| Barkley said: There's been PLENTY of new series this generation. Destiny If we're counting reboots or big changes to a series like you do in your second list: Wolfenstein |
Alot of the games you mentioned weren't as big as some of the IP's i mentioned
if i included alot of low quality new IP's like your list released last gen then the list will become too long
| lightningfunk said: Alot of the games you mentioned weren't as big as some of the IP's i mentioned if i included alot of low quality new IP's like your list released last gen then the list will become too long |
You already included Haze, I stuck to that bar, the only games I listed that likely sold less are Recore and Super Lucky's Tale. Regardless this generation also has a couple of years left in it.
Barkley said:
You already included Haze, I stuck to that bar, the only games I listed that likely sold less are Recore and Super Lucky's Tale. Regardless this generation also has a couple of years left in it. |
that was a mistake
Ka-pi96 said:
Every single one of those is on console. Besides, you actually listed a PC exclusive in the OP (The Witcher), so you can't start pretending PC games don't count now. Edit: Actually speaking of The Witcher, it's not a new franchise since the books existed long before the 7th gen and it wasn't big at all either. The franchise wasn't even remotely big until #3 in gen 8. |
PC's doesn't really have a gen,consoles do.
PC platform is a never ending generation as it doesn't have iterations except a new graphic card
Barkley said:
"Some of those aren't new ip." *looks at OP*
"Half that list were considered to be huge dissapointments" HAZE But you really think many of these games are "massive disappointments"? Of the 60 listed I think maybe 5 could match that criteria imo. Evolve And while No Man Sky was disappointing at launch, it isn't anymore. |
I'm just talking a out your list. His one has weird mistakes and is a LOT less comprehensive than yours.
Mario and rabbids, 2 dragon quests, final fantasy, dirt, middle earth, mad max. Which brings your list of new ips to 35.
Massive disappointments might have been an exaggeration, but a large portion of your list was considered disappointing to a degree.
Destiny
The crew
Order 1886
Ryse
Record
Knack
Sea of thieves
Driveclub
Detroit
Super luckys tale
Quantum break
No man's sky
Watch dogs
Steep
Dying light
The evil within
For honour
Evolve
Division
Ark
Arms
All of these have a meta of 80 or less. Which generally considered a little disappointing at least. A lot scored in the low 70s or worse.
I cut out 28, which brings your list of currently released new ips, to around 14.
alternine said:
Doesn't matter if you think they're disappointments. He just punched a giant hole in your argument here. A fairly big list of all the new franchises. You guys just love being negative lol |
Shouldn't a game have a sequel out before it's first release gets called "a new franchise/series" though? Not a planned sequel, because anyone can launch a game and say there are going to be follow ups. But if the follow up never happens, like in the case of "Ryse", can you really say that "Ryse" is a franchise or series? I don't think so.
Mandalore76 said:
Shouldn't a game have a sequel out before it's first release gets called "a new franchise/series" though? Not a planned sequel, because anyone can launch a game and say there are going to be follow ups. But if the follow up never happens, like in the case of "Ryse", can you really say that "Ryse" is a franchise or series? I don't think so. |
I agree they're not really franchises or series with only one entry. Though I was just following the criteria set in the OP, (PSABR, Heavy Rain, Demon Souls etc).
Though if we do only include games with multiple entries that give a big advantage to the older generation anyway. With series like TLOU, Rage not getting their second game until the following generation.
pikashoe said:
Some of those aren't new ip. Half that list were considered to be huge disappointments. |
lightningfunk said:
Some of the games you list are partly PC and online games. If I we including PC and online games and handheld and Mobile games released last gen then the list will be too long |
Stop moving the posts. You said that there haven't been a lot of new Is released this gen and have been shown otherwise. If you want to start talking about the quality of said releases thats a different matter.
And those lists aren,t even covering all of them.
Mandalore76 said:
Shouldn't a game have a sequel out before it's first release gets called "a new franchise/series" though? Not a planned sequel, because anyone can launch a game and say there are going to be follow ups. But if the follow up never happens, like in the case of "Ryse", can you really say that "Ryse" is a franchise or series? I don't think so. |
If we do that his list will be reduced too. Like by as much s 13 titles or so. And he made alot of mistakes. Like Red dead is actually a Gen 6 game not a gen 7. Its actually called Red dead revolver.
And one can argue that this gen is very different wth its approach to franchising. Just look at rainbow six siege for instance. We have more continuing series this gen with a lot of DLC support expanding the game.
OP included Duke Nukem.
This is clearly a joke thread.
Please stop taking it seriously.
About Us |
Terms of Use |
Privacy Policy |
Advertise |
Staff |
Contact
Display As Desktop
Display As Mobile
© 2006-2024 VGChartz Ltd. All rights reserved.
