Shocking port. They shouldn't even have bothered.
Would you be proud to launch a game like this? | |||
yes | 11 | 20.37% | |
no | 43 | 79.63% | |
Total: | 54 |
Shocking port. They shouldn't even have bothered.
I love it the realistic graphic turn into cartoon canvas like Zelda Breath of The Wild. Probably going to buy it. Nintendo games always have such awesome art.
Lol, I knew this would be bad when they announced it, just by looking at the ps4 and xbox version of the game. Didn't think it would be this bad though
- Our album on spotify https://open.spotify.com/album/56mEbEgyBYGzcDyZ1eMQ1v?si=hYKgir5YRSCrzywgGmV4oQ
- Our videoclip
- My manga: https://www.webtoons.com/en/challenge/blanca-the-world/list?title_no=313068
Not a great port. Ark is a troubled game in general however quite popular.
All those complaining about it.. you would have never survived 90s gaming. Try playing a FPS at 15 frames at low res.
What a shameful display, kudos to the developers for making an unoptimized game look worse than ever before.
Azzanation said:
All those complaining about it.. you would have never survived 90s gaming. Try playing a FPS at 15 frames at low res. |
Actually, I did survive 90s gaming. I played Doom on SNES at 224p/10fps. But technical standards have advanced by lightyears since then, there is absolutely no excuse for a game to look this horrible in 2018.
Azzanation said: Not a great port. Ark is a troubled game in general however quite popular. |
I got into gaming with 90s gaming. The Nintendo 64 was the first system I ever played. And Goldeneye was one of the games I used to play the most and that game regularly ran at 15 frames. Advances in technology leads to new standards and expectations, if another Bond game were released today and it ran at 15 frames, it would universally panned and trashed as an utter abomination.
Current Thread
Is Hardware Getting TOO Powerful?
Older Threads:
PlayStation/Xbox/Switch: 2022 Edition
PlayStation/Xbox/Switch Hardware Battle: 2021 Edition!
PlayStation 4/Xbox One/Nintendo Switch: 2019 vs. 2020
PlayStation 4/Xbox One/Nintendo Switch: 2018 vs. 2019
PlayStation 4/Xbox One/Nintendo Switch: 2017 vs. 2018
PlayStation 4: 2015 vs. 2016 vs. 2017
curl-6 said: Actually, I did survive 90s gaming. I played Doom on SNES at 224p/10fps. But technical standards have advanced by lightyears since then, there is absolutely no excuse for a game to look this horrible in 2018. |
Standards rise and so do games pushing more.
PAOerfulone said: I got into gaming with 90s gaming. The Nintendo 64 was the first system I ever played. And Goldeneye was one of the games I used to play the most and that game regularly ran at 15 frames. Advances in technology leads to new standards and expectations, if another Bond game were released today and it ran at 15 frames, it would universally panned and trashed as an utter abomination. |
As i mentioned above, games are pushing alot more than what goldeneye was achieving and the hardware these days become alot more complicated etc.
I am not making excuses for the poor port, however if you can play a game at 15 frames in the 90s than you can play a game at 15 frames in 2018.
Its just funny seeing the complaints considering how spoilt mordern gamers actually are.
Azzanation said:
Standards rise and so do games pushing more.
As i mentioned above, games are pushing alot more than what goldeneye was achieving and the hardware these days become alot more complicated etc. I am not making excuses for the poor port, however if you can play a game at 15 frames in the 90s than you can play a game at 15 frames in 2018. Its just funny seeing the complaints considering how spoilt mordern gamers actually are. |
There's nothing "spoilt" about objecting to a product of such staggering low quality being sold for $50 in this day and age.
Last edited by curl-6 - on 14 December 2018Bring on the RDR2 port next!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F1gWECYYOSo
Please Watch/Share this video so it gets shown in Hollywood.