near as violent as it once was, but doesn't seem as efficient as science in it's quest for truth. Less efficient doesn't mean bad or wrong though. Also, some are getting the wrong impression about science as well, that it's in a way, 'all knowing' and 'unquestionable', which needs to be addressed before it causes trouble like it has for religion.
---
God created what they created though, and now we're here. Why they created things the way they did would be great to know, and would probably help answer many questions, but the fact is the universe operates as it does, and 'bad' things happen because of that. I'm not saying there aren't bad things that happen, but what bad means also isn't exactly scientific. Time itself changes what falls into the good or bad categories. Is God allowed to change the rules on the fly? How would that change the universe and it's laws? Is that why the double slit experiment makes no sense?
I get your point, but what if that person in the one car, has had a life you wouldn't ever wish upon yourself let alone anyone, and is suicidal? What if they crashed their car on purpose? That's quite unlikely, but you can't know for sure what they, or the other person were thinking, and what they want. You may have gotten in the way of their choice, but that's the problem with free will. It doesn't always allow things to work out as someone may have chosen. Did you do the right thing by saving them? God apparently would think you did.
---
God created everything, in just 6 days. That itself I think would be hard to argue against, is an unmatchable achievement, if it's all true. Your P.M. did really screw the pooch there. They are human, and much worse, a politician, so it's tough to be surprised though right? I like freedom too, as long as your freedom stays clear of my lawn.