By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - NSFW Discussion - Some guys remain single by choice because it is easier!

 

Men choose to remain single and give up on women?

They do not want to becom... 9 7.69%
 
They do not want to change! 12 10.26%
 
They do not need a woman'... 3 2.56%
 
They do not want to conform to society! 5 4.27%
 
They have busy life and d... 9 7.69%
 
They are a man-child and never grew up! 17 14.53%
 
They are regarded as a lo... 15 12.82%
 
Modern feminism double st... 19 16.24%
 
Other! 27 23.08%
 
They choose sex workers instead! 1 0.85%
 
Total:117

Gehehehe



 "I think people should define the word crap" - Kirby007

Join the Prediction League http://www.vgchartz.com/predictions

Instead of seeking to convince others, we can be open to changing our own minds, and seek out information that contradicts our own steadfast point of view. Maybe it’ll turn out that those who disagree with you actually have a solid grasp of the facts. There’s a slight possibility that, after all, you’re the one who’s wrong.

Around the Network

So he got banned.....

What happened?
I thought he was acting like a bot, but maybe it was just laziness that he copied text from other websites.



I LOVE ICELAND!

Damn he is banned.
Use the time you are banned to think about why those generalisations about women are not the right way to think about things darklord.
If you do not like to have contact with them in real life then start in chatrooms and you will learn that so many different types of people exist,take care.



the-pi-guy said:

I'm hoping when you get back, you will see some of the things I have here.

Dark_Lord_2008 said:
The Six Sixes:
Six-pack abs.
Six feet tall.
Six inches below the belt.
Six-figure salary.
Six hundred horsepower car.
Six months out of a relationship.

Darn I do not have any of the six sixes that women want!

So how does this even make sense?  

Do you think there are all these rich, or fit men who are in relationships with every single women?  
My personal experience has been the opposite.  The poorest of my friends are in serious relationships, and the richest have never been with anyone.

Dark_Lord_2008 said:

There is a point you realise you have absolutely no hope and just give up and accept the reality of your situation. More single guys and less available single women in most cities/towns and it is a simple mathematical equation where some guys just remain undateable regardless of what job they do or their personality. So many people do not apply logic and reasoning when it comes to dating and waste too much believing they have a chance when they are just wasting their time. Why settle for less when you are better off being alone?

Again, how is it that there are more single guys and fewer single women, when there are more women in the world than there are men?  

 

Here's the reality of why some men choose to give up:

1.) Some of them have an unhealthy idea of what dating is.  You can't just walk up to a woman and expect her to say yes.  She might be in a relationship with someone, she might have her own crush on someone. 

2.) The most common way to get into a relationship is with someone you are already friends with.  So if someone isn't making an effort to be someone's friend, they are already less likely to get into a relationship.  (Again, even being someone's friend isn't a guarantee, see 1)

3.)  There are plenty of men who completely miss the signs that someone likes them.  Some men give up and think that no one ever gave them a chance.  

4.) Dating is and always has been a gamble.  You never know if someone will like you back.  Just because you lose out on a gamble, or even 10, doesn't mean that there's some societal problem with women.  The reason why some men give up, is because they don't recognize that.  

5.)  They see hollywood and think that's what real life is like for some people.  

Case in point:

Dark_Lord_2008 said: 

If a woman is interested in a guy she will admit she is interested in him. Dating/relationships are black and white and there is either instant attraction/love at first sight or there is no attraction/not interested. Where there is no attraction/no interest, move onto next! There is no subtleness it is obvious interest or there is no interest. I am an Aspie and I see the world in black and white I know that my theory is true because most non-Aspies I know have felt instant connection, love at first sight. I have never felt instant connection and never experienced love at first sight because I am an Aspie!

This doesn't happen.  

There are plenty of women who are scared to say how they feel.  No one has a "love at first sight" feeling.  That is only Hollywood.  

ofcourse people can have such a feeling but its rare and mostly not wise.



the-pi-guy said:

I'm hoping when you get back, you will see some of the things I have here.

Dark_Lord_2008 said:
The Six Sixes:
Six-pack abs.
Six feet tall.
Six inches below the belt.
Six-figure salary.
Six hundred horsepower car.
Six months out of a relationship.

