Quantcast
NPD: Smash Ultimate sold 3M+ in 11 days in US,Pokemon Let's go 2M+

Forums - Sales Discussion - NPD: Smash Ultimate sold 3M+ in 11 days in US,Pokemon Let's go 2M+

Amazing, Nintendo is on fire, just to think this are only two weeks (smash will sell like 10 + milion units this december alone), and the best two weeks are not over yet, Switch will sell like crazy this december!! congrats Ninty!!



24 years playing games.

nintendo network ID: Teriolforce ADD ME!!

currently playing Planetside 2

i7 4770k, RAM 32 Gb 1800 mhz, AMD 7990 Ghz Edition, gigabyte z87 deluxe.

Around the Network
tbone51 said:

Beat me to it :P

3mil in in US is hugeeee. It means that the game will be the highest selling exclusive launch in history and not only that but itll be the top by a mile.

Halo 3 has 3.3mil. Smash has 3mil with like how many more days of tracking lmao? One being chirstmas week xD

Looks like my prediction looking a little realistic lmao

 

 

Edit: brawl did 2.7mil first month (6th best US launch). GoW and Spiderman did 1.9mil and 2.6mil respectively

When you say "first month", do they track the entire first month, or is it like launch week sales where it's simply the sales of the days left in the month? Because Halo 3 sold 3.3 mil in like 5-6 days if the 2nd statement is the benchmark. 



AngryLittleAlchemist said:
tbone51 said:

Beat me to it :P

3mil in in US is hugeeee. It means that the game will be the highest selling exclusive launch in history and not only that but itll be the top by a mile.

Halo 3 has 3.3mil. Smash has 3mil with like how many more days of tracking lmao? One being chirstmas week xD

Looks like my prediction looking a little realistic lmao

 

 

Edit: brawl did 2.7mil first month (6th best US launch). GoW and Spiderman did 1.9mil and 2.6mil respectively

When you say "first month", do they track the entire first month, or is it like launch week sales where it's simply the sales of the days left in the month? Because Halo 3 sold 3.3 mil in like 5-6 days if the 2nd statement is the benchmark. 

It is within the month. So if something launches earlier in the month it has an advantage over something that launches later in the month. 



 

SpokenTruth said:
Nuvendil said:

I think people often forget that generations are entirely arbitrary categorizations used in the industry to divide the history of console sales and competition into periods dominated by sets of hardware that were considered contemparies of one another and were each other's principle competition.  The Switch makes the most sense as a Gen 8 platform.  Yes, that means Nintendo had 2.  Doesn't really matter.  Barring miraculous legs or a surprise early launch for gen 9, the Switch will garner the majority of its sales in competition with the PS4 and Xbone.  And it will do so over a period of 3 years or more.  Rolling it into gen 9 would make no sense.  

Absolutely correct.  And having 2 consoles in the same generation is not unprecedented.  Magnavox had 2 consoles in the first generation, Atari had 2 in the second generation, Sega and Atari both had 2 in the 3rd generation and SNK had 2 in the fourth generation.  It's less common now but it's certainly not something unique to Nintendo this generation.

Too many people think power determines their inclusion into a generation but nobody in the industry itself has ever used that criterion.

Untrue. 

The video game crash counts as a separate generation.  That explains why it "appears" that some of those consoles were in the same generation.  Truth is that Atari 2600, 5200 and 7800 were all in a different generation.  Each one was meant to be the successor to the previous one.  But Atari 5200 was the console of the "crash generation" so it incorrectly gets lumped in with generation 2.

The second situation where it seems like their are 2 consoles in the same generation is when their are two product lines.  Like we could say Nintendo had the SNES and Gameboy in the same generation, but those are obviously two different product lines.  So you could also have Atari ST and Atari 7800 released close together, but those are also two different product lines.

The third situation is when a console is canceled prematurely after 1-2 years, like the Virtual Boy or the Sega SG-1000.  In this case you can have two consoles in the same generation, because the first one was canceled very prematurely.  On the other hand Switch was released 6 years after 3DS.  That is a normal generation.  Switch was also released about 4.5 years after the Wii U.  That also is normal for a generation.  Historically, 4-7 years is the normal time frame for a generation.  

Bottom line is that Switch is in the next generation.  The term is not an arbitrary construct.  A typical console grows, peaks, declines, and then spawns a successor while continuing to decline.  This repeated pattern is very analogous to a that of a living organism (or group of organisms) so it is called a "console generation".  It's a simple way to describe a set of complex phenomena.  People use the term generation, so they can make sense of it all.  And originally the term was used to simply tell customers, "hey guys we have another console coming out."  By any reasonable definition of a console generation, the Switch is generation 9.  



Acevil said:
AngryLittleAlchemist said:

When you say "first month", do they track the entire first month, or is it like launch week sales where it's simply the sales of the days left in the month? Because Halo 3 sold 3.3 mil in like 5-6 days if the 2nd statement is the benchmark. 

It is within the month. So if something launches earlier in the month it has an advantage over something that launches later in the month. 

Soooo basically Halo 3 sold twice as quickly as Smash did?

 

Still impressive but this handicaps the real competition for #1 spot. Now it's guaranteed. 



Around the Network

Can we have a moment to appreciate BoTW? 4 million in the US (with 1m in Japan) means that Europe has probably been toe to toe with US number. Impressive!



YNWA

Very well deserved sales!



The absence of evidence is NOT the evidence of absence...

PSN: StlUzumaki23

AngryLittleAlchemist said:
Acevil said:

It is within the month. So if something launches earlier in the month it has an advantage over something that launches later in the month. 

Soooo basically Halo 3 sold twice as quickly as Smash did?

 

Still impressive but this handicaps the real competition for #1 spot. Now it's guaranteed. 

I believe the NPD tracking period for the Halo 3 record setting month was a few days in to October and it had 10-11 days of tracking to get there.



AngryLittleAlchemist said:
Acevil said:

It is within the month. So if something launches earlier in the month it has an advantage over something that launches later in the month. 

Soooo basically Halo 3 sold twice as quickly as Smash did?

 

Still impressive but this handicaps the real competition for #1 spot. Now it's guaranteed. 

No, the NPD reporting period for September 2007 was Sept 2nd to October 6th, the game released on September 25th so it had 11 days of tracking.  Smash has the benefit of launching earlier in the month and in December, nothing to take away from its sales (Smash will have 29 days of tracking for December's NPD).

Last edited by Train wreck - on 18 December 2018

AngryLittleAlchemist said:
Acevil said:

It is within the month. So if something launches earlier in the month it has an advantage over something that launches later in the month. 

Soooo basically Halo 3 sold twice as quickly as Smash did?

 

Still impressive but this handicaps the real competition for #1 spot. Now it's guaranteed. 

Halo 3 did 3.3m in 12 days, Smash 3m in 11 days, pretty even.



When the herd loses its way, the shepard must kill the bull that leads them astray.