By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - General Discussion - Since i'm more active again im also getting into trouble

SuaveSocialist said:
“Warning—Other: a lot of reasons” is my personal favourite. What did you DO and how did it avoid the Hammer?

Oh that one was glorious it was a trap within a trap

I think ill have the original picture still somewhere ill look for it tomorrow



 "I think people should define the word crap" - Kirby007

Join the Prediction League http://www.vgchartz.com/predictions

Instead of seeking to convince others, we can be open to changing our own minds, and seek out information that contradicts our own steadfast point of view. Maybe it’ll turn out that those who disagree with you actually have a solid grasp of the facts. There’s a slight possibility that, after all, you’re the one who’s wrong.

Around the Network
RolStoppable said:
pokoko said:
If you're one of those people who constantly necrobump old threads when it favors their position then I think the bans should be longer.

Is there actually a single person on this website that fits that description? Constantly necrobumping?

When someone gets banned for spamming: necrobumping, I think the question becomes quite valid.



What is your skull avatar ? Is that the new trend ?

Last edited by Oneeee-Chan!!! - on 05 December 2018

Congrats, buddy 



If you require alcohol to have fun, then you have a problem

I'm no golden boy either but man, that's a long list. The mods can be pretty unreasonable here though so good job man. One of them literally banned you for calling him a pansy and the reason is and I quote "Don't call me pansy, Pansy" Now that's abuse of power mr.ben



Just a guy who doesn't want to be bored. Also

Around the Network

Only 31 bans in 10 years?



If you demand respect or gratitude for your volunteer work, you're doing volunteering wrong.

Hm I've gotten 10 moderations in almost 2 years, although in my defense 4 of them are warnings and 1 of them should probably be removed.



AngryLittleAlchemist said:
Hm I've gotten 10 moderations in almost 2 years, although in my defense 4 of them are warnings and 1 of them should probably be removed.

Wow you're a bad boy. I've only had 5 moderations, 4 were bans though. I don't deserve warnings.

Haven't been moderated for 2 years.

 

NYEEEEEH



vivster said:
Only 31 bans in 10 years?

What your brain failed to understand is what i mentioned in the single sentence before the list is that i was permabanned before this implementation and due to a site glitch in 2008 every banned member was unbanned and given amnesty.

Edit : so there is more but it is lost to the ages



 "I think people should define the word crap" - Kirby007

Join the Prediction League http://www.vgchartz.com/predictions

Instead of seeking to convince others, we can be open to changing our own minds, and seek out information that contradicts our own steadfast point of view. Maybe it’ll turn out that those who disagree with you actually have a solid grasp of the facts. There’s a slight possibility that, after all, you’re the one who’s wrong.

StriderKiwi said:
I have to ask, with a list that lengthy of petty internet drama crimes, what are you getting out of this?

As I read through the first few, some of it and the mod comments on why you were warned/banned made me grin, but then the list kept going and I thought to myself "doesn't this guy have video games to play?"

Not trying to be a jerk, just genuinely curious.

Simple i played world of warcraft so when on a flightpath or during downtime or Auction house sniping i was browsing here and simply put it doesnt take a genius to multitask stuff. 



 "I think people should define the word crap" - Kirby007

Join the Prediction League http://www.vgchartz.com/predictions

Instead of seeking to convince others, we can be open to changing our own minds, and seek out information that contradicts our own steadfast point of view. Maybe it’ll turn out that those who disagree with you actually have a solid grasp of the facts. There’s a slight possibility that, after all, you’re the one who’s wrong.