Darn I do not have any of the six sixes that women want!

So how does this even make sense?  

Do you think there are all these rich, or fit men who are in relationships with every single women?  
My personal experience has been the opposite.  The poorest of my friends are in serious relationships, and the richest have never been with anyone.

Dark_Lord_2008 said:

There is a point you realise you have absolutely no hope and just give up and accept the reality of your situation. More single guys and less available single women in most cities/towns and it is a simple mathematical equation where some guys just remain undateable regardless of what job they do or their personality. So many people do not apply logic and reasoning when it comes to dating and waste too much believing they have a chance when they are just wasting their time. Why settle for less when you are better off being alone?

Again, how is it that there are more single guys and fewer single women, when there are more women in the world than there are men?  

 

Here's the reality of why some men choose to give up:

1.) Some of them have an unhealthy idea of what dating is.  You can't just walk up to a woman and expect her to say yes.  She might be in a relationship with someone, she might have her own crush on someone. 

2.) The most common way to get into a relationship is with someone you are already friends with.  So if someone isn't making an effort to be someone's friend, they are already less likely to get into a relationship.  (Again, even being someone's friend isn't a guarantee, see 1)

3.)  There are plenty of men who completely miss the signs that someone likes them.  Some men give up and think that no one ever gave them a chance.  

4.) Dating is and always has been a gamble.  You never know if someone will like you back.  Just because you lose out on a gamble, or even 10, doesn't mean that there's some societal problem with women.  The reason why some men give up, is because they don't recognize that.  

5.)  They see hollywood and think that's what real life is like for some people.  

Case in point:

Dark_Lord_2008 said: 

If a woman is interested in a guy she will admit she is interested in him. Dating/relationships are black and white and there is either instant attraction/love at first sight or there is no attraction/not interested. Where there is no attraction/no interest, move onto next! There is no subtleness it is obvious interest or there is no interest. I am an Aspie and I see the world in black and white I know that my theory is true because most non-Aspies I know have felt instant connection, love at first sight. I have never felt instant connection and never experienced love at first sight because I am an Aspie!

This doesn't happen.  

There are plenty of women who are scared to say how they feel.  No one has a "love at first sight" feeling.  That is only Hollywood.  

I fear this will be lost on him.

Reading his logic from 2010 from the other places he showed us, nothing has changed.

I mean he complains about UNI and how HECS is a bad idea and that RICH KIDS have the advantage.

HECS = Gov pays for your UNI upfront then you pay it off once you get a job, X% based on income size.

He always looks at who is better than him and not who is worst off. A lot of people start with nothing and make something of themselves. I was one of those poor fucks who took the HECS option. It took me 7 years to pay off. Instead of looking at the negative, oh fuck I will owe money, I looked at the positive. My degree allowed me to get a better job. Now I earn more thank would have otherwise earned if I went down a negative path of FUCK UNI I DON'T WANT TO PAY HECS.

The problem with Australians, especially 3rd or 4th generation, is they never known real hardship. They expect everything for nothing, instead of going out there to get something.

In reality we are here to to reproduce by nature. The way he should look at life is, the hardship I suffer I do not want for my children. Therefore I will work my add off to make sure their life is that little bit easier.

Yes people are born into wealth, but at the same time, someone generations ago in that family had to create that wealth. Everyone is cable of leaving that legacy behind for their family if they try. Those that created the wealth have scarified a lot in life. It is true money does not buy happiness. I am better off than my parents ever where, but at the same time compared to other people I have scarified a lot of holidays and life experiences to get to were I am. I want my kids to be able to enjoy life the way I couldn't at a young age. I do not want them to end up like Dark blaming society for no fucking valid reason and living on handouts lol.

Last edited by Cobretti2 - on 17 January 2019

 

 

Around the Network
Cobretti2 said:

The problem with Australians, especially 3rd or 4th generation, is they never known real hardship. They expect everything for nothing, instead of going out there to get something.

That's a bit of a generalization. I know a lot of Aussies who have led very difficult lives. Problems such as poverty, substance abuse, domestic abuse, sexual assault, disability, and other hardships haven't gone away. 

