By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Sony Discussion - Last Of Us: Part II Releasing In 2019?

 

Will Last of Us: Part II Release In 2019?

Yes 14 48.28%
 
No 15 51.72%
 
Total:29

If there's a miracle, yes. I could see them holding off and release it at the end of PS4/Launch title for PS5, aka BOTW style



NND: 0047-7271-7918 | XBL: Nights illusion | PSN: GameNChick

Around the Network
TranceformerFX said:
pitzy272 said:

This is truly what they should do. They’ve found massive success with ps4. Massive success with ps5 is not a guarantee, however; the past two generations have shown this with the switching of the throne taker. 

MS is hungrier than I’ve ever seen them, and Phil Spencer is knocking it out of the park with his vision and delivery

This made me lawl so hard. You do realize this is the guy that cancelled Scalebound (the X1's only prominent exclusive RPG) and has delayed Crackdown 3 three times. He was also the one who canned couch co-op in Halo 5. Yes, his vision and delivery is SO GREAT....

Come on, it's not his fault! He just asked them to change their game completely to focus on multi-player even though it wasn't a good match, and canceled the game because they couldn't do it properly.

Not his fault, it's obviously because of Don Mattrick anyway.

(Just anticipating the usual answers, Don Mattrick being the biggest scapegoat in the history of video games... )



I can't help feel we would of seen a lot more of it if it were that far into its development to be releasing this year.

2020 and one of the last great games to release on ps4 before the release of ps5.



PSN ID: Stokesy 

Add me if you want but let me know youre from this website

PwerlvlAmy said:
If there's a miracle, yes. I could see them holding off and release it at the end of PS4/Launch title for PS5, aka BOTW style

I think they'll release it on PS4 first to sell the first 7+ million and then later on PS5 to sell another 10+ million, aka Mario Kart 8 style



Doesn't make sense to me. Days Gone releasing slightly before May, and then TLOU2 by the end of the same year? Both being zombie type wilderness games, I can't help but think they will have at least a full years gap between them. Feb/Mar 2020 would be the absolute earliest I'd anticipate seeing TLOU2 on PS4.



Around the Network
Replicant said:
PwerlvlAmy said:
If there's a miracle, yes. I could see them holding off and release it at the end of PS4/Launch title for PS5, aka BOTW style

I think they'll release it on PS4 first to sell the first 7+ million and then later on PS5 to sell another 10+ million, aka Mario Kart 8 style

Ya that's quite possible. But I just can't see it releasing this year. We'll see though.



NND: 0047-7271-7918 | XBL: Nights illusion | PSN: GameNChick

PwerlvlAmy said:
Replicant said:

I think they'll release it on PS4 first to sell the first 7+ million and then later on PS5 to sell another 10+ million, aka Mario Kart 8 style

Ya that's quite possible. But I just can't see it releasing this year. We'll see though.

Yeah, you're probably right.



Faelco said:

So you never heard of "Game of the year edition" , or other re-release of games on the same platform with additional content or slight improvements?

It's already a usual thing, no-one is angry about it. 

Well we are not talking about GOTY editions. We are talking about reselling games again on next gen systems.

With the way the industry is moving forward, theres no point having both. If the PS5 is BC than theres no need to remaster a 1 or 2 year old game. As with Pro and X aswell as other gaming services, performance improvements are free. 

Only way around that is by chopping BC out of the next gen systems, than it becomes accepted for a Remaster.

Imagine if Steam released game X in 2019, than in 2020 they announced a remaster of game X.. it doesnt work for consumers, they expect game X to be updated for free, not re-releasing it as a separate game.



Faelco said:
TranceformerFX said:

This made me lawl so hard. You do realize this is the guy that cancelled Scalebound (the X1's only prominent exclusive RPG) and has delayed Crackdown 3 three times. He was also the one who canned couch co-op in Halo 5. Yes, his vision and delivery is SO GREAT....

Come on, it's not his fault! He just asked them to change their game completely to focus on multi-player even though it wasn't a good match, and canceled the game because they couldn't do it properly.

Not his fault, it's obviously because of Don Mattrick anyway.

(Just anticipating the usual answers, Don Mattrick being the biggest scapegoat in the history of video games... )

I can confirm I don't have anything to do with these blunders from my sucessor.

If you want to play good Halo and exclusives I have a good console for you, X360.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."

twintail said:
Azzanation said:

If your console supports BC than you will shoot yourself in the foot with selling the remasters. Because like Steam and Xbox, gamers would expect quility of life improvements for free. Remasters only really work if the system isnt BC. Why do you think TLOU RM sold so well on PS4? (Besides the forced bundling) because there was no other way in playing it. 

In this case, Sony have major competitors offering free upgrades to games much like the X and Pro versions. If you start trying to milk games by re selling them while the games work on the platform, this will create noise from angry consumers wanting these improvements for free, much like how every one else is doing it.

So it will be a problem for Sony but it isn't/ won't be a problem for MS? The X1 already supports enhancements of XB and 360 games while also supporting the supply of remasters that get released. Some of these games, from what I understand, do overlap. So it works there, it will work on PS5.

If anything this will only enhance what remasters should offer: not just basic updates that the console itself can provide. One such example would be the inclusion of VR into games, which is something BC is never going to accomplish by itself. So the nature of remasters will change.

Let us not forget that TloU, while a critical darling on PS3 was also released just prior to the PS4 launch. At this point the PS3 was hardly even relevant as a console. The immediate success of the PS4, especially in terms of creating a desire from consumers, resulted in many non-PS3 owners buying a PS4. Shuhei himself even stated that data they collected showed new users into the PS ecosystem. You make it sound as if all PS3 owners of the game rebought it on PS4 when really the game was catering to a new and expanded audience.

Still, I am waiting to know which other remasters made Sony so much money that sticking to remasters is clearly the better thing for Sony? They barely even pump out remasters this gen, and have come to a halt on their PS2 classics remasters, and Patapon 2 is MIA right now. Clearly Sony don't care as much about the remaster game as you make them out to do so. it is not really big business and only few select titles are really seeing major gains from being remastered. 

So, if MS has no problem running a BC programme that also allows games to be enhanced, while also not denying remasters being release on their current platform, then why would this be a problem for Sony? Nothing even remotely suggests that there would be any mass worry over this. 

I already gave you several examples so you don't need to ask them from another person.

Uncharted collection, GoW3, TLOU, Heavy Rain + B2S from top of mind

if you want more

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High-definition_remasters_for_PlayStation_consoles



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."