JRPGfan said:
probably alot of legal work done first but yeah.. |
lol, seems Activision wasn't too focused on keeping its hands on Destiny.
JRPGfan said:
probably alot of legal work done first but yeah.. |
lol, seems Activision wasn't too focused on keeping its hands on Destiny.
Nintendo has money and needs a stable Metroid developer, Microsoft is in a shopping-spree and Sony might want a new FPS exclusive. Let the race begin.
It's easy to blame Activision for the bad reception TWO, not one, Bungie games have received. It's not like their union was forced upon Bungie.
I want to know just how big Destiny of an IP is at the moment, with the game being given for free just months ago and the rise of Fortnite-like games, it doesn't look like the IP is standing on solid grounds.
Luke888 said: Nintendo has money and needs a stable Metroid developer, Microsoft is in a shopping-spree and Sony might want a new FPS exclusive. Let the race begin. |
lol
Luke888 said: Nintendo has money and needs a stable Metroid developer, Microsoft is in a shopping-spree and Sony might want a new FPS exclusive. Let the race begin. |
Not entirely sure that Bungie is quite right for Metroid, but I do like the idea of Bungie I.P being exclusive to Nintendo consoles. It would be a good timeline.
The Democratic Nintendo fan....is that a paradox? I'm fond of one of the more conservative companies in the industry, but I vote Liberally and view myself that way 90% of the time?
dx11332sega said:
Microsoft pockets are very deep and provide freedom I hope bungie makes an exclusive deal with them activision pockets are 2nd behind microsoft me thinks I don't know any other that comes close to that? |
Microsoft's pockets are deep , but the money would come from the xbox division and they have a budget, plus there was no deep pocketed sugar daddy just a commercial publishing arrangement that made both parties money.
Research shows Video games help make you smarter, so why am I an idiot
LurkerJ said: It's easy to blame Activision for the bad reception TWO, not one, Bungie games have received. It's not like their union was forced upon Bungie. |
I don't know the numbers currently for D2. But, D1 was very big, on the new IP scale. So, it is safe to say that the Destiny franchise is very significant. Certainly not make-or-break for Activision. But, it is definitely worth some real money, considering that it has a fairly sizeable, extremely dedicated fanbase.
LurkerJ said: It's easy to blame Activision for the bad reception TWO, not one, Bungie games have received. It's not like their union was forced upon Bungie. |
It's is one likely scenario behind Activision deciding to sell the IP to bungie , the other scenario being when they came up with the ten year plan there may have been a clause where it came back to Bungie at the end of the ten year contract if there wasn't a renewal of contract , this would tie in with activision selling now , not wanting to renew contract due to gaming climate and Destiny had made them good money but was now past its peak so rather than wait for the IP to revert to Bungie make an early sale.
Research shows Video games help make you smarter, so why am I an idiot
Shadow1980 said: Okay. Good. Now drop the MMO elements and make the story mode a proper single-player offline FPS experience with a definite beginning, middle, and end (co-op and RPG elements are fine, but none of that farming shit). Without Activision's grubby little paws on Bungie there's no excuse for Bungie to do any of the bullshit that's forced into AAA games these days by the likes of Acti and the other majors. |
I have some doubts that Bungie would even have sided with Activision in the first place if the MMO elements were forced on them. So, this is exactly what they wanted the game to be initially.