That said, a lot of these people have gone on to make something of themselves and lead a fulfilling life in spite of their hardships. They didn't do it by expecting something for nothing though, they worked their arses off.



curl-6 said:
Cobretti2 said:

The problem with Australians, especially 3rd or 4th generation, is they never known real hardship. They expect everything for nothing, instead of going out there to get something.

That's a bit of a generalization. I know a lot of Aussies who have led very difficult lives. Problems such as poverty, substance abuse, domestic abuse, sexual assault, disability, and other hardships haven't gone away. 

That said, a lot of these people have gone on to make something of themselves and lead a fulfilling life in spite of their hardships. They didn't do it by expecting something for nothing though, they worked their arses off.

I was more referring to like wars, communism, no dole payments to give you financial assistance. Some of that is still fresh and on going in other countries.

I don't disagree that the things you said exist, but when you lived in one of those other countries you learn to appreciate what Australia has to offer.

The people in my generalised description are the people on the dole who been there because their parents are there and grandparents before.  The ones that try to get out are called the "black sheep" of the family. FML, they trying to get out of this lazy shithole life and all you do is bring them down. The only reason we don't steralise people with that mentality is because our government wants them to reproduce. They are swing voters that are easy to please with simple things like, oh we will give you a $900 pay out rather than take responsibility and actual build something meaningful to benefit al of Australia instead of always argue because its the other party's idea.



 

 

Cobretti2 said:
curl-6 said:

That's a bit of a generalization. I know a lot of Aussies who have led very difficult lives. Problems such as poverty, substance abuse, domestic abuse, sexual assault, disability, and other hardships haven't gone away. 

That said, a lot of these people have gone on to make something of themselves and lead a fulfilling life in spite of their hardships. They didn't do it by expecting something for nothing though, they worked their arses off.

I was more referring to like wars, communism, no dole payments to give you financial assistance. Some of that is still fresh and on going in other countries.

I don't disagree that the things you said exist, but when you lived in one of those other countries you learn to appreciate what Australia has to offer.

The people in my generalised description are the people on the dole who been there because their parents are there and grandparents before.  The ones that try to get out are called the "black sheep" of the family. FML, they trying to get out of this lazy shithole life and all you do is bring them down. The only reason we don't steralise people with that mentality is because our government wants them to reproduce. They are swing voters that are easy to please with simple things like, oh we will give you a $900 pay out rather than take responsibility and actual build something meaningful to benefit al of Australia instead of always argue because its the other party's idea.

Oh yeah we absolutely have it great here compared to a lot of countries in terms of our standard of living, and I do consider myself very, very lucky to live here.

It's just that even in a first world country some people slip through the cracks.



curl-6 said:
Cobretti2 said:

I was more referring to like wars, communism, no dole payments to give you financial assistance. Some of that is still fresh and on going in other countries.

I don't disagree that the things you said exist, but when you lived in one of those other countries you learn to appreciate what Australia has to offer.

The people in my generalised description are the people on the dole who been there because their parents are there and grandparents before.  The ones that try to get out are called the "black sheep" of the family. FML, they trying to get out of this lazy shithole life and all you do is bring them down. The only reason we don't steralise people with that mentality is because our government wants them to reproduce. They are swing voters that are easy to please with simple things like, oh we will give you a $900 pay out rather than take responsibility and actual build something meaningful to benefit al of Australia instead of always argue because its the other party's idea.

Oh yeah we absolutely have it great here compared to a lot of countries in terms of our standard of living, and I do consider myself very, very lucky to live here.

It's just that even in a first world country some people slip through the cracks.

I know my view on it is most likely skewed but everything i see about Australians is more laid back,welcoming,friendly compared to other countries. 



Immersiveunreality said:
curl-6 said:

Oh yeah we absolutely have it great here compared to a lot of countries in terms of our standard of living, and I do consider myself very, very lucky to live here.

It's just that even in a first world country some people slip through the cracks.

I know my view on it is most likely skewed but everything i see about Australians is more laid back,welcoming,friendly compared to other countries. 

For most part that is a good assessment.  Some people are too laid back as they don't want to work